Discussion Assignment

User Generated

Ubzrobl4398

Humanities

Description

I have uploaded both the instructions and the rubric for writing this discussion assignment. Please be sure to precisely follow the guidelines for this assignment.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Unit 7 Discussion - All About Eastern Cultures ● ● ● ● For this unit’s discussion, find an article in a professional journal or book, or from a reliable webpage. The article has to relate to any culture within the Eastern or Middle Eastern oriented cultures and be tied to one of the following themes: gender issues, mental health, religious intolerance, disabilities, ethical codes, Sexuality (heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality) If the article is NOT online, please submit a scanned copy of the article If the article is online, provide the link in your initial posting. Along with your link, provide the following: ● A summary of the article you chose (e.g., hypothesis, results) ● A statement on why you chose that particular culture ● An explanation of how you think this information can help you in your practice of psychology. Students should also provide at least an additional reliable web link about the culture to their peers so that they can learn more about the culture chosen. Note: Some Eastern cultures include: Central Asia, Eastern Asia such as India, China, Korea; Thailand, Vietnam, Japan, etc; aboriginal Australia and parts of Russia). Some Middle Eastern cultures include Western Asia; Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, Africa. Online Discussion Rubric: 1. Initial posts are due time-stamped by 11:59pm, Central Time, Wednesday. 2. Two (2) points per day will be deducted for late initial posts, as this has an adverse impact on the quality of the discussion and on the learning community. 3. Posting replies on Thursday and Friday of the week is a good practice; any later than Saturday has an adverse impact on the quality of the learning community. Posting all or the majority of your replies on the last day of the week will result in decreased points due to the fact that you have not been effective in participating in the discussion across the week. Performance Criteria Initial Post: Demonstration of quality content and integration of course material Participation: Feedback to class colleagues throughout the week Needs Improvement Adequate Good Exemplary Points The initial discussion post exhibits a statement that is partially or fully incorrect, or doesn’t answer the main discussion question(s). The post is not backed by the assigned readings or another source, and does not stimulate further discussion as evidenced by responses from colleagues. The initial discussion post exhibits a statement which answers or partially answers the main discussion question(s). However, the answer doesn’t demonstrate two of the following: A substantive statement including citations from the assigned readings At least 1 additional scholarly source Stimulates further discussion as evidenced by responses from colleagues The initial discussion post exhibits a statement which answers the main discussion question(s). However, the answer doesn’t demonstrate one of the following: A substantive statement including citations from the assigned readings At least 1 additional scholarly source Stimulates further discussion as evidenced by responses from colleagues The initial discussion post exhibits a strong statement which answers the main discussion question(s), and demonstrates all of the following: A substantive statement including citations from the assigned readings At least 1 additional scholarly source Stimulates further discussion as evidenced by responses from colleagues 6 points maximum 0-2 points 3-4 points 5 points 6 points The student did not give feedback to a minimum of two class colleagues’ initial posts, or the feedback given constitutes simple agreement, or was posted late Saturday and/or Sunday – too late in the week to have an impact. The student’s feedback to two or three c l a s s c o l l e a g u e s ’ initial posts do not address the posts adequately, rely mostly on sharing personal opinion, are not supported by readings or other facts, or do not challenge/invite other The student provides feedback to three class colleagues’ initial posts. The feedback posts exhibit solid answers that include citations from the assigned readings and/or other scholarly source(s), and challenge/invite other The student provides detailed feedback to three or more class colleagues’ initial posts. The feedback addresses the class colleagues’ initial posts, include citations from the assigned readings and/or other scholarly source(s), and challenges/invites other participants to further explore the topic. Approved by Department Chairs: Jan. 2017 6 points maximum participants to further explore the topic. participants to further explore the topic. 3-4 points 5 points Student responses show attention to feedback received but are not substantive. In addition, most replies were posted late in the week (Saturday night or Sunday). Student responds to all feedback received on student’s initial post, and responds to instructor’s feedback to initial post. 0-2 points 3-4 points 5 points 6 points Poor or no attention to structure and form of APA style for in-text citations and references in the initial post. Basic structure of APA followed with multiple errors and/or missing in-text citations and references. Basic structure of APA followed with no more than one error in in-text citations and references. Repetitive errors in grammar, and/or the writing style was disorganized or casual. 3 or more errors in grammar, and/or the writing style is casual or lacks a professional approach. 2 or more errors in grammar; writing style is generally adequate. Basic structure of APA followed with no more than 1 error in in-text citations and references. No errors in grammar, and the writing style is highly professional, respectful and reflective of departmental standards in writing style. 0 points 0.5 point 1 points 0-2 points Participation: In one’s own initial post in the discussion thread Academic Writing: Adherence to APA style, spelling and grammar, and consistent with standards of discipline Student does not adequately provide evidence of participating in their initial post discussion thread throughout the week. TOTAL Approved by Department Chairs: Jan. 2017 6 points Responses are proficient but not as robust or substantive. Student participates in their initial post discussion thread at least (3) separate days of the week. 6 points maximum Student writes substantial responses to all feedback received on student’s initial post, and responds to instructor’s feedback to initial post. 2 points maximum 2 points 20 points maximum
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Outline: All about Eastern Cultures
Thesis statement: Gen...


Anonymous
Just the thing I needed, saved me a lot of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags