Genetics and Environment

User Generated

whynaqref3

Humanities

Description

Genetics and Environment

Competency Addressed in This Discussion

This discussion addresses the following competencies:

  • Competency 4: Apply scholarly research findings to topics in criminal psychology.

Introduction

The evolution of biology, especially genetics, has provided scientific evidence of the need for a paradigm shift when considering the variables that can contribute to the resiliency an individual may have when exposed to environmental factors. The gene DRD4 is associated with the personality trait of novelty seeking and this gene is considered an indicator of ADHD. We see numerous research studies that introduce the prevalence of ADHD-type symptoms being related to criminal behaviors.

Psychology research has limited information about scientifically based correlations between any specific environmental factor that results in criminal behavior. We often confuse correlation with causation. This means that because two things happen with one following the other, we may think one caused the other, which may or may not be true. Does thunder cause lightening, or does lightening cause thunder, or do they co-occur for some other reason? An example from human behavior is that research has shown that a large percentage of people who sexually abuse were victims of sexual abuse themselves; however, only a small percentage of individuals who are sexually abused as children will sexually abuse someone else. Confusing the distinction between these two different pieces of information, people often mistakenly believe that most children who are sexually abused will abuse, which is not accurate.

Instructions

In your main post:

  • Discuss if psychological character assessment should be based on the development of pathology or on the manifestation of symptoms, referencing the unit readings and other resources.
  • Discuss your opinion on using genetics in a criminal case. Support your position with reputable research.

Discussion Objectives

The competencies addressed in this discussion are supported by discussion objectives, as follows:

  • Competency 4: Apply scholarly research findings to topics in criminal psychology.
    • Support your opinion on the use of genetics in a criminal case with reputable research.
    • Discuss if psychological character assessment should be based on the development of pathology or on the manifestation of symptoms.

Response Guidelines

After completing your main post, respond to at least two other learners' posts during the discussion week. Please note that to earn full credit for your discussion, you must participate on two separate days and make a minimum of one post on each of those two days. Comment on themes raised in the posts and pose questions to move the discussion forward.

Resources

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Genetics and Environment Competency Addressed in This Discussion This discussion addresses the following competencies: • Competency 4: Apply scholarly research findings to topics in criminal psychology. Introduction The evolution of biology, especially genetics, has provided scientific evidence of the need for a paradigm shift when considering the variables that can contribute to the resiliency an individual may have when exposed to environmental factors. The gene DRD4 is associated with the personality trait of novelty seeking and this gene is considered an indicator of ADHD. We see numerous research studies that introduce the prevalence of ADHD-type symptoms being related to criminal behaviors. Psychology research has limited information about scientifically based correlations between any specific environmental factor that results in criminal behavior. We often confuse correlation with causation. This means that because two things happen with one following the other, we may think one caused the other, which may or may not be true. Does thunder cause lightening, or does lightening cause thunder, or do they co-occur for some other reason? An example from human behavior is that research has shown that a large percentage of people who sexually abuse were victims of sexual abuse themselves; however, only a small percentage of individuals who are sexually abused as children will sexually abuse someone else. Confusing the distinction between these two different pieces of information, people often mistakenly believe that most children who are sexually abused will abuse, which is not accurate. Instructions In your main post: • • Discuss if psychological character assessment should be based on the development of pathology or on the manifestation of symptoms, referencing the unit readings and other resources. Discuss your opinion on using genetics in a criminal case. Support your position with reputable research. Discussion Objectives The competencies addressed in this discussion are supported by discussion objectives, as follows: • Competency 4: Apply scholarly research findings to topics in criminal psychology. o o Support your opinion on the use of genetics in a criminal case with reputable research. Discuss if psychological character assessment should be based on the development of pathology or on the manifestation of symptoms. Response Guidelines After completing your main post, respond to at least two other learners' posts during the discussion week. Please note that to earn full credit for your discussion, you must participate on two separate days and make a minimum of one post on each of those two days. Comment on themes raised in the posts and pose questions to move the discussion forward. Resources • PSYC Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer


Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags