Rhetorical Analysis Essay

User Generated

zxnyv

Humanities

Description

For this assignment you will write a Rhetorical Analysis Essay. You need to read Blink by Malcolm Gladwell pages 189 through 254. You need to watch videos. Please only bid on this if you have access to the book and are familiar with rhetorical analysis .

Instructions:

  1. Read Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell.
  2. Analyze Gladwell's rhetorical strategies, noting how these strategies make his work successful and convincing or not--Your paper must have a thesis that makes an overall claim that reflects the conclusions of your analysis.
  3. Include a minimum of two (2) credible sources from the college library, in addition to the article presented and videos presented in the class, to support your ideas, making sure to cite them both in your paper and on a works cited page in MLA format.

Minimum requirements:

  • Three full pages minimum of essay plus a required works cited page in MLA format.
  • Two credible sources in addition to the article presented, properly cited in MLA format--remember to review the previous lesson on what qualifies as a credible, scholarly source.






The questions below will help you explore various rhetorical strategies and focus on elements that strengthen or weaken the argument. However, rhetorical analysis purpose is not to describe techniques and strategies; instead, it is to show how the key devices in an argument actually make it succeed or fail. Show readers where and why an argument makes sense and where it falls apart by quoting from the text, explaining your reasoning, and providing evidence from other texts. The hardest part of rhetorical analysis is to keep your distance as it doesn't matter whether you agree or disagree with an argument and focus only on how well/poorly the argument works. Thus, your claim should address the rhetorical effectiveness of the argument itself, NOT the opinion or position it takes and should indicate important relationships between various rhetorical components, NOT just list them. Hence, you’re not simply announcing the evidence, but analyze its significance and appropriateness.

Questions for Rhetorical Analysis

  • Who is the writer/organization? Any bias?
  • What is the major claim?
  • Who is the audience?
  • What is the purpose – To explain? To inform? To anger? Persuade? Amuse? Motivate? Explore? Sadden? Ridicule? Anger? Is there more than one purpose? Does the purpose shift at all throughout the text?
  • What is the context - the larger social or cultural context and the ongoing conversation on the topic? Reading the articles one should pay attention to the larger sense of culture, politics, and history in which the article appears; potential bias or point of view; place of publication; how the ongoing conversation affects what you think; how your own cultural, political, ethnic, or personal background affects what you believe.
  • What appeals does the argument use – emotional, logical, ethical?
  • What evidence does the writer use – facts, experts’ testimony, personal experience?
  • What claims are advanced in the argument – fact, definition, cause-and-effect, value, policy?
  • How is the argument presented? What is its organization and structure? What is the logic of its order? How does this structure create and/or constrain the text’s meaning? How does it shape the text and its argument?
  • How does the language, style or tone of the argument work to persuade an audience? The basics of style are word choice, figurative language (similes, metaphors), sentence structure, and paragraphing. How does the writer use qualifiers? (To qualify their thoughts writers use such qualifiers, for example, as sometimes, often, presumably, unless, almost) Does the writer use irony, humor, or sarcasm to be persuasive? Does the writer use a very formal tone, a highly technical vocabulary, or an impersonal voice to signal that an argument is for experts only?
  • Does the writer present his/her claim fairly addressing the opposition and providing counter arguments for their major claims?

What values and beliefs does the text promote and how they shape the argument and limit or expand the rhetorical strategies available to the writer?


Please label the cover sheet

Name: Master Muhammad

Teacher: Professor Wilson

Course: English 101

Date: 4-26-18

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello,Attached find the completed work together with the plagiarism report. Go through it and in case you need any corrections kindly let me know.All the best.
Attached.

Surname 1
Name: Master Muhammad
Teacher: Professor Wilson
Course: English 101
Date: 4-26-18

Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking
By Malcolm Gladwell
More often than not, many writings do not offer readers enough reasons to read them.
When a writer decides to fumble around words without any definite writing approach, they are
sure to lose the attention of their writers. The works of Gladwell are not such writings. His care
and choice of words make sure that he has passed the desired attention. In this analysis, the idea
is to show just how much Gladwell succeeds in doing that.
There are different fundamental aspects of writing which determine the final quality of a
written work (Rockford University). Malcolm Gladwell, in his book, Blink: The Power of
Thinking Without Thinking maximizes the use of different writing styles to provide an excellent
piece of work. The book is meant to show us just how effective making fast decisions are in
determining the truth about something. Gl...


Anonymous
Really helpful material, saved me a great deal of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags