​Architectural Criticism

User Generated

OO123456

Writing

Description

Architectural Criticism

The project asks to look into how architecture professional community addresses a particular “communication issue” when it arises. Architectural criticism is a communication issue between architects and other architects, architects with the professions (architecture critics), and architects with a public (normal people). Obviously, this is a communication issue.

  • Intro:

Describe what architectural criticism.Why does this issue exist? Do we need architectural criticism?

Why Architectural Criticism Matters? What makes "good" architecture criticism?

  • Thesis and Bodies:

The thesis should have the three points:

1- Some people say only architects have the right to criticize other architects work

Because they know about it. (How the architects communicate with public and people ?). Do the architects explain and talk about their work? How and where architects talk about their work?

What can happen if the architects do NOT explain their work and designs to the public? Does this give people or professions (architecture critics) a chance to do that?

----------------------------

2- Some people also say only professions (architecture critics) have the right to criticize the architects work because of the absent of architects. And this point brings a question: why do we have people who work a full time jobs as architecture critics? Why do we need their architectural criticism? Is that due to the absence of architects who explain their work and designs or using their own language (vocabulary) which, give others a chance to do that

----------------------------

3- Others say normal people have the right to criticize architects work because people walk among buildings and live inside them on it. However, they do not know what theyare talking about.

Is this because some architects do not explain their work, which gives other people to talk about it?

----------------------------

  • Conclusion:

What would need to change in order for this communication issue to be solved? Whose responsibility is it to solve the issue?

Important to note:

1- At least, use 3 sources and lest them in references.

2- Use MLA format.

3- Keep it simple and easy to understand.

Thank you!

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hey buddy? Find the attached file. It was a pleasure serving you. Thanks and goodbye
Attached.

Surname 1
Course
Date
Architecture Criticism
Architecture criticism is the critique of the existing architectural designs of buildings and
structures. Criticism gets derived from the architecture's ability to complete his and other
people's objectives. Architecture criticism exists to critique the ever-increasing constructions of
buildings and apartments which get broadcasted and published in the existing media outlets. The
buildings form part of art and critiques exist to evaluate the structure and relevance to the
society. The high-end residential projects form part of the lifestyle criticism by the journalists. It
is vital for the architectural criticism to exist because of the functions it serves that benefit both
the society and the architecture. Without criticism, there would be no motivation to design
magnificent building structures. Architectures would wake up and preside over the construction
of buildings without inspiring creativity. Criticism also helps in keeping the architectures in
check while criticizing their work and in the process offer the required solutions. Other ordinary
people also form part of the critique who strive to ensure that their dwelling place is safe. A good
architecture criticism entails contents which represent height and bulk, the style, sustainability,
and openness of the architecture. Additionally, a good architecture criticism will include open
process, and will not lay emphasis on design only, but what makes the buildings habitable
(Lange 2012). Architectural criticism conspicuously presents communication problems when
different parties get involved in it- the architectures criticizing their peer's work, the professions
criticize architectures' work, and normal people are criticizing architectures' work.
Architects do have the rights of exercising critiques on another people's work. The
architects are professionals in their work and do have the capabilities to determine the right from
wrong just by looking at the buildings and structures constructed. The architects can help decode

Surname 2
other peers' work because they already know the intricate details of how structures get built.
Therefore, criticizing other architects' work will provide the information that the public will find
useful concerning the building structures. They will also communicate with the public through
the written forms of communication which are the primary form of transmitting information to
the masses. Their critiques can be found in the journals and architectural magazines...


Anonymous
Nice! Really impressed with the quality.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags