Description
i want exactly to follow the guidelines i am attaching the file below 3000 words Assignmnet
Identify the Legal Issues between Badar an Yousuf
Analysis the Legal Issues, Give your Own augments and present some decisions in relation to law
Give your Advise to Both
Conclusion for Case Fist
Case 2nd
Identify the Legal Issues
Analysis
Advise to Minstry of Sports, Maibalah Builders, Seeb Seating Company and Abduallah
Conclusion
References Harvard and Citations also Harvard
Minum 10
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Hello. I have uploaded the copy, kindly have a look
Business Obligations 1
BUSINESS OBLIGATIONS
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Date
Business Obligations 2
Business Obligations
Introduction
Contracts entail voluntary arrangements between two or more parties and are
enforceable at law as is binding in the agreement. When parties get into a contract, the
contract agreement outlines the obligations of either party and the performance requirements
and considerations thereof. By accepting to enter into a contract through offer and
acceptance, both [parties bind themselves in their respective obligations. Any breach of the
agreed obligations, therefore, amounts to a breach of the contract. In case of a breach ion the
contract, the remedy is a legal address, restructuring of the contract of order for a specific
performance or even cancellation of the contract and a subsequent payment of damages for
breach. In the law of contract, parties in a contract are supposed to consent freely and
voluntary and must have the legal capacity to contract. As long as a person is of majority age
and is of sound mind, contracts involving such individuals are entitled to enter into a contract.
A contract entered by parties is concluded when the person whom the offer is made accepts it
and undertakes to execute the obligations of the contract (Parsons, 2015). On the other hand,
a tort simply refers to civil wrong (Case Note Legal Briefs, 2017). There exist three types of
torts which can lead to a person’s injury. When it comes to civil law, torts form basis for
lawsuits to reimburse grieving parties for whatever injury or damages that the party suffers
(Oman, 2017p. 100).
The contract law in Oman
The law of contract in Oman is a bit different from that is used in other jurisdictions.
When getting into contracts in Oman, they are bound to get complications especially when
contract parties start to perform their obligations while the final terms of the contract are
being negotiated. In Oman, the contract law provides that when a dispute arises over an
Business Obligations 3
incomplete contract, there is redress to determine when the contract becomes binding on the
contract parties. The law in Oman in some circumstances imputes an existence of a contract
even when a contract agreement has not been signed. For instance, if an employer in employs
an individual without formal paperwork, the law of contract looks at alternative evidence of a
contract such as pay slips and any relevant documenting in deciding whether there was a
contract. Therefore in Oman, a contract can be enforceable at law basing on the exchange of
letters or any form of verbal offer and or acceptance of any other form of mutual trading and
conduct between the contract parties. The law of contract in Oman is supported by article 89
of the civil code of Egypt that provides that contracts are created from the moment two
parties exchange their concordant intentions. The intentions of the contract may be by way of
writing, conduct or verbally. It is also notable that the Egyptian law on the contract has a
great influence on the law of contract and legal justice in the Arab world and thus has a big
influence in the contract law in Oman (Oman, 2017p. 100).
Case analysis
In the case analysis involving the contract between MR Bandar and Mr. Yusuf there is
a binding contract between the two parties and therefore each party is entitled to execute the
performance obligations of the contract thereof. Despite there being no written consent
between the parties, there was an agreement between the two that Mr. Badar would perform
in a wedding party and the contractor Mr. Yusuf would meet the obligations of the contract
after Mr. Bandar has executed his performance obligations. Therefore, the contract between
the two entities was valid and therefore enforceable by law. There were an offer, an
acceptance and a commitment to execute the obligations of the contract by the contracting
parties. The requirements of the contract were also clear and explicit to both parties regarding
the performance obligation of the contracting entity. Mr. Badar did not execute the contract
as required due to unavoidable circumstances. This was clearly a breach of contract. On the
Business Obligations 4
part of Mr. Yusuf, he out-rightly considered the non-performance by Badar on the contract
obligations a beach of the contract requirements and obligations on performance. However,
despite the fact that the non-per...
Review
Review
