Description
Unlike many English language constitutions, the United States Constitution specifically provides for a mechanism for the government to involuntarily take private real property from its citizens. The only requirement that the government must show is that the taking is for a "public" purpose. There is no requirement that the taking be "necessary" or even "reasonable." Any stated government purpose suffices. If the public purpose is demonstrated, then the government, state or federal, may take the property and provide the previous owner with "fair value" or compensation for the taking.For your discussion in this module, we will use the basic debate form. The proposition set forth is this: "The United States Supreme Court taking powers for real property are just and necessary. No modifications need exist to the takings clause at this time." In your primary post, affirm or oppose the proposition.
Below is the citation that needs to be referenced if possible.
Cheeseman, H. R. (2016). Business law: Legal environment, online commerce, business ethics, and international issues. Boston: Pearson.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Similar Content
Related Tags
Faust
by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
The Magic Mountain
by Thomas Mann
Enders Game
by E. M. Forster
Murder on the Orient Express
by Agatha Christie
The Turn of the Screw
by Henry James
A Farewell To Arms
by Ernest Hemingway
The Jade Peony
by Wayson Choy
Pride and Prejudice
by Jane Austen
The Grapes of Wrath
by John Steinbeck