Assignment Guidelines and RubricOverview: This journal activity is private between you and the instructor.This week, you learned about active reading and analysis by looking more closely at a selected reading. In doing so, you uncovered ideas in the "Turning Off, Dining In" article that may have been difficult to identify during your literal reading of the text.To prepare for this assignment, please re-read your selected article and your notes from Module 1. Then, using a Word Document, answer the following questions:Discuss the context of your selected article, the author's purpose, and the style and tone. What have you learned from this early analysis?How will a closer analysis of the author's claim and the structure of the writing help you to learn more about your selected reading?Now that you have discussed the author's purpose for writing the selected reading, do you think the author's writing is effective in achieving their purpose? What led you to this conclusion?In total, the reflection should be three fully developed paragraphs (5-8 sentences each) in length (consider one paragraph per question). As you work on the journal, remember to refer to the rubric below to make sure you're fulfilling the requirements for this assignment.Guidelines for Submission: Save your work in a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.. Then, check your writing for errors. Once you have proofread your document, submit it via the Module 2, 2-5 Journal: Importance of Analysis Assignment link in Brightspace.RubricCritical ElementsExemplary – 100%Proficient – 85%Needs Improvement – 55%Not Evident – 0%ValueContext of selected articleMeets "Proficient" criteria and discusses the context of the selected article, the author's purpose, the style, and tone and provides specific, detailed examples to illustrate analysisDiscusses the context of the selected article, the author's purpose, the style, and toneDiscusses the context of the selected article, the author's purpose, the style, and tone but response is unclear or cursoryDoes not discuss the context of the selected article, the author's purpose, the style, and tone25Analysis of author's claimMeets "Proficient" criteria provides specific, detailed examples to describe how an analysis of the author's claim and structure of the writing will help one learn more about the selected readingDescribes how an analysis of the author's claim and structure of the writing will help one learn more about the selected readingDescribes how an analysis of the author's claim and structure of the writing will help one learn more about the selected reading but leaves gaps in reasoning or clarityDoes not describe how an analysis of the author's claim and structure of the writing will help one learn more about the selected reading25Author's EffectivenessMeets "Proficient" criteria and makes clear and specific connections between author's writing choices and effectivenessExplains current assessment of author's effectiveness and what lead one to this conclusionExplains current assessment of author's effectiveness and explains what lead one to this conclusion, but response leaves gaps on reasoning or clarityDoes not explain current assessment of author's effectiveness25LengthWrites three or more fully developed paragraphs with exceptional detail that directly relate to the assignment promptWrites three developed paragraphs (5-8 sentences each) that directly relate to the assignment promptWrites three paragraphs, but content is not fully developed or does not directly relate to the assignment promptDoes not write three fully developed paragraphs (5-8 sentences each)15Articulation of ResponseJournal entry is free of errors in organization and grammarJournal entry is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar which are marginal and rarely interrupt the flowJournal entries contain errors of organization and grammar but are limited enough so that entries can be understoodJournal entry contains errors of organization and grammar making the Journal difficult to understand10CommentsEarned Total100%

InstructionsSelect a company or organization whose fairness or ethics is currently being scrutinized in the news or in social media. Provide enough background information about your selected company to convey its size and prominence in society, and then explain in detail the alleged fairness and ethics violations. Conclude your paper by choosing to support the allegations or refute them, and explain your reasoning based on what you have learned. In your discussion, be sure to include the information below. Summarize the concept of fairness as it relates to decisions. Explain how personal and business ethics can be subconsciously overridden in decision-making. Does your selected business exemplify this? Describe how the company could improve its image regarding fairness and ethics in decision-making. Your paper must be a minimum of three pages in length, and it should contain at least two academic references (one maybe the textbook). Please use APA formatting and citations.