Attached.

Surname 1
Name
Institution
Tutor
Date
Annotated Bibliographies
Noonan Jr, John T. "Judicial Impartiality and the Judiciary Act of 1789." Nova L. Rev. 14
(1989): 123.
This paper critiques the factors that affected the Judiciary Act of 1978. It is an illustration of the
bias that takes place in Judicial contexts and brings into perspective the oath conflict witnessed at
the climax of Marbury v. Madison.
It closely describes the process that build on to impartiality and dictates a level of experience in
the authors’ practice. It is conclusively, reliable for reference in terms of defining a judge’s stand
on a case and the level at which they show a personal interest towards the outcome of each case
handled. The paper brings out reliable information concerning the statutory safeguards that
govern impartiality.
This source is useful in Law as well as studying the processes followed by the Judiciary in
making decisions based on what the institution needs to acquire. The author is well versed in the
sector and gives informational analysis based on cases that have been duly witnessed and put
into personal consideration.

Surname 2
Ogletree, Charles J. All deliberate speed: Reflections on the first half century of Brown v. Board
of Education. WW Norton & Company, 2004.
The article is a comprehensive discussion on the concepts discussed by a renowned lecturer of
law. It is an analysis of the Brown v. Board of Education case and reflects on the steps taken to
build on the validity of the arguments against the decisions that were made from those that were
not made.
The source is an extension of the best law lecturer’s transcript and is therefore detailed in its
analysis. It offers conclusive and well researched information on the case whose details were not
well looked into. The brown case was worked on by lawyers from Howard Law School with a
reputation of keenness and an attention to detail. These make the main strengths of the source.
The inclusion of footnotes creates a more detailed description of the sources used making it good
for the reader’s curiosity in terms of full and impartial information. It can be used in various
fields that are relative to Law.

Zalman, Marvin. "Miranda v. Arizona." Criminal Procedure and the Supreme Court: A Guide to
the Major Decisions on Search and Seizure, Privacy, and Individual
Rights (2010): 239.
This paper is an analysis that concerns suspects and defendants and how they are processed prior
to punishment. The book provides long case discussions and updates while still focusing on full
length cases.

Surname 3
Unlike several books, the strengths on the analysis given are that the book reviews a series of
cases that are relevant to one section in the study of Law. The lack of diversity and the in depth
understanding of the case processes shows that the authors are well versed with the statutes that
govern various law sectors.
The source is relevant in the field of law since it provides a more specified strategy towards
analyzing criminal procedures and assessing the non-quantified lists that are presented in law and
criminal procedures. The book bases its evidence on collective experiences based on each of the
authors’ levels of knowledge in all subjects’ relative to law. It makes a reliable source for all
levels relevant in the practice.

Tyler, Tom R., and Gregory Mitchell. "Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal
authority: The United States Supreme Court and abortion rights." Duke Law
Journal43.4 (1994): 703-815.
This paper critiques the validity of the endorsement of the concept of legitimacy by the court. It
creates subtopics based on generalizations looked over during processes in the court. The article
studies empowerment and compliance and does not leave out a detail on the various sectors that
analyze compliance.
The strengths and weaknesses in this article are that it creates a detailed and step by step analysis
of compliance and empowerment as important functions in the concept of legitimacy. It
however does not create a channel towards the conceptualization of other court processes.

Surname 4
It relates to psychological studies and how relevant these studies are to law. The research
methods are through quantification of various sources to reach a valid point. It analyses each
sector based on what the author views as the basis for knowledge and information.
Conclusively, the article is diverse in terms of psychological information as well as the aspect of
law within the article.

Henkin, Louis. “Executive Privilege: Mr. Nixon Loses but the Presidency Largely Prevails.”
UCLA L. Rev. 22(1974):40
The paper analyses the case of United States v. Nixon. It uses institutional law to assess the case
and diplomacy. This paper provides detailed information on the court processes during these
cases and valid opinions on the privileges granted and those that were not.
The UCLA law review focuses on the constitution in relation to the Nixon case in order to
provide solid outcomes and the reasons for the same. This source is relevant in law since it
provides an analysis of the role of the constitution within the court and outside the government
normal procedures. The research method used for the source is by theoretical and practical
explanations that focus on political issues relative to law.
The author is well versed in these sectors since he is a professor of International law and
diplomacy, It therefore is reliable that the information given is not only based on one sector of
knowledge but several integrating sectors.

Surname 5
Dyer, James R. “Texas v Johnson: Symbolic speech and flag desecration under the first
amendment.’” New Eng. L. Rev.,25 (1990): 895
The paper discusses the inclusion of various types of symbolic speech as part of the
amendment’s periodic expansion. The main subject concerns these recurring theme as...