This assignment is comprised of 2 parts, the first of which is due this week. Part II will be due in Week 7. In Part I this week, choose a case from your state that involves civil rights or civil liberties that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. If your state does not have a case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court, choose a civil rights case from another state for which the United States Supreme Court issued a decision. Here is a brief description of civil rights and civil liberties: Civil rights refers to equal social opportunities under the law. It gives you these freedoms such as the right to vote, the right to public education, or a fair trial, among other things, regardless of your wealth or race. Civil liberties mean freedom of religion, equal treatment and due process under the law, and the right to privacy. You should be able to go online and look up your state and famous cases decided by the Supreme Court. For example, Brown v Board of Education (1951) started in Topeka, Kansas and ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States. Another example would be Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v Steve Sisolak, Governor of Nevada (2020) that started in Nevada and ended up the United States Supreme Court. A good source of information about cases decided by the United States Supreme Court is www.scotusblog.com. Other sources can be researched online using search terms for “civil rights cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.” Be sure to use a case actually decided by the United States Supreme Court, and not a case decided by your state’s supreme court or a different court. A case that is still pending before the United States Supreme Court should not be used. If you are unsure, please contact your Professor BEFORE you pick your case and submit the assignment as this is a significant part of your overall grade. Research your court case and write an outline of the case that you will be using to prepare a presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. If you are unsure, then verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment. This week's assignment should include (a) summary of the case; (b) a case outline; and a summary. A. Summary of the Case In one or two paragraphs, provide a general overview of the case that serves as a snapshot of what the case is about and how it ended up in your state high court. A summary is using your words to write a brief history of the case. Do not give your opinion or your interpretation but stick to the facts only. B: Case Outline Your court case outline should include: Title: Name of the case Facts of the case: Provide key facts involving the case. History of the case: What legal action was taken based on what your state laws say about this case? Legal questions: What were the legal issues the court had to decide? Decision or holdings: Did the court decide for the plaintiff or the defendant? Explain the reason behind the decision? Verdict and opinion (judgement): What were the concurring and dissenting opinions? How many judges decided for the defendant and how many justices decided against the defendant? What was the final verdict from the judge or the jury, if it was a jury trial? C. Conclusion What was the resulting impact of the ruling? How did the citizens of your state benefit from it? Was this a good decision?

Choose and read any one case study from Chapter 13 (Personality Disorders) in DSM-5 in Action.Research the specific personality disorder from your chosen case study.Create a 10-15-slide PowerPoint presentation about your selected case study. Add some pictures. Make it interesting looking. Include the following in your presentation:A brief description of the selected case studyExplanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.Information on the course of treatment for the disorder.Identification of which cluster (A, B, or C) this personality disorder belongs to and an explanation of your rationale.Information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.A minimum of five scholarly references including your textbook and the latest version of the DSM. Be sure to only use current and scholarly references for this assignment.Detailed speaker notes that represent what you would say if giving the presentation in person.While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.RUBRICnsatisfactory0.00%2Less than Satisfactory74.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good87.00%5Excellent100.00%100.0 %Content 10.0 %Includes a brief description of the selected case studyThe presentation omits a brief description of the selected case study.The presentation includes a vague description of the selected case study.The presentation includes an adequate description of the selected case study.The presentation includes an advanced description of the selected case study.The presentation includes a comprehensive description of the selected case study.20.0 %Includes an explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a referenceThe presentation omits an explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.The presentation includes a vague explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.The presentation includes an adequate explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.The presentation includes an advanced explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.The presentation includes a comprehensive explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.15.0 %Includes information on the course of treatment for the disorderThe presentation omits information on the course of treatment for the disorder.The presentation includes vague information on the course of treatment for the disorder.The presentation includes adequate information on the course of treatment for the disorder.The presentation includes advanced information on the course of treatment for the disorder.The presentation includes comprehensive information on the course of treatment for the disorder.10.0 %Identifies which cluster (A, B, or C) this personality disorder belongs to and explain your rationaleThe presentation does not identify which cluster the personality disorder belongs or include rationale for the identification.The presentation vaguely identifies which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes some type of rationale.The presentation includes an adequate identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes and adequate rationale for the identification.The presentation includes an advanced identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and an advanced rationale for the identification.The presentation includes a comprehensive identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and a comprehensive explanation of the rationale for the identification.15.0 %Includes information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorderThe presentation omits information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.The presentation includes vague information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.The presentation includes adequate information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.The presentation includes advanced information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.The presentation includes comprehensive information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.5.0 %Detailed Speaker NotesThe presentation does not contain speaker notes.The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes.The presentation's speaker notes are present and are generally competent.The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in person.The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that give a complete picture of what would be said if the presentation were given in person.5.0 %Presentation of ContentThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.5.0 %LayoutThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

Create a PowerPoint presentation of five (5) types of experts in the field of psychology that could testify in court proceedings. For each expert, you will create (1) a title slide, (2) a slide detailing the educational requirements of the profession, (3) a slide explaining the types of cases that would require that type of expert, and (4) a slide showing a real-life example of that type of expert 'in trial (for a total of 20 slides). You will also create a slide introducing the presentation as well as a final slide listing your sources in APA format.