For all references, use an appropriate form of documentation (MLA, APA, or another standard academic style discussed in Easy Writer.)Discussion TopicTo complete this unit's discussion, create two separate posts: one for each of the 2 prompts below.Prompt 1Effective academic writers know how to summarize. In this prompt, use Greene and Lidinsky's categories to practice summarizing one of the assigned articles from Ch. 14. Assigned articles from Ch. 14:"Who Are You and What Are You Doing Here? A Word to the Incoming Class." by Mark Edmundson"why American Schools Are Even More Unequal Than We Thought" by Susan DynarskiCreate a post that does all of the following:Describe the key claims of the text. To understand the shape and direction of the argument, study how paragraphs begin and end, and pay attention to the author’s point of view and use of transitions. Then combine what you have learned into a few sentences describing the key claims.Select a representative quotation to illustrate the author’s argument. Find one quotation that illustrates the "flavor" of the article, and that illustrates the author's most important ideas.Present the gist of the author’s argument. Describe the author’s central idea in your own language with an eye to where you expect your argument to go. (Hint: to ensure that you are using your own language, try to present the argument in a different order than the writer does. In other words, don't try to summarize paragraph by paragraph. Instead, try to explain his position as simply and clearly as you can.)Contextualize what you summarize. Cue your readers into the conversation. Who is the author? Where and when did the text appear? Why was the author writing? Who else is in the conversation?Your post for this prompt should be about 150-200 words, and should include in-text citations for any quotations or paraphrases.Prompt 2As you learned in this week's lecture, academic writing can be thought of as a conversation. (Remember Burke's metaphor of the parlor?) After reading the assigned articles from Ch. 14, how would you describe the conversation of ideas these articles are a part of? What is the subject of this "parlor"? If you were to make a contribution to this conversation, what you say?Your post for this prompt should be about 100-200 words, and should include in-text citations for any quoted or paraphrased material.

The author of our textbook, Boucher (2017) addresses the idea of leaving people with ASD essentially "untreated" and learning how to value these individuals for their differences. What are your thoughts? If treated, should the aim of treatment be to make the affected individual "more normal" - or to make them "happier?" Discuss the pros and cons of each approach to intervention and draw a conclusion.From the additional reading, answer the following:1) In your own words, compare and contrast the terms unestablished treatment and fad treatment as they relate to ASD...provide examples.2) In your own words, describe the differences between a focused intervention and comprehensive treatment models...provide examples.3) From Table 2.2 (starts on page 26), choose at least two evidence-based practices and conduct a search (either the online MState library databases or valid websites on the internet) to learn a little bit more about the EBP's you chose. You might find a case-study...an instructional video...a research article...etc. Provide a brief summary of what you find along with the corresponding link or citation of the outside sources of information.

RequirementsResearch Topic: Oral Health This assignment will offer the opportunity to explore the population health effects associated with oral health. You will identify how oral health effects various populations (you may choose a group, such as school-aged children or the menopausal woman) and address the impact of poor oral (outcome identification). Additionally you will use the identified outcomes to craft primary, secondary and tertiary objectives for primary care. Identify your target population (for instance, age or other demographic, aggregate population); this must be in your city or state.Discuss population-based health education interventions for your target population that is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality for the problem. Be sure to review the research literature and HP2020 for interventions. Identify how and what data for interventions is being tracked.In a four (4) page paper, address the following. Refer to rubric for expanded details related to grading expectations.Identify the problem in the introduction section. Provide an overview of the problem in your state/national. Review of descriptive epidemiological and demographic data on mortality/morbidity and risk. HP2020: Present the goal, overview and objectives of Healthy People 2020 for the paper topic. Population level prevention and health promotion review. Describe population and/or primary health care focused interventions. Use of scholarly literature and HP2020 is required. There should be direct correlation to evidence for all strategies.Best Practices in Preparing the Project Review directions and rubric through carefully. Follow submission requirements.Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included. Organize the paper using the rubric sections and appropriate headings to match the sections. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly. A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature references must be used. Not all references should be from scholarly web sites. You may use your textbook, but this will not count towards the three (3) scholarly literature references.Length: Papers not adhering to the page length may be returned to you for editing to meet the length guidelines. Adhere to the Chamberlain College of Nursing academic policy on integrity as it pertains to the submission of your own original work for assignments.