Description
- Create a research question using the General Social Survey dataset that can be answered using categorical analysis.
By Day 3
Use SPSS to answer the research question. Post your response to the following:
- What is your research question?
- What is the null hypothesis for your question?
- What research design would align with this question?
- What dependent variable was used and how is it measured?
- What independent variable is used and how is it measured?
- If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect?
- Explain your results for a lay audience and further explain what the answer is to your research question.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
I was stuck on this subject and a friend recommended Studypool. I'm so glad I checked it out!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
8 pages
Cultural Diversity Revised
Students should demonstrate their understanding of cultural diversity, not only within their Students should be tasked to ...
Cultural Diversity Revised
Students should demonstrate their understanding of cultural diversity, not only within their Students should be tasked to define cultural Diversity ...
Strategic Plan Part II – Environmental Analysis and Setting Strategic Goals
Complete an environmental scan for the health care organization you chose in Week Two. Use the SWOT Analysis table. Addres ...
Strategic Plan Part II – Environmental Analysis and Setting Strategic Goals
Complete an environmental scan for the health care organization you chose in Week Two. Use the SWOT Analysis table. Address the following items:Assess the organization's internal strengths and weaknesses.Analyze the industry for opportunities and threats.Perform a SWOT analysis. A SWOT analysis helps determine performance gaps. It includes the following components:StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreatsDescribe the organization's present and prospective customers.Evaluate the impact of the following factors:Consumer and socialCompetitiveTechnologicalEconomicLegal and regulatorySubmit the SWOT analysis as a Microsoft® Excel® attachment.Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word report in which you:Evaluate the significance and implications of an external environmental analysis in the development of a strategic plan. For your evaluation:Explain the purpose of environmental analysis.Describe possible implications of environmental analysis in the creation of your strategic plan.Analyze evolving external issues that can have an impact on the strategic plan.Evaluate benefits of competitive analysis as part of the strategic planning process.Based on your SWOT analysis, provide an assessment of your chosen organization in which you:Evaluate the organization's ability to accomplish its mission, goals, and objectives as set in previous strategic plans.Evaluate the organization's ability to respond to internal and external changes and challenges.Incorporate your SWOT analysis findings into clearly stated goals and objectives for a 3- to 5-year period, focusing on your strategic plan areas.You will have two to three goals for each year, with two to three measurable objectives for each goal.Goals may span several years.Outline your goals and objectives clearly and provide a narrative explanation for each of them.Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar resources to support your information.Format your paper according to APA guidelines.
Capella University Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP Discussion Questions
Part A Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP 4-6 pages with References Instructions Write a paper in which you app ...
Capella University Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP Discussion Questions
Part A Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP 4-6 pages with References Instructions Write a paper in which you apply the first four steps of the EBP process in relation to the health care challenges presented in the Vila Health: The Best Evidence for a Healthcare Challenge multimedia simulation and readings. Use APA Style Your paper should be 4–6 pages in length, not including the title page and references page. Assignment Grading Construct a PICO(T) question (step 1 in the EBP process). Summarize the PICO(T) components of the health care challenges presented in the following Vila Health scenario and qualitative research study, and write a PICO(T) question: Vila Health: The Best Evidence for a Health Care Challenge. Carlfjord, S., Öhrn, A., & Gunnarsson, A. (2018). Experiences from ten years of incident reporting in health care: A qualitative study among department managers and coordinators. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 1–9. Your PICO(T) question will be the basis of your search for additional research evidence. Implement a search strategy for the best evidence (step 2 in the EBP process). Search for one quantitative study that supports the Chief Nursing Officer's suggested intervention or an alternative intervention. Base your search strategy on your PICO(T) question and on appropriate study methods and designs with the best evidence. Describe your search strategy, and explain how you determined it would lead to finding the best evidence for your PICO(T) question. What databases did you search? What search terms were most effective? What's your rationale for concluding that you've found the best evidence? Identify and summarize the study you found for this purpose. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence in both the qualitative and quantitative research studies, in relation to the health care challenge (step 3 in the EBP process). Conduct a rapid critical appraisal of the study provided by the CNO and the quantitative study you found in your search. Consider the research design and methods in relation to the evidence presented when you choose an appropriate critical appraisal tool and complete the appraisal for each study. Interpret the evidence and its implications, in relation to the health care challenge (step 4 in the EBP process). Synthesize all of the evidence, including research evidence, organizational evidence/data, and staff perceptions. Explain why the quantitative study you found and (or) the CNO's study contains the best evidence for your PICO(T) question. Recommend a strategy to implement the evidence-based intervention in your PICO(T) question (also part of step 4 in the EBP process). Support your recommended strategy with a synthesis of the evidence presented in the studies and (or) additional relevant and timely resources. Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of the studies to improve practice. Reflect on how you and other health care professionals can improve practice, based on your interpretation of the implications of these studies. This part of your paper extends beyond the steps of the EBP process to address how interprofessional collaboration and communication can lead to improvements in health care. Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings. Part B Evidence-Based Leadership and Motivating Change 2-3 pages with references Evidence-Based Leadership As a leader in a health care organization, you will need to engage in evidence-based leadership, serve as a role model for evidence-based decision making, and implement interventions and initiatives to create and sustain an evidence-based organization. Describe interventions necessary to facilitate the behavioral change of staff and providers to create an evidence-based culture in an organization. Explain, based on the four leadership styles discussed in the textbook on pages 334–337, which style you think you might use to support evidence-based processes at your organization. Provide an example from your own role where you would have an opportunity to promote evidence-based decision-making. Part C Communicating and Disseminating Evidence – 4-6 pages with references Instructions Write a paper in which you complete the steps of the EBP process and promote a culture of evidence. Paper Format and Length Format your paper using APA style. Title page and references page. An abstract is not required. A running head on all pages. Appropriate section headings. Your paper should be 4–6 pages in length, not including the title page and references page. Analyze the outcomes of an evidence-based intervention (step 5 in the EBP process). Restate the PICO(T) question and provide a transition to Step 5 of the EBP process, after an evidence-based intervention was implemented and data related to the outcomes have been gathered. Review the information provided in the Vila Health: Creating a Culture of Evidence multimedia simulation, showing results from 2020 (after the intervention) compared to baseline data from 2018 and 2019 (before the intervention). Analyze both qualitative and quantitative outcomes. Develop a continuing evaluation plan in relation to the outcomes from an evidence-based intervention (still part of Step 5 of the EBP process). Discuss additional data that needs to be collected and methods for doing so. Was the data collected sufficient to show whether the intervention was successful? When, and how often, should the same or other data be collected to continue evaluating the intervention? Justify your conclusions and recommendations. Recommend strategies to disseminate outcomes and sustain the evidence-based practice improvements through collaboration with professionals in health care and other fields (Step 6 in the EBP process). Strategies could include how to teach providers or staff about EBP, how to facilitate changes in attitudes and behaviors, and how to lead change. Make recommendations about how the organization can create a culture of evidence. What evidence do you have to support your recommendations? Organize your writing so ideas flow logically, with smooth transitions. Apply selected resources to improve your writing skills. Include an appendix after your reference page in which you identify writing improvement tools or resources you’ve used. Include evidence of the use of such tools as the Personal Writing Assessment, MEAL plan, outlining, reverse outlining, and (or) other resources explaining the appropriate use of evidence. Explain how you used these tools or resources to improve your writing for this assignment. Part D APPLYING AN EBP FRAMEWORK TO IMPLEMENT A WRITING DEVELOPMENT PLAN – 4-5 pages with reference pages Assignment Grading Assess your writing strengths and weaknesses. Use the results from your writing self-assessment What are the implications of your current skill level for writing at the doctoral-level? Discuss specific writing development or improvement goals as they relate to each element in a PICO(T) question. Create a concept map that illustrates the application of an EBP model or framework to achieve your writing development or improvement goals. Identify the implementation strategies and resources needed to carry out a writing skills development plan. Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence. Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Part E The Ethics of Evidence 2-3 pages with references This discussion focuses on ethical issues and safeguards to prevent them in EBP, Quality Improvement (QI), and research. Discuss the difference between safeguards and strategies that may be employed in EBP, in QI, and in research to ensure that activities are ethically appropriate. Identify one area in your health care leadership role and one area in your current role as a doctoral learner in which potential ethical issues may arise. Answer these questions: As a health care professional, what strategies do or would you employ to ensure the ethical appropriateness of activities you undertake in your role? What strategies or safeguards will you employ to ensure the ethical appropriateness of your own doctoral project?
Case Study 6 , Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease
Case Study 6Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney DiseaseWill is a 68-year-old male with a history of hypertension. Eight ...
Case Study 6 , Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease
Case Study 6Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney DiseaseWill is a 68-year-old male with a history of hypertension. Eight months ago, he started regular dialysis therapy for ESRD. Before that, his physician was closely monitoring his condition because he had polyuria and nocturia. Soon it became difficult to manage his hypertension. He also lost his appetite, became weak, easily fatigued, and had edema around his ankles. Will debated with his physician about starting dialysis, but she insisted, before the signs and symptoms of uremia increased, the treatment was absolutely necessary.What is the difference between azotemia and uremia?Two years ago, Will’s physician told him to decrease his protein intake. In spite of what the physician ordered, Will could not stop having chicken, beef, pork, or eggs at least once a day. Why did his physician warn him about his diet?Will’s feelings of weakness and fatigue are symptoms of anemia. Why is he anemic?4 - 5 pages with reference pageKnowing what you do about Will’s history, why is left ventricular dysfunction a concern for his physician?RequirementsMake sure all of the topics in the case study have been addressed.Cite at least three sources; journal articles, textbooks or evidenced-based websites to support the content.All sources must be within five years.Do not use .com, Wikipedia, or up-to-date, etc., for your sources.
The Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in Azerbaijan
The
Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in
Azerbaijan
The Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in Azerbaijan
The
Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in
Azerbaijan
NURS 6003 Aspen University Academic and Professional MSN Resources Research Analysis
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to ...
NURS 6003 Aspen University Academic and Professional MSN Resources Research Analysis
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.To Prepare:Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module's Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.The Assignment:Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:Your topic of interest.A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the templateWrite a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.Submit your analysis, including your completed section of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections and your matrix and summary.RUBRIC ExcellentGoodFairPoorUsing the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· The topic of interest you have selected.· Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.18 (18%) - 20 (20%)The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected.The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.16 (16%) - 17 (17%)The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected.The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.14 (14%) - 15 (15%)The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.0 (0%) - 13 (13%)The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.· Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.18 (18%) - 20 (20%)The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.16 (16%) - 17 (17%)The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.14 (14%) - 15 (15%)The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.0 (0%) - 13 (13%)The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.41 (41%) - 45 (45%)The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.36 (36%) - 40 (40%)The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided.32 (32%) - 35 (35%)The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.0 (0%) - 31 (31%)The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing.The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Total Points: 100
Similar Content
Campaign Addressing Stress among Students
Open the attached document and follow the instructions. Application Length- your application should be no more than one pa...
Saudi Electronic University Digestive System & Swallowing Tube Presentation
I want a beautifully designed PPT presentation with visuals and effectsIt consists of 14 slidesThe first title and names(T...
Lehigh Carbon Community College Health Education on Cardiovascular PPT
My presentation is on cardiovascular educating 45years-65years. Teaching and educating them on cardiovascular. I want the...
discussion
100 wordsArguably, one of the most influential servant leaders of our time has been Nelson Mandela. What characteristics o...
Bowie State University Nursing Research Methods Essay
Advanced registered nursing graduates are entering the profession at dynamic time when roles and scope of practice are shi...
History of Ulcerative Colitis Questions
Quest.. An 18 year old female presents..
Ans.. a history of ulcerative colitis
quest.. a patient is taking gentamicin..
an...
20200525165232sdlp Template To Use For Unit 10 Assignment 1
Remember to cite at least 3 sources within the body of your paper Incorporation of this template was a requirement for thi...
Hospital Nurse Staff Models
The most critical takeaway point from the articles is the shortage of nurses in the United States. Nurses make up the most...
Student S Post
It was not good for the psychiatrist to recommend that James Holmes be taken to isolated confinement. According to Psychol...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Aftermath
by Rhidian Brook
The Age Of Light
by Whitney Scharer
The Remains Of The Day
by Kazuo Ishiguro
Invisible Man
by Ralph Ellison
The Catcher in the Rye
by J. D. Salinger
The Calcutta Chromosome
by Amitav Ghosh
The Turn of the Screw
by Henry James
Wuthering Heights
by Emily Brontë
Crippled America
by Donald J Trump
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
8 pages
Cultural Diversity Revised
Students should demonstrate their understanding of cultural diversity, not only within their Students should be tasked to ...
Cultural Diversity Revised
Students should demonstrate their understanding of cultural diversity, not only within their Students should be tasked to define cultural Diversity ...
Strategic Plan Part II – Environmental Analysis and Setting Strategic Goals
Complete an environmental scan for the health care organization you chose in Week Two. Use the SWOT Analysis table. Addres ...
Strategic Plan Part II – Environmental Analysis and Setting Strategic Goals
Complete an environmental scan for the health care organization you chose in Week Two. Use the SWOT Analysis table. Address the following items:Assess the organization's internal strengths and weaknesses.Analyze the industry for opportunities and threats.Perform a SWOT analysis. A SWOT analysis helps determine performance gaps. It includes the following components:StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreatsDescribe the organization's present and prospective customers.Evaluate the impact of the following factors:Consumer and socialCompetitiveTechnologicalEconomicLegal and regulatorySubmit the SWOT analysis as a Microsoft® Excel® attachment.Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word report in which you:Evaluate the significance and implications of an external environmental analysis in the development of a strategic plan. For your evaluation:Explain the purpose of environmental analysis.Describe possible implications of environmental analysis in the creation of your strategic plan.Analyze evolving external issues that can have an impact on the strategic plan.Evaluate benefits of competitive analysis as part of the strategic planning process.Based on your SWOT analysis, provide an assessment of your chosen organization in which you:Evaluate the organization's ability to accomplish its mission, goals, and objectives as set in previous strategic plans.Evaluate the organization's ability to respond to internal and external changes and challenges.Incorporate your SWOT analysis findings into clearly stated goals and objectives for a 3- to 5-year period, focusing on your strategic plan areas.You will have two to three goals for each year, with two to three measurable objectives for each goal.Goals may span several years.Outline your goals and objectives clearly and provide a narrative explanation for each of them.Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar resources to support your information.Format your paper according to APA guidelines.
Capella University Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP Discussion Questions
Part A Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP 4-6 pages with References Instructions Write a paper in which you app ...
Capella University Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP Discussion Questions
Part A Implementing Qualitative Evidence in EBP 4-6 pages with References Instructions Write a paper in which you apply the first four steps of the EBP process in relation to the health care challenges presented in the Vila Health: The Best Evidence for a Healthcare Challenge multimedia simulation and readings. Use APA Style Your paper should be 4–6 pages in length, not including the title page and references page. Assignment Grading Construct a PICO(T) question (step 1 in the EBP process). Summarize the PICO(T) components of the health care challenges presented in the following Vila Health scenario and qualitative research study, and write a PICO(T) question: Vila Health: The Best Evidence for a Health Care Challenge. Carlfjord, S., Öhrn, A., & Gunnarsson, A. (2018). Experiences from ten years of incident reporting in health care: A qualitative study among department managers and coordinators. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 1–9. Your PICO(T) question will be the basis of your search for additional research evidence. Implement a search strategy for the best evidence (step 2 in the EBP process). Search for one quantitative study that supports the Chief Nursing Officer's suggested intervention or an alternative intervention. Base your search strategy on your PICO(T) question and on appropriate study methods and designs with the best evidence. Describe your search strategy, and explain how you determined it would lead to finding the best evidence for your PICO(T) question. What databases did you search? What search terms were most effective? What's your rationale for concluding that you've found the best evidence? Identify and summarize the study you found for this purpose. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence in both the qualitative and quantitative research studies, in relation to the health care challenge (step 3 in the EBP process). Conduct a rapid critical appraisal of the study provided by the CNO and the quantitative study you found in your search. Consider the research design and methods in relation to the evidence presented when you choose an appropriate critical appraisal tool and complete the appraisal for each study. Interpret the evidence and its implications, in relation to the health care challenge (step 4 in the EBP process). Synthesize all of the evidence, including research evidence, organizational evidence/data, and staff perceptions. Explain why the quantitative study you found and (or) the CNO's study contains the best evidence for your PICO(T) question. Recommend a strategy to implement the evidence-based intervention in your PICO(T) question (also part of step 4 in the EBP process). Support your recommended strategy with a synthesis of the evidence presented in the studies and (or) additional relevant and timely resources. Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of the studies to improve practice. Reflect on how you and other health care professionals can improve practice, based on your interpretation of the implications of these studies. This part of your paper extends beyond the steps of the EBP process to address how interprofessional collaboration and communication can lead to improvements in health care. Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings. Part B Evidence-Based Leadership and Motivating Change 2-3 pages with references Evidence-Based Leadership As a leader in a health care organization, you will need to engage in evidence-based leadership, serve as a role model for evidence-based decision making, and implement interventions and initiatives to create and sustain an evidence-based organization. Describe interventions necessary to facilitate the behavioral change of staff and providers to create an evidence-based culture in an organization. Explain, based on the four leadership styles discussed in the textbook on pages 334–337, which style you think you might use to support evidence-based processes at your organization. Provide an example from your own role where you would have an opportunity to promote evidence-based decision-making. Part C Communicating and Disseminating Evidence – 4-6 pages with references Instructions Write a paper in which you complete the steps of the EBP process and promote a culture of evidence. Paper Format and Length Format your paper using APA style. Title page and references page. An abstract is not required. A running head on all pages. Appropriate section headings. Your paper should be 4–6 pages in length, not including the title page and references page. Analyze the outcomes of an evidence-based intervention (step 5 in the EBP process). Restate the PICO(T) question and provide a transition to Step 5 of the EBP process, after an evidence-based intervention was implemented and data related to the outcomes have been gathered. Review the information provided in the Vila Health: Creating a Culture of Evidence multimedia simulation, showing results from 2020 (after the intervention) compared to baseline data from 2018 and 2019 (before the intervention). Analyze both qualitative and quantitative outcomes. Develop a continuing evaluation plan in relation to the outcomes from an evidence-based intervention (still part of Step 5 of the EBP process). Discuss additional data that needs to be collected and methods for doing so. Was the data collected sufficient to show whether the intervention was successful? When, and how often, should the same or other data be collected to continue evaluating the intervention? Justify your conclusions and recommendations. Recommend strategies to disseminate outcomes and sustain the evidence-based practice improvements through collaboration with professionals in health care and other fields (Step 6 in the EBP process). Strategies could include how to teach providers or staff about EBP, how to facilitate changes in attitudes and behaviors, and how to lead change. Make recommendations about how the organization can create a culture of evidence. What evidence do you have to support your recommendations? Organize your writing so ideas flow logically, with smooth transitions. Apply selected resources to improve your writing skills. Include an appendix after your reference page in which you identify writing improvement tools or resources you’ve used. Include evidence of the use of such tools as the Personal Writing Assessment, MEAL plan, outlining, reverse outlining, and (or) other resources explaining the appropriate use of evidence. Explain how you used these tools or resources to improve your writing for this assignment. Part D APPLYING AN EBP FRAMEWORK TO IMPLEMENT A WRITING DEVELOPMENT PLAN – 4-5 pages with reference pages Assignment Grading Assess your writing strengths and weaknesses. Use the results from your writing self-assessment What are the implications of your current skill level for writing at the doctoral-level? Discuss specific writing development or improvement goals as they relate to each element in a PICO(T) question. Create a concept map that illustrates the application of an EBP model or framework to achieve your writing development or improvement goals. Identify the implementation strategies and resources needed to carry out a writing skills development plan. Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence. Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Part E The Ethics of Evidence 2-3 pages with references This discussion focuses on ethical issues and safeguards to prevent them in EBP, Quality Improvement (QI), and research. Discuss the difference between safeguards and strategies that may be employed in EBP, in QI, and in research to ensure that activities are ethically appropriate. Identify one area in your health care leadership role and one area in your current role as a doctoral learner in which potential ethical issues may arise. Answer these questions: As a health care professional, what strategies do or would you employ to ensure the ethical appropriateness of activities you undertake in your role? What strategies or safeguards will you employ to ensure the ethical appropriateness of your own doctoral project?
Case Study 6 , Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease
Case Study 6Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney DiseaseWill is a 68-year-old male with a history of hypertension. Eight ...
Case Study 6 , Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease
Case Study 6Acute Renal Injury and Chronic Kidney DiseaseWill is a 68-year-old male with a history of hypertension. Eight months ago, he started regular dialysis therapy for ESRD. Before that, his physician was closely monitoring his condition because he had polyuria and nocturia. Soon it became difficult to manage his hypertension. He also lost his appetite, became weak, easily fatigued, and had edema around his ankles. Will debated with his physician about starting dialysis, but she insisted, before the signs and symptoms of uremia increased, the treatment was absolutely necessary.What is the difference between azotemia and uremia?Two years ago, Will’s physician told him to decrease his protein intake. In spite of what the physician ordered, Will could not stop having chicken, beef, pork, or eggs at least once a day. Why did his physician warn him about his diet?Will’s feelings of weakness and fatigue are symptoms of anemia. Why is he anemic?4 - 5 pages with reference pageKnowing what you do about Will’s history, why is left ventricular dysfunction a concern for his physician?RequirementsMake sure all of the topics in the case study have been addressed.Cite at least three sources; journal articles, textbooks or evidenced-based websites to support the content.All sources must be within five years.Do not use .com, Wikipedia, or up-to-date, etc., for your sources.
The Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in Azerbaijan
The
Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in
Azerbaijan
The Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in Azerbaijan
The
Effect of Maternal Healthcare on the Probability of Child Survival in
Azerbaijan
NURS 6003 Aspen University Academic and Professional MSN Resources Research Analysis
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to ...
NURS 6003 Aspen University Academic and Professional MSN Resources Research Analysis
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.To Prepare:Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module's Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.The Assignment:Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:Your topic of interest.A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the templateWrite a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.Submit your analysis, including your completed section of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections and your matrix and summary.RUBRIC ExcellentGoodFairPoorUsing the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· The topic of interest you have selected.· Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.18 (18%) - 20 (20%)The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected.The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.16 (16%) - 17 (17%)The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected.The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.14 (14%) - 15 (15%)The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.0 (0%) - 13 (13%)The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.· Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.18 (18%) - 20 (20%)The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.16 (16%) - 17 (17%)The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.14 (14%) - 15 (15%)The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.0 (0%) - 13 (13%)The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.41 (41%) - 45 (45%)The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.36 (36%) - 40 (40%)The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided.32 (32%) - 35 (35%)The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.0 (0%) - 31 (31%)The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing.The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Total Points: 100
Earn money selling
your Study Documents