WRTG 393 students, Writing assignment #1 will be a set of instructions for completing a technical process. Instruction manuals explain to readers how to operate something or make something. Helpful resources on how to write an instruction manual include the following: "Instructions, procedures, and policies," a chapter from Tebeaux and Dragga in eReserves Jerz’s literacy page features a fine set of tips on writing instructions. Please click here to view the site. David McMurrey has a very helpful website on writing instructions. Please click here to view the webpage. Wikibooks has an excellent guide to writing instructions. Please click here to view the site. Requirements The instructions will include the following sections: Title Page Overview or Introduction with necessary background information such as time needed, skill ability, relevance, context, stage setting, etc. Equipment and materials needed (as appropriate) Definitions (as appropriate) • Instructions o provide a graphic for steps of the instructions that need a graphic o at least three graphics must be original (you created) o graphics borrowed from other sources need to be cited in APA format o all graphics should be labeled Warnings or statements of caution (as appropriate) Overall, chapter 10 from Tebeaux and Dragga should be read thoroughly as you begin this assignment. Different types of instructions call for different strategies. The chapter from Tebeaux and Dragga is an excellent resource in guiding your approach. Other helpful guides on writing instructions: The Tech Writing Handbook by Dozuki, which is one of the resources listed in our class, has the following: o an appendix that provides tips in writing instructions and incorporating graphics into instructions.

Harvard style essayTopic: Discuss the strengths and weakness of electric cars in helping to limit the enhanced greenhouse effect.Introduction: start with a hook sentence, and start with background information about electric vehicles.Body 1: weaknesses and negatives of electrics vehicles.Body 2 : strengths and positives of electric vehicles.Body 3: electric vs non electric cars producing green house gasses.conclusion: summarize everythingwork cited page at the end Details : must do 2 in-text citation in each body paragraph, work cited page must be Harvard style, Times New Roman or Arial; font size 12; 1.5 line spacing, Max:2500 words, Min:2000 words, must be original not plagiarized.some links for help European Environment Agency (2018) 'EEA report confirms electric cars are better for climate and air quality' Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/eea-report-co... [Last Accessed 04.01.19] Barkenbus, J. (2017) 'Electric Cars: Climate Saviours, or Not?' Issues in Science and Technology 33 (2) Available at: https://issues.org/electric-vehicles-climate-savio... [Last Accessed 04.01.19] Hao, H., Wang, H & Ouyang, M. (2011) 'Comparison of policies on vehicle ownership and use between Beijing and Shanghai and their impacts on fuel consumption by passenger vehicles', Energy Policy. 39(2) pp1016-1021

One page discussionWalzer raises serious questions about the Supreme Emergency vs. the political need for unconditional surrender. In Chapter 16 of Just and Unjust Wars, Walzer affirms a doctrine he calls Supreme Emergency and rejects a doctrine he calls the Sliding Scale. The doctrines concern the question, how to interpret the moral right of noncombatant immunity (along with the rights and duties of combatants) in just warfare doctrine. In this chapter, Walzer examines both Nazi Germany and the Japanese aggression on Pearl Harbor in this section. The question about the English trying to destroying Nazi Germany seems fairly straight forward since Hitler was trying to conquer all of Europe and instituting genocide in all acquired German lands. Yet, even with the evils of Nazism, there are questions raised by historians about "bombing German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror... The destruction of Dresden remains a serious query against the conduct of Allied bombings." (pg 261) The attack of Japan is not as settled, since the use of atomic weapons was so unprecedented and the destruction so immense. Walzer raises the question whether the United States' attack on Japan was a Supreme Emergency or was it psychological, that the American people needed to show that they were strong and perhaps for the American leaders to prove their leadership to their constituency. Similar questions may be raised after 9/11 when America attacked Iraq. Was the extreme use of force needed to prevent an enemy from overthrowing the United States Government? In a discussion, please consider the 6 Criteria for a just war found on page 176 and apply it to the bombing of Japan during WWII. Does the bombing of Japan also constitute a Supreme Emergency triggering the need to an atomic response? Here are two contradictory reports from two respectable sources. Also use the reading from Walzer which I've provided. To Bomb Linkhttps://www.prageru.com/courses/history/was-it-wro...Not to Bomb Linkhttp://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2016/0...