Description
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
I was stuck on this subject and a friend recommended Studypool. I'm so glad I checked it out!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
UG Factors Essential in Attaining Esteemed Interpersonal Communication Essay
Effective CommunicationundefinedThe Joint Commission reported that [poor] communication was the root cause of 66% of Senti ...
UG Factors Essential in Attaining Esteemed Interpersonal Communication Essay
Effective CommunicationundefinedThe Joint Commission reported that [poor] communication was the root cause of 66% of Sentinel Events between 1995-2005. Examine the communication and collaboration in your workplace. Include these aspects:undefined The components necessary for effective interpersonal communication. Discuss the importance of interprofessional collaboration. Apply components of interpersonal communication to interprofessional collaboration. Discuss strategies to promote interprofessional collaboration. Describe effective strategies to build interprofessional teams. Cultural competence undefinedAssignment Expectations:undefinedLength: Between 1500 and 2000 wordsundefinedStructure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.undefinedReferences: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. You should utilize at least two scholarly sources in addition to your textbook.
Los Angeles Valley College Embryonic Stem Cell and Healthcare Access Questions
1.------Recall this week's presentation. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that tr ...
Los Angeles Valley College Embryonic Stem Cell and Healthcare Access Questions
1.------Recall this week's presentation. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ?How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them?\2-------How do you define privacy?Do you believe privacy is a moral right? Why or why not?Are there any cases in which public health policy justifies the violation of the right to privacy?3--------Some consider fair access to health care a moral right, while others disagree. We have defined the term moral right as "a privilege to act in some specific, intentional manner or to obtain some specific benefit because one is a moral agent living in a community of moral agents under a shared moral standard."Is access to health care a moral right?Why or why not?4-------Stem cells are undifferentiated, primitive cells with the ability both to multiply and to differentiate into specific kinds of cells. Stem cells hold the promise of allowing researchers to grow specialized cells or tissue, which could be used to treat injuries or disease (e.g., spinal cord injuries, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, strokes, burns)." (Slevin, 2010)Choose ONE of the following issues and post to its thread with supporting evidence. Discuss what you feel are the potential benefits of stem cell research for Alzheimer's patients and their families.Share your perspective on the stem cell debate regarding donation of surplus embryos to couples for “embryo adoption.”Why is the task of disposing unused frozen human embryos different from disposing of other medical tissue?Discuss why you think embryonic stem cell research “crosses a moral boundary.”
Indiana Institute of Technology AHIMA Data Quality Management Model Discussion
Access the AHIMA Data Quality Management Model through a Google search or via the following link: http://library.ahima.or ...
Indiana Institute of Technology AHIMA Data Quality Management Model Discussion
Access the AHIMA Data Quality Management Model through a Google search or via the following link: http://library.ahima.org/doc?oid=105607#.WN1fXzsrLIUReview the model. Upon review, select three different data elements from the AHIMA Data Quality Model and relate the role of the HIM Director to the management of the identified data elements. How would an HIM Director factor these data elements into running reports for quality management? How would the HIM Director appropriate human resources to conduct training and education on the outcomes of these areas? How would the HIM Director associate information governance activities into the continued management of the Date elements in the PI process?Formulate your response on a WORD document. Your response should be a written essay of no less than 5-7 paragraphs in length. Follow APA guidelines, and include a cover sheet
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated una ...
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated unambiguously, and is it easy to identify?
3. Does the problem statement build a cogent, persuasive argument for the new study?
4. Does the problem have significance for nursing?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hypotheses or research questions
1. Are research questions and/or hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified? Can you infer the research question from the text? If so, what is it?
2. Are questions and hypotheses appropriately worded, with clear specification of key variables and the study population?
3. Are the questions/hypotheses consistent with the literature review and the conceptual framework?
1.
2.
3.
Literature Review
1. Is the literature review up to date and based mainly on primary sources?
2. Does the review provide a state-of-the-art synthesis of evidence on the problem?
3. Does the literature review provide a sound basis for the new study?
1.
2.
3.
Method, Protection of human rights
1. Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study externally reviewed by an IRB/ethics review board?
2. Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?
1.
2.
Research Design
1. Was the most rigorous possible design used, given the study purpose?
2. Were appropriate comparisons made to enhance interpretability of the findings?
3. Was the number of data collection points appropriate?
4. Did the design minimize biases and threats to the internal, construct, and external validity of the study (e.g., was blinding used, was attrition minimized)?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Population and Sample
1. Is the population described? Is the sample described in sufficient detail?
2. Was the best possible sampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were sampling biases minimized?
3. Was the sample size adequate? Was a power analysis used to estimate sample size needs?
1.
2.
3.
Data Collection and Measurement
1. Are the operational and conceptual definitions congruent?
2. Were key variables operationalized using the best possible method (e.g., interviews, observations, and so on) and with adequate justification?
