Case Analysis: Aviation Environmental Issues

User Generated

fqqfqffff

Writing

Description

Your fourth case analysis is due at the end of this module. For this assignment, you will develop a formal 2-3 page paper/essay on aviation environmental issues. Your paper should follow the APA format and be grammatically sound and free of spelling errors. The paper should be written in the third person and double-spaced including a cover page with your name, date of submission, and the topic and appendix. Review the Aviation Environmental Issues Case Analysis Guidelines for additional information about this assignment.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

ASCI 202 Introduction to Aeronautical Science - Three-four pages text (maximum, include a reference page; and a title page) - Double-spaced lines - Times New Roman 12 pitch I. Review materials from outside sources regarding the case II. Diagnose the case (identify the issue/problem, define the significance of the issue/problem) III. “Size-up” the case (determine the influence of the issue/problem, decide what was done well, and identify what could be improved) IV. Provide recommendations (identify courses of action; what would you do differently?) Develop a case analysis on this topic: Select a major U.S. commercial airport that is considered to have noise issues. Assess the effectiveness of the airport in addressing its noise problem. As always, draw upon previous module knowledge to help you conduct your analysis. Refer to the assignment guides and rubric in the activity and ensure your case analysis conforms to the assignment requirements. Use the rubric as a guide when completing this assignment. Remember to draw upon previous module knowledge to help you conduct your analysis. In order to receive full credit, assignments must be submitted by the due date. You may lose points for late submissions. No submissions accepted after the last day of the module/week. Collectively, case analyses are worth 30% of your course grade. Upon submission, your work will automatically be evaluated through the plagiarism detection tool. Ensure your work is entirely your own. Cite your sources! (Insert Student Name) ASCI 202 Introduction to Aeronautical Science (Insert Date) Case Analysis – Aviation Environmental Issues I. Summary II. Problem III. Significance of the problem IV. Development of Alternative Actions Alternative Action 1. Advantages. Disadvantages. Alternative Action 2. Advantages. Disadvantages. V. Recommendation References Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University College of Aeronautics Undergraduate Studies Case Analysis Grading Rubric Criteria Superior 9 to 10 points Summary Provides an exemplary summary and develops a coherent, central theme that is supported in a wellstructured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout. . Above Average 8 to 9 points Provides an effective summary and develops a coherent, central theme that is supported in a wellstructured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout. Average Below Average 7 to 8 points Failure 0 to 6 points 6 to 7 points Provides a sufficient summary and develops some level of a central theme that is expressed in an acceptably organized manner. Provides minimal summary that lacks any coherent, central theme; illogical structure and organization. Provides a dissatisfactory summary that lacks any coherent, central theme; illogical structure and organization. 14 to 16 points 18 to 20 points Problem Statement Significance of the Problem 16 to 18 points Comprehensively identifies and isolates one specific problem. Identifies factors contributing to the problem with accurate details. Substantiates problem statement with external source(s). Identifies and isolates one specific problem. Identifies some factors contributing to the problem with accurate details. Substantiates problem statement with external source(s). 18 to 20 points 16 to 18 points Clearly establishes the significance of the problem statement. Presents a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks. Presents accurate outcome predictions that support immediate action to resolve the problem. Identifies outside sources of support. Establishes the significance of the problem statement. Presents a well-supported argument based on relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks. Presents outcome predictions that support immediate action to resolve the problem while using some outside sources of support. Page 1 of 3 – CoA_Case_Analysis_UG_Rubric_v1 12 to 14 points Identifies and isolates a problem with some evidence of contributing factors. May be lacking substantive support of the problem statement. Uses assumptions and has missing information that are not revealed and addressed at any level. . 14 to 16 points A valid argument with at least some reference to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks is present; exhibits thoughtfulness; makes some effort towards predicting outcomes. 0 to 12 points Writing generally shows minimal evidence the student has done the required research and analysis, consisting instead of opinions, feelings and impressions. Writing generally shows no evidence the student has done the required research and analysis, consisting instead of opinions, feelings and impressions. 12 to 14 points 0 to 12 points Arguments presented, if any, are mostly from opinion and not from evidence; while containing little linkage to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks. Arguments presented, if any, are from opinion and not from evidence; while containing no linkage to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks. 18 to 20 points Alternative Actions (Two Each) Realistic approach to resolving the problem. Reasons for each alternative are clearly articulated Advantages and disadvantages are thoughtful and give cause for reflection on the results of implementing one or the other alternative action. A decision could be made solely based upon the information provided. 17 to 18 points 16 to 17 points Realistic approach to resolving the problem. Reasons for each alternative are articulated Advantages and disadvantages are somewhat thoughtful and give cause to think about the results of implementing one or the other alternative action. A decision could be made with the help of the information provided. An approach to resolving the problem is provided. Reasons for each alternative are provided. Advantages and disadvantages are present. Outcome of implementing one alternative or the other is not clear. A decision could possibly be made based upon the help information provided. 15 to 16 points A decision based upon either alternative would be difficult to make without additional information. 0 to 15 points A decision based upon either alternative would be not be possible without additional information. 9 to 10 points Recommendation Creative approach to resolving the problem. Reason is clearly out of the ordinary. Advantage and disadvantage are thought provoking. Answers the question "What if we tried something completely different"? A decision to implement could probably only be made by someone who believes it is easier to get forgiveness than it is to get permission. 8 to 9 points 7 to 8 points A good approach to resolving the problem. Reason to support the approach is well supported. Advantage and disadvantage are well thought out. Answers the question "What if we tried something different"? A decision to implement could probably only be made from these actions. 8 to 9 points Mechanics 9 to 10 points 0 to 6 points Realistic approach to resolving the problem is barely present. Rationale lacks articulation. Advantage and disadvantage are illogical. A decision could not be made without clarification from the analyst. Realistic approach to resolving the problem is not present. Rationale lacks articulation. Advantage and disadvantage are not present. A decision could not be made using these actions. 7 to 8 points 0 to 6 points Uses proper APA citations and references with very small errors found. Still grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors, follows required formatting rules; and fully addresses given assignment. Citations are sometimes missing and/or are incorrect; an acceptable level of writing is exhibited, even with a few mechanical mistakes, but the communication is clear nonetheless. Very little support of citation; grammar, spelling, and/or word choice errors are frequent enough that the communication is muddled. 9 to 10 points 7 to 8 points 5 to 6 points 3 to 4 points 0 to 2 points The case analysis strongly accomplished all 6 of the The case analysis accomplished the majority The case analysis accomplished some of the 6 The case analysis accomplished little of the 6 The case analysis accomplished none of the 6 Uses proper APA citations and references; grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors, follows required formatting rules; and fully addresses given assignment. Accomplishment of Research Learning A somewhat more realistic approach to resolving the problem is provided. Reason is provided. Advantage and disadvantage are present. Outcome of implementation is positive. A decision could possibly be made based upon the information provided. 6 to 7 points Page 2 of 3 – CoA_Case_Analysis_UG_Rubric_v1 6 to 7 points Lack of any sort of citation. Grammar, spelling, and/or word choice errors are frequent enough that the communication is incomprehensible. Outcomes SLO’s for Research and strongly supports the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. of the 6 SLO’s for Research and supports the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. Page 3 of 3 – CoA_Case_Analysis_UG_Rubric_v1 SLO’s for Research and satisfactorily supports the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. SLO’s for Research and does not satisfactorily support the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan. SLO’s for Research and does not satisfactorily support the institutions Research Quality Enhancement Plan.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: CASE ANALYSIS OF O’HARE AIRPORT ON NOISE ISSUES

(Insert Student Name)

ASCI 202
Introduction to Aeronautical Science

(Insert Date)

Case Analysis – Aviation Environmental Issues

1

CASE ANALYSIS OF O’HARE AIRPORT ON NOISE ISSUES

2

I. Summary
Of all the environmental concerns that airports create, noise pollution is a major issue which
requires to be addressed. It is for this reason that this case analysis seeks to address this nuisance.
O’ hare is among the noisiest airport in the United States. This airport is part of Chicago
franchise and it has drawn a lot of concerns for Chicagoans. The airport has risen over the ranks
to be the leading noise emitter in the United States. This was not the case until 2015 when two
runways were opened on the east-west side of the airport attracting more flights. Despite the
huge capital used during the expansion, locals on the northwest side of Edison park, edge brook,
J...


Anonymous
Just what I was looking for! Super helpful.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags