Assignment Content #1 NSG/456 Top of Form This assignment is designed to help you understand the differences between qualitative and quantitative research designs, as well as select the appropriate method for the research question you have been working on throughout the course. Step 1: Restate your Week 1 research question and select the type of research (quantitative or qualitative) that is most appropriate for it. Step 2: Summarize the major steps in that type of research. Step 3: Determine the specific type or approach (i.e., quasi-experimental, phenomenological, etc.) you would employ and explain why that is the best selection. Step 4: Explain potential data. Step 5: Explain how analyzing and interpreting that data can inform your research question. Format your assignment as one of the following: 18- to 20-slide presentation Cite at least one peer-reviewed resource in APA format. #2. On a separate page. Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: How do you think the nurse-patient relationship and the researcher-participant relationship are alike? How are they different? (For #2 if you could please add 1 citation within the paper and cite using APA format please)

Summarize and critically appraise a selected article. In addition to a one-page executive summary, include a completed critical appraisal tool in your submission.IntroductionEvidence-based practice (EBP) is the process of searching for, appraising, and integrating the most relevant, best research evidence to answer a clinical question or address a health care challenge. This best research evidence is weighed along with patient preferences and values, organizational data, and professional expertise. Because of this, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to critically appraise research studies and the evidence they provide. Qualitative studies often provide the best evidence and are becoming more and more important in the realm of EBP. Professional literature provides tools to assist in developing this skill.Demonstration of ProficiencyBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Apply the steps of the evidence-based practice process to a health care challenge.Compose a PICOT question that the researcher might have used as a foundation for the study.Competency 2: Evaluate qualitative research methods and results as they relate to evidence-based practice.Summarize the study by describing its purpose, method, design, and results.Evaluate a qualitative study by applying a critical appraisal tool.Competency 5: Apply knowledge of your own role and those of other professions to appropriately assess and address the health care needs of patients and to promote and advance the health of populations.Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles could use the study findings to work together to provide care, promote health, and prevent disease.Competency 6: Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.PreparationSearch the Capella library for a tool that guides the critical appraisal of a qualitative study. The Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences has suggestions, or you may choose a different tool.Choose and read one of these three qualitative studies:Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.Koffer Miller, K., Mathew, M., Nonnemacher, S., & Shea, L. (2018). Program experiences of adults with autism, their families, and providers: Findings from a focus group study. Autism, 22(3), 345–356.Masupe, T. K., Ndayi, K., Tsolekile, L., Delobelle, P., & Puoane, T. (2018). Redefining diabetes and the concept of self-management from a patient’s perspective: Implications for disease risk factor management. Health Education Research, 33(1), 40–54.InstructionsWrite an executive summary, including the following:Identify PICOT components and compose a PICOT question that the researcher might have used as a foundation for the health care challenge addressed by the study.Summarize the study by describing its purpose, design, methods, and results.Following your executive summary, create a table or other organized format to record your answers to the critical appraisal tool you selected. Include at least two resources from additional research to support your answers to the appraisal. Provide citations and references for all resources used. This portion of the assessment will be graded on the following criterion:Evaluate a qualitative study by applying a critical appraisal tool.After completing the appraisal, return to the executive summary. Add explanation to meet the following criterion:Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles could use the study findings to work together to improve care, promote health, and prevent disease.Additional RequirementsPage length: Include 3–4 pages, including the executive summary and the appraisal table.References: Provide APA citations and references for the article and the critical appraisal tool you select, as well as other resources used.Writing: Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.