1. Choose two of the art works below from your textbook. Benjamin West's Death of General Wolfe on page 28, fig. 2.14.William Hartnett's A Smoke Backstage on page 9, fig. 1.10.Georgia O'Keeffe's Jack-in-the-Pulpit No. V on page 15, fig. 1.20.Berthe Morisot's In A Villa at the Seaside on page 24, fig. 2.7.2. Use this critique form to analyse the art work you chose.CRITIQUE SHEET blank.doc See help and example below: CRITIQUE SHEET help.doc Student Example.pdf 3. Save the critique form in Word DocI don't have the text book so you can search online to see the art based on the name I provided

Facebook is a social media networking service that currently boasts over 1 billion users worldwide. For this assignment, you will analyze the Facebook page of Jacob Smith.More specifically, analyze Jacob's page using:At least three of the theories we explored in this module. Use the theories to describe what you learned about Jacob.Which of these theories do you find the easiest to apply? Why?Provide an example of a schema that Jacob demonstrates.This paper should be a minimum of 3 pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and reference). READING INFORMATION FOR ASSIGNMENT BELOW:Cultivation theory explains that regular and frequent exposure to certain types of social media information have an effect on a person's attitudes and behavior. Cultivation theorists believe that social media has effects that are small, gradual, indirect, and cumulative - they add up over time to change a person's attitudes and behaviors, kind of like a stalagmite building up on a cave floor over the years.Social learning theory explains that we learn through observation. According to social learning theory, the three pieces of this puzzle are the person, the modeled behavior, and the environment. We form a model of behaviors without needing to actually do it ourselves - we can see someone almost being hit by a car in the street and know that we need to be very careful in the street without being (nearly) hit ourselves. We can watch a YouTube video on makeup application or car repair and then go on to try the process in real life.Agenda setting theory explains that social media influences people regarding what to think about rather than what to think. This theory holds that social media influences and amplifies our existing beliefs, and that people are willing to look to social media to cue us as to where we should focus our attention. You might see this as waves of people on your social media sites tend to post about similar issues, which gets you (and them) thinking about them more and leads to more posting for a while. Then the attention goes somewhere else. For example, for a while, the gold and white / blue and black dress was lighting up social media sites (google it if you don't know), which led to a lot of discussions on visual processing and the work our brains do. Then along came the next big item on the agenda.Uses and gratification theory identifies that people look to social media to escape from challenges or be entertained. This theory assumes that people are not passive, but are actively searching out and using the information they are consuming from social media sites.Schemas are ways of organizing our world. We all have stereotypes that help us classify people and things. Schemas are not a theory, per se, but an explanation on how our memory organizes information. Jean Piaget developed the use of schemas to explain not only how we categorize our knowledge, but how we utilize that knowledge as well.For example, if someone asks you to describe a Republican or a Democrat, how would you do that? You may have a particular schema of a person belonging to one or the other political party. Your information on political parties may be extensive or limited, so how you explain a person from each party will reflect that level of expertise. If you were someone who routinely watches a particular 24-hour news network, your schema may change toward a particular party as you assimilate the new information into your original framework (schema) of that political party.In the same light, viewing the social media networks may alter or accommodate your existing schema to fit the new information.

Part A:This week you read about the women's suffrage movement and the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), two major efforts to establish equal rights for women in the United States. In your discussion post, address the following:Choose a sentence or short section from the article embedded in your webtext reading about the women's suffrage movement. Quote the sentence or section in your post. Along with this sentence or section, briefly explain how your choice illustrates the concept of historical causality.In one or two sentences, summarize the author's thesis statement about the ERA. To support your answer, quote one or two sentences from the article that convey the author's central point.Part B:Respond to your peers by comparing one of their selections to your own. Reflect on the similarities and differences between the conclusions you each made based on the evidence you selected.Post 1: On September 30, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson gives a speech before Congress in support of guaranteeing women the right to vote. Although the House of Representatives had approved a 19th constitutional amendment giving women suffrage, the Senate had yet to vote on the measure. One important part of that effort was the campaign for women suffrage, the women won the right to vote after 70 years of campaigning suffrage which later became the National Woman’s Party. The women found that they had a right to vote, women saw the Nineteenth Amendment ratified in 1920—but why was this Amendment finally approved? On May 21, 1919, U.S. Representative James R. Mann, a Republican from Illinois and chairman of the Suffrage Committee, proposed the House resolution to approve the Susan Anthony Amendment granting women the right to vote. The measure passed the House 304 to 89—a full 42 votes above the required two-thirds majority. Two weeks later, on June 4, 1919, the U.S. Senate passed the 19th Amendment by two votes over its two-thirds required majority, 56-25. The amendment was then sent to the states for ratification.Post 2: This section from the journal article that caught my attention and seems to describe a point of historical causality about the women’s suffrage movement. “Passage of the women’s suffrage and national prohibition amendments required prolonged effort, but both were achieved in the immediate aftermath of World War I. They were two extraordinary achievements of national political consensus at the time, a fact obscured by the shift in attitudes toward prohibition that led to its even more remarkable repeal fourteen years later. As a result of the adoption and implementation of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Amendments, the sense that constitutional amendment could effect social change rooted itself deeply in feminist political consciousness (Kyvig, 1996)”. Society and social ideals, malleable by executed amendments, is direct historical causality. Due to the passing of these amendments, society accepts them over time and thus changes the perspective of society. Therefore, the modification occurs on account of a historical event. The author’s main argument is that history is more than just the past and there are lessons in history to be learned from. To have an understanding of the past is to interpret events and facts and apply that knowledge to today. Relative to the author’s point, this part of the article stood out to me. “Keeping the ERA example in mind, combatants in public policy battles would do well to learn more history, develop skills of historical reasoning and critical analysis, and see the counsel of specialists in the pertinent past (Kyvig, 1996)”.