Metasploit comes with various preconfigured backdoors and payloads both for Windows and Linux Operating Systems. These backdoors can be used to exploit flaws discovered in the source code of a host. Metasploit also comes with an additional tool set that allows the security practitioner to create custom backdoors (payloads) to be delivered by Metasploit. These custom payloads can be used to evade Anti-Virus (AV) protection and established trust relationships between information systems. Using GCU Approved Virtualization Solution and MSFVenom (MSFPayload + MSFEncode) available in Metasploit Frameworks, found in Kali Linux, create a custom payload and install that payload as a backdoor in an exploited host and establish a remote access connection verses a local login. Document findings under Phase Testing in the "PEN Testing Report Guidelines," located in the Course Materials. Refer to the SANS Institute industry-standard "Writing a Penetration Testing Report," for examples of PEN Testing Reports. Append this assignment to the PEN testing report and resubmit the report (Passive Corporate Recon + Automating Information RECON + NMap Scan + Vulnerability Assessment + Applied Exploitation using Metasploit + Custom Payload).

InstructionsBased on Module Four's articles on gender dysphoria, write a short paper about the influence of acceptance, parenting styles, and how these can directly steer a child's gender identity.Moreover, think about society today and acceptance of varied gender roles compared to the 1950s. What is different today in parenting styles compared to the 1950s? Additionally, think about the criteria and changes made in the DSM in the most recent version (DSM-5) compared to earlier, outdated versions.Also, consider and explore society's influence on gender dysphoria in your argument. Is there a direct correlation to gender identity and society or not?For additional details, please refer to the Module Four Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric document.Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 3–5 page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, oneinch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.

InstructionsYou were recently hired as an occupational safety and health consultant for Gemstone Fabricators, a medium-sized manufacturing facility that makes stainless steel counters, containers, and carts for the food prep and restaurant industries. Several years ago, Gemstone decided it wanted to become an Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration (OSHA) Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) site. It also wants to send the application to OSHA in the upcoming year. Further, there is a keen interest to align with the ANSI/AIHA Z10 standard. In going through the application submission materials, you noticed something that threw up a red flag, however. Although there was an accountability requirement specified in front-line workers’ performance evaluation documentation for safety performance, there was no such requirement in the performance evaluation documentation for supervisors, managers, or executives. Your discussions with employees also suggest that, although the employer wants the front-line workers to be heavily involved in the safety effort, they are not always sure exactly what they are supposed to be doing to help move the company’s safety programs forward. Another issue that concerns you is that the effort to implement a safety and health management systems approach appears to be somewhat piecemeal. You are finding it difficult to identify a clear Plan-Do-Check-Act approach to continuous improvement. Please compose a two-page document for your client to include your evaluation of these deficiencies along with an explanation of the significance of these problems in relation to the safety and health management systems approach. Your goal is to help the employer understand why these issues need to be attended to prior to submitting your application. In your response, be sure to do the following things: include an introduction that establishes the issues and provides necessary background information, assess the importance of establishing safety accountability measures for managers, employees, and safety professionals, appraise the assignment of safety-related job tasks, and apply the Plan-Do-Check-Act framework to resolve a safety deficiency. Your paper must be a minimum of two pages in length, and it should be in APA format. You must use a minimum of one scholarly resource. Any information from this source should be cited and referenced in accordance with APA guidelines.