Reading Response #2: “The Citation Sandwich Move” Our second reading response is a chance to practice a key scholarly writing move: The “Citation Sandwich.” This three-part move is a way to fully integrate a source into your own writing, giving full context to direct quotes and explaining those quotes to your readers with analysis. For details on this concept, check out the “Citation Sandwich” handout on Canvas. For the response, you’ll want to think about individuality and gain insight into how our cultural identities inform our experiences, values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, and how they help us better understand the diversity and connections within society. Identifying Individual Culture(s): Dimensions of Diversity The primary dimensions of age, race, gender, ethnicity, (dis)abilities, sexual identity, childhood economic class and childhood religion, serve as core elements that shape our basic self-image and our fundamental view. They help form our core expectations of others in our personal and professional life.  The secondary dimensions of culture including education, income/economic status, religious beliefs (current), relationship/parental status, geographic location, and work background serve as independent influences on our self-esteem and self-definition. This influence varies with who we are, our stage of life, and changes we have experienced.  This sense of identity is explored by hundreds of writers, including those for our class. In her collection of writing, “Brown Album: Essays on Exile and Identity,” author Porochista Khakpour relates her relationship with a two-pronged identity as she shares, “I had tactics as a child: I hid inside the American costumes I wore – punk, cowgirl, starlet – and took on Persian only when I had to” (4). She continues, “Once in a while a baffled peer would ask: ‘But what’s Persian? Aren’t you from Iran? I’d spin the wheel in my brain and let the arrow land on the many somethings, anythings, I had cobbled…”  (4). We now have the opportunity to explore our own identities and see the ways in which we have shaped and reshaped them, as they have us. Getting Started  Part 1:  Think about 3 different dimensions that serve to shape your basic self-image. Choose from the options offered in “primary dimensions” and “secondary dimensions” listed above. Your choices could be those with which you have built confident relationships, or those that you are trying to comfortably unfold. Explain your relationship with those dimensions and why they are significant. These stories will be told with a personal and subjective voice. Please only share what you comfortable doing so. These will only be read by me. Part 2: Choose at least two quotes from “Brown Album” that helps highlight one or more of your experiences. You may use the quotes above if you wish, or you may choose your own. There are many excellent quotes from which you may choose. Begin your source integration by introducing the Khakpour writing for your readers. Like we’ve done previously, assume that your reader has not read the article/s. Give your readers the key info about the text, such as the full name of the writer, the title, and an overall summary of the text in your own words (basically teaching the text to your reader). Preview the idea/concept you want to quote by explaining it in your own words. From there, bring in two direct quotes from Khakpour. Don’t forget to add a signal phrase and parenthetical citation. After each quote, explain what you think the quote means and how you think it reflects the argument you are making about identity and/or self. Analyze in no less than 3-5 sentences, per quote.

Attached are the questions to the two videoshttps://www.learner.org/series/discovering-psychology/the-self/22 questions for the first videohttps://www.learner.org/series/discovering-psychology/psychopathology/27 questions for the second video

Clinical psychology as a profession is relatively new. Although human beings have been thinking about disturbances in behavior for thousands of years, it is only within the last 75 years that clinical psychology emerged as a unique specialization within psychology. During the years following World War II, psychologists working with mentally ill, developmentally disabled, and other disadvantaged populations began to think about how best to train people to work with these types of clients. The so-called Boulder model became the centerpiece of clinical psychology professional training following its inception in the early 1950s.Think about your clinical psychology program of study. Courses include Psychological Assessment, Advanced Psychopathology,Psychopharmacology, and many more. There is a strong focus on research throughout your program of study, which is emphasized by the concluding dissertation. Your program of study follows the scholar-practitioner model. How is this different from the Boulder model or scientist-practitioner model? The answer lies mainly in emphasis of how the science of psychology informs practice. The Boulder model, or scientist-practitioner model, became the centerpiece of professional psychology training following its inception in the early 1950s. More recent models, such as the scholar-practitioner model, have emerged for training psychologists, including clinical psychologists. These models share a common goal of producing practitioners who are prepared to study, assess, and intervene with individual, systemic, and societal problems and challenges.With these thoughts in mind:Post by Day 4 strengths and limitations of the training models in professional psychology (scientist-practitioner model and scholar-practitioner model). Explain why you chose a scholar-practitioner program and how this choice impacts your professional development.