1)Why is it important to evaluate sources for credibility, reliability, and bias? What are possible consequences for not evaluating sources for these items?The DQ response must be 150-200 words and have at least one citation in APA format.2) Write a 100-word response to the student in first person. Talk about how you agree and add your own thoughts. Make sure it's respectful.Students Response: All research methods such as, public speaking, philosophy, and any other course that requires college students to engage in formal writing (essay) or speaking engagement requires scholastic peer reviews (Sorenson, M. E. (2016). The rise in popularity of search engines (e.g., Google and Yahoo) and major shifts in the media scenery and literacy in a trajectory of academic research can be difficult for both students and instructors. Many students, teachers and professionals rely on the Internet, perhaps more than a library; it is mostly quick, especially in professional demands, and easier than leg work; the internet is formatted as a believable online truth. I recently learned that websites displaying a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is not a permalink or URL. Generally, are specific written digital thoughts convincing issues and not perhaps scholastically authenticated. A ‘permalink’ is a web address or ‘URL’ (“Uniform Resource Locator” of a worldwide web page) that can be connected with a book, article, and streaming media, having most likely scholastically examined for proof. This information can also be found by searching through GCU (Grand Canyon University) library references and or webinars.According to Pan et al. (2007), college students are generally relying on sources that appear at the top of a list of results, regardless the significance or credibility the internet provides. These undercover habits eventually catch up determining the credibility of the one insinuating a piece to be scholastically approved. Not necessarily does this interpret one to be lazy or lacking with skills? The consequence from an instructor and university policy violations can determine a harsh outcome if dishonesty and plagiarism are gritty, alongside and near reaching the formality of a library website or other scholarly peer reviews from the Internet (Becker, 2003). Hall (2002). Thus, it is necessary that students understand how to examine all credibility and significance of more important modern-day resources, such as up-to-date data regarding the APA, 7th edition, and other organizational websites and informative blogs (Sorenson, M.E., 2016).Reference Sorenson, M. E. (2016). Beyond the Google Search Bar: Evaluating Source Credibility in Contemporary Research. Communication Teacher, 30(2), 82–86. Rmat https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1093682&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1. DOI: 10.1080/17404622.2016.1139150.

Stark LawPrior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 7 of the textbook and the article Stark and Anti-Kickback Laws Limit Lab-Marketing Methods, and review the web page Health Care Fraud News (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., the website Stark Law (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and the handout The STARK Law. Then, review the following case study:Two physicians, Dr. S. and Dr. V., leased a nuclear camera so they would no longer have to refer their patients to the local hospital for nuclear imaging. Faced with the prospect of losing over a third of its $2,274,094 in annual gross nuclear medicine revenues, the hospital responded by threatening to revoke the doctors’ admitting privileges. Lengthy negotiations ensued, at the end of which the hospital agreed to sublease the camera from the two physicians; the camera remained at the physicians’ offices but other physicians with privileges at the hospital could use it. Four other local physicians who provided the same or similar services to patients as Dr. S. and Dr. V. brought a qui tam action alleging that the sublease violated the Anti-Kickback and Stark Acts and that the defendants falsely certified compliance with those laws in connection with claims submitted to Medicare in violation of the False Claims Act.(Please note: This is an actual court case and an Internet search may uncover the actual case details. You are prohibited from utilizing any source materials associated with this case. Use of any related materials will result in a reduction of points on this assignment. This assignment is being graded on your ability to think critically—on your own recognizance—based on your comprehension of the knowledge provided in this week’s learning materials.)Carefully review Chapter 7 of your textbook and research Stark Law. Given this scenario, Analyze whether the actions of Dr. S. and Dr. V. violated Stark Law. Explain the legal parameters for patient rights and the role that Dr. S and Dr. V play in protecting those rights. Explain the federal, statutory, or case laws that apply in this scenario. Provide solid evidence supporting your decision by utilizing information from the Ashford University Library as well as the law itself. The Stark Law paper Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style . Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. Must use at least two scholarly sources from the last five to seven years in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment. Must document any information used from sources in APA style. Must include separate references page that is formatted according to APA style

Select an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which you would like to see a practice change occur. Conduct a review of literature to see what is currently known about the topic. In 1-2 paragraphs, describe the scope and relevance of the issue and your recommended change. Provide reference support from at least two outside scholarly sources to support your ideas. No plagiarism, APA style