3. Are specific instruments adequately described and were they good choices, given the study purpose, variables being studied, and the study population?
4. Does the report provide evidence that the data collection methods yielded data that were reliable and valid?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Procedures
1. If there was an intervention, is it adequately described, and was it rigorously developed and implemented? Did most participants allocated to the intervention group actually receive it? Is there evidence of intervention fidelity?
2. Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?
1.
2.
Results, Data Analysis
1. Were analyses undertaken to address each research question or test each hypothesis?
2. Were appropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of the variables, number of groups being compared, and assumptions of the tests?
3. Was the most powerful analytic method used (e.g., did the analysis help to control for confounding variables)?
4. Were Type I and Type II errors avoided or minimized?
5. Were problems of missing values evaluated and adequately addressed?
6. Is information about statistical significance presented? Is information about effect size and precision of estimates (confidence intervals) presented?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Findings and Interpretation
1. Are the findings adequately summarized, with good use of tables and figures?
2 Are interpretations well-founded and consistent with the study’s limitations?
3. Does the report address the issue of the generalizability of the findings?
4. Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research—and are those implications reasonable and complete?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Researcher Credibility
1. Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?
1.
Summary Assessment
2. Despite any limitations, do the study findings appear to be valid—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
3. Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?
2.
3.
MN504 Discussion Board, health and medicine homework help
Discussion Board:(Minimum of 200 words, 3 references (2012-2017), times new roman, font, APA Style)Topic 1: Collaboration ...
MN504 Discussion Board, health and medicine homework help
Discussion Board:(Minimum of 200 words, 3 references (2012-2017), times new roman, font, APA Style)Topic 1: Collaboration for Research and Evidence-based PracticeConsider the role of the nurse as an interdisciplinary team member in completing research and using research findings to inform health care practices.Review the following.Women’s Health Initiative retrieved from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/whi Collaborative strategies to enhance research and evidence-based practice. (see Journal uploaded below) Answer the following questions.Discuss the role of the advanced practice nurse as an interdisciplinary research collaborator and member of the interdisciplinary team obligated to co-participate in the implementation and use of evidence-based practice.End your discussion by providing an example of an evidence-based change that would require the collaborative efforts of nursing and at least two other healthcare disciplines and that would lead to quality improvement in healthcare.** Reference for the Attachment / Upload below: **Engelke, M., & Marshburn, D. (2006). Collaborative strategies to enhance research and evidence-based practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration, Mar; 36(3), 131–135.
Cardiac Case Study
A 53 year old African American man is in for follow up of his elevated blood pressure. He was seen last week in your offic ...
Cardiac Case Study
A 53 year old African American man is in for follow up of his elevated blood pressure. He was seen last week in your office for a Department of Transportation commercial driver’s examination where his blood pressure was 176/92. Subjective questioning is negative. BP today is 174/94.
His physical exam is remarkable for a loud S2, sustained PMI at 5icslmcl, an S4 gallop is present. The remainder of his physical exam is unremarkable.
Family history is remarkable for high blood pressure.
Self describes his lifestyle as pretty sedentary due to driving long hours every day. Diet is often fast food with many cups of coffee.
EKG – NSR with LVH by voltage
CBC – normal
CBP – normal except for glucose 154 (fasting). Fingerstick last week was 152
A1C – 7.8
1.List 5 subjective questions it would be very important to know about this patient.
2.Explain the significance of the loud S2 finding.
3.What does the finding of his PMI indicate?
4.Explain the significance of the PMI in the normal location.
5.Explain the significance of the S4 finding.
6.Explain the finding of LVH given his current circumstances.
7.What additional diagnostics or testing (if any) you would like to order?
8.What are the top two diagnoses you are going to address at this time?
9.What is your pharmacologic plan for this man? Why did you choose the agent you did? Be sure to state your rationale and references.
10.Identify 5 lifestyle modifications to improve his health that he could implement in his current situation.
Similar Content
WCU Violation of Her Rights if We Continued with The Chemotherapy Case Study
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1e2HDqwwmJJN6JSnbF...
Writing prompt: What is your response to the daughter in this scen...
APUS Health & Medical Physician Assisted Suicide Discussion
Select ONLY ONE question listed below to write an essay:
1. Should terminally ill individuals have the right to ask for "p...
mod 8 reflection
Read the article and write approximately a 250-500 word reflection on your takeaways on how mental illness affects healthc...
Obstetrics, health and medicine homework help
Define biophysical profile in 50 words...
juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, health and medicine homework help
presentation on juvenile rheumatoid arthritis...
Ashford University Concept Map Worksheet
Identify a patient case to build this concept map for. You may use a current patient, such as from an on-ground DFC, or a ...
Responses
Thank you for your informative discussion. I agree with you that World Health Organization (WHO) comprises of healthcare p...
Summary Of Two Assignments
The first assignment correcting pH after a cardiac arrest contains three articles. The first one focuses on post-cardiac a...
Dialysis
Dialysis is a term which refers to the technique that is applied to the separation of molecules or particles that are of d...
Related Tags
Book Guides
To Kill a Mockingbird
by Harper Lee
The 5 Love Languages
by Gary Chapman
2001 A Space Odyssey
by Arthur Clarke
The President is Missing
by James Patterson, Bill Clinton
Unf*ck Yourself
by Gary John Bishop
All Quiet on the Western Front
by Erich Maria Remarque
Persuasion
by Jane Austen
The Fault in Our Stars
by John Green
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
UG Factors Essential in Attaining Esteemed Interpersonal Communication Essay
Effective CommunicationundefinedThe Joint Commission reported that [poor] communication was the root cause of 66% of Senti ...
UG Factors Essential in Attaining Esteemed Interpersonal Communication Essay
Effective CommunicationundefinedThe Joint Commission reported that [poor] communication was the root cause of 66% of Sentinel Events between 1995-2005. Examine the communication and collaboration in your workplace. Include these aspects:undefined The components necessary for effective interpersonal communication. Discuss the importance of interprofessional collaboration. Apply components of interpersonal communication to interprofessional collaboration. Discuss strategies to promote interprofessional collaboration. Describe effective strategies to build interprofessional teams. Cultural competence undefinedAssignment Expectations:undefinedLength: Between 1500 and 2000 wordsundefinedStructure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.undefinedReferences: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. You should utilize at least two scholarly sources in addition to your textbook.
Los Angeles Valley College Embryonic Stem Cell and Healthcare Access Questions
1.------Recall this week's presentation. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that tr ...
Los Angeles Valley College Embryonic Stem Cell and Healthcare Access Questions
1.------Recall this week's presentation. Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ?How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them?\2-------How do you define privacy?Do you believe privacy is a moral right? Why or why not?Are there any cases in which public health policy justifies the violation of the right to privacy?3--------Some consider fair access to health care a moral right, while others disagree. We have defined the term moral right as "a privilege to act in some specific, intentional manner or to obtain some specific benefit because one is a moral agent living in a community of moral agents under a shared moral standard."Is access to health care a moral right?Why or why not?4-------Stem cells are undifferentiated, primitive cells with the ability both to multiply and to differentiate into specific kinds of cells. Stem cells hold the promise of allowing researchers to grow specialized cells or tissue, which could be used to treat injuries or disease (e.g., spinal cord injuries, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, strokes, burns)." (Slevin, 2010)Choose ONE of the following issues and post to its thread with supporting evidence. Discuss what you feel are the potential benefits of stem cell research for Alzheimer's patients and their families.Share your perspective on the stem cell debate regarding donation of surplus embryos to couples for “embryo adoption.”Why is the task of disposing unused frozen human embryos different from disposing of other medical tissue?Discuss why you think embryonic stem cell research “crosses a moral boundary.”
Indiana Institute of Technology AHIMA Data Quality Management Model Discussion
Access the AHIMA Data Quality Management Model through a Google search or via the following link: http://library.ahima.or ...
Indiana Institute of Technology AHIMA Data Quality Management Model Discussion
Access the AHIMA Data Quality Management Model through a Google search or via the following link: http://library.ahima.org/doc?oid=105607#.WN1fXzsrLIUReview the model. Upon review, select three different data elements from the AHIMA Data Quality Model and relate the role of the HIM Director to the management of the identified data elements. How would an HIM Director factor these data elements into running reports for quality management? How would the HIM Director appropriate human resources to conduct training and education on the outcomes of these areas? How would the HIM Director associate information governance activities into the continued management of the Date elements in the PI process?Formulate your response on a WORD document. Your response should be a written essay of no less than 5-7 paragraphs in length. Follow APA guidelines, and include a cover sheet
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated una ...
NURS 602 University of Alabama in Huntsville Quantitative Research Article Critique
1. Does the title succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
2. Is the problem stated unambiguously, and is it easy to identify?
3. Does the problem statement build a cogent, persuasive argument for the new study?
4. Does the problem have significance for nursing?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hypotheses or research questions
1. Are research questions and/or hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified? Can you infer the research question from the text? If so, what is it?
2. Are questions and hypotheses appropriately worded, with clear specification of key variables and the study population?
3. Are the questions/hypotheses consistent with the literature review and the conceptual framework?
1.
2.
3.
Literature Review
1. Is the literature review up to date and based mainly on primary sources?
2. Does the review provide a state-of-the-art synthesis of evidence on the problem?
3. Does the literature review provide a sound basis for the new study?
1.
2.
3.
Method, Protection of human rights
1. Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study externally reviewed by an IRB/ethics review board?
2. Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?
1.
2.
Research Design
1. Was the most rigorous possible design used, given the study purpose?
2. Were appropriate comparisons made to enhance interpretability of the findings?
3. Was the number of data collection points appropriate?
4. Did the design minimize biases and threats to the internal, construct, and external validity of the study (e.g., was blinding used, was attrition minimized)?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Population and Sample
1. Is the population described? Is the sample described in sufficient detail?
2. Was the best possible sampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were sampling biases minimized?
3. Was the sample size adequate? Was a power analysis used to estimate sample size needs?
1.
2.
3.
Data Collection and Measurement
1. Are the operational and conceptual definitions congruent?
2. Were key variables operationalized using the best possible method (e.g., interviews, observations, and so on) and with adequate justification?
3. Are specific instruments adequately described and were they good choices, given the study purpose, variables being studied, and the study population?
4. Does the report provide evidence that the data collection methods yielded data that were reliable and valid?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Procedures
1. If there was an intervention, is it adequately described, and was it rigorously developed and implemented? Did most participants allocated to the intervention group actually receive it? Is there evidence of intervention fidelity?
2. Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?
1.
2.
Results, Data Analysis
1. Were analyses undertaken to address each research question or test each hypothesis?
2. Were appropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of the variables, number of groups being compared, and assumptions of the tests?
3. Was the most powerful analytic method used (e.g., did the analysis help to control for confounding variables)?
4. Were Type I and Type II errors avoided or minimized?
5. Were problems of missing values evaluated and adequately addressed?
6. Is information about statistical significance presented? Is information about effect size and precision of estimates (confidence intervals) presented?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Findings and Interpretation
1. Are the findings adequately summarized, with good use of tables and figures?
2 Are interpretations well-founded and consistent with the study’s limitations?
3. Does the report address the issue of the generalizability of the findings?
4. Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research—and are those implications reasonable and complete?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Researcher Credibility
1. Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?
1.
Summary Assessment
2. Despite any limitations, do the study findings appear to be valid—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
3. Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?
2.
3.
MN504 Discussion Board, health and medicine homework help
Discussion Board:(Minimum of 200 words, 3 references (2012-2017), times new roman, font, APA Style)Topic 1: Collaboration ...
MN504 Discussion Board, health and medicine homework help
Discussion Board:(Minimum of 200 words, 3 references (2012-2017), times new roman, font, APA Style)Topic 1: Collaboration for Research and Evidence-based PracticeConsider the role of the nurse as an interdisciplinary team member in completing research and using research findings to inform health care practices.Review the following.Women’s Health Initiative retrieved from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/whi Collaborative strategies to enhance research and evidence-based practice. (see Journal uploaded below) Answer the following questions.Discuss the role of the advanced practice nurse as an interdisciplinary research collaborator and member of the interdisciplinary team obligated to co-participate in the implementation and use of evidence-based practice.End your discussion by providing an example of an evidence-based change that would require the collaborative efforts of nursing and at least two other healthcare disciplines and that would lead to quality improvement in healthcare.** Reference for the Attachment / Upload below: **Engelke, M., & Marshburn, D. (2006). Collaborative strategies to enhance research and evidence-based practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration, Mar; 36(3), 131–135.
Cardiac Case Study
A 53 year old African American man is in for follow up of his elevated blood pressure. He was seen last week in your offic ...
Cardiac Case Study
A 53 year old African American man is in for follow up of his elevated blood pressure. He was seen last week in your office for a Department of Transportation commercial driver’s examination where his blood pressure was 176/92. Subjective questioning is negative. BP today is 174/94.
His physical exam is remarkable for a loud S2, sustained PMI at 5icslmcl, an S4 gallop is present. The remainder of his physical exam is unremarkable.
Family history is remarkable for high blood pressure.
Self describes his lifestyle as pretty sedentary due to driving long hours every day. Diet is often fast food with many cups of coffee.
EKG – NSR with LVH by voltage
CBC – normal
CBP – normal except for glucose 154 (fasting). Fingerstick last week was 152
A1C – 7.8
1.List 5 subjective questions it would be very important to know about this patient.
2.Explain the significance of the loud S2 finding.
3.What does the finding of his PMI indicate?
4.Explain the significance of the PMI in the normal location.
5.Explain the significance of the S4 finding.
6.Explain the finding of LVH given his current circumstances.
7.What additional diagnostics or testing (if any) you would like to order?
8.What are the top two diagnoses you are going to address at this time?
9.What is your pharmacologic plan for this man? Why did you choose the agent you did? Be sure to state your rationale and references.
10.Identify 5 lifestyle modifications to improve his health that he could implement in his current situation.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents