As you approach the end of your Master of Science in Nursing program and prepare for a career as a nurse practitioner [PMHNP], you will want to create a cover letter, resume, and portfolio that best represent your knowledge, skills, and abilities as a professional in the field of nursing. For this Assignment, you will create a Career Planner, which includes these elements, that you can use as you pursue your next professional role. Photo Credit: Getty Images To Prepare Review the Career Planner Guide. This document contains the requirements for the Assignment as well as resources to consult. Seek out other resources on cover letters, resumes, and other professional resources, as needed. The Walden University Career Planning and Development site has information on many topics of relevance.   The Assignment Develop a cover letter, resume, philosophy statement, and other professional resources that meet the requirements outlined in the Career Planner Guide.

Create a 10-12-slide presentation about the role of scientist-practitioners. Include the following in your presentation:A title pageA description of the key knowledge, skills, and abilities of an effective scientist-practitionerA description of how research reports are an essential component for the scientist-practitionerA description of why data management and presentation are key components of research reportsA reference pageAt least three scholarly sourcesDetailed speaker notes that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in personWhile APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less than Satisfactory74.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good87.00%5Excellent100.00%100.0 %Content 15.0 %A description of the key knowledge, skills, and abilities of an effective scientist-practitionerPresentation omits or incompletely describes the key knowledge, skills, and abilities of an effective scientist-practitioner. Presentation does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Presentation inadequately describes the key knowledge, skills, and abilities of an effective scientist-practitioner and/or the discussion is not historically accurate. Presentation demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Presentation adequately describes the key knowledge, skills, and abilities of an effective scientist-practitioner, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Presentation clearly describes the key knowledge, skills, and abilities of an effective scientist-practitioner, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Presentation demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.Presentation expertly describes the key knowledge, skills, and abilities of an effective scientist-practitioner, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Presentation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %An explanation of how research reports are an essential component for the scientist-practitionerPresentation omits or incompletely describes how research reports are an essential component for the scientist-practitioner. Presentation does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Presentation inadequately describes how research reports are an essential component for the scientist-practitioner and/or the discussion is not historically accurate. Presentation demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Presentation adequately describes how research reports are an essential component for the scientist-practitioner, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Presentation clearly describes the how research reports are an essential component for the scientist-practitioner, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Presentation demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.Presentation expertly describes how research reports are an essential component for the scientist-practitioner, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Presentation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %A discussion about why data management and presentation are key components of research reportsPresentation omits or incompletely discusses why data management and presentation are key components of research reports. Presentation does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Presentation inadequately discusses why data management and presentation are key components of research reports and/or the discussion is not historically accurate. Presentation demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Presentation adequately discusses why data management and presentation are key components of research reports, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Presentation clearly discusses why data management and presentation are key components of research reports, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Presentation demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.Presentation expertly discusses why data management and presentation are key components of research reports and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Presentation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Presentation of ContentThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.10.0 %Speaker NotesThe presentation does not contain speaker notes.The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes.The presentation?s speaker notes are present and are generally competent.The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in person.The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that give a complete picture of what would be said if the presentation was given in person.10.0 %LayoutThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage