Your final assignment will be based on a case study related to ethics, technology, and the workplace. The case will present an ethical dilemma raised by the use of an emerging technology within the work environment. The emerging technology will be one that may have certain benefits to the organization, but at the same time may have serious drawbacks depending on one's ethical views.For purposes of the assignment, you will play the role of an employee with a key role in the organization the case study is based on. You will need to carefully consider the pros and cons of the emerging technology and write a clear, concise, and well-reasoned message to an audience of influential stakeholders* in which you advocate for the most appropriate course of action.Basic requirements:Length: about one page, single spaced (roughly 3-4 paragraphs)Style: written in the style of a formal business letterThe case study will be based on a real-life case study drawn from recent news. The case study and full response instructions will be shared at the beginning of Week 8.Please remember that the session ends on Saturday, not Sunday. As such, the assignment is due Saturday night.*Stakeholders refers to anyone who will be impacted by the decision you make. Stakeholders are not the same as shareholders--those who own shares in a company.Here is the case study:Facebook Under FireAs you've probably heard, the US government, in particular the Federal Trade Commission, along with numerous states, have filed lawsuits against Facebook. The lawsuits claim that Facebook has engaged in anti-competitive behavior, and has violated antitrust laws. In particular, they have received scrutiny for their acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. These lawsuits allege that Facebook now has a monopoly over social media, and that consumers are harmed by a lack of competition. As a remedy, the FTC and the states are advocating for the breakup of Facebook. Specifically, they want Instagram and WhatsApp to be "spun off" into separate entities that Facebook would no longer control. Most likely the lawsuits will drag on for years, and the outcome is uncertain.To learn more about the case, please read this article from CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/11/tech/facebook-antitrust-lawsuit-what-to-know/index.html (Links to an external site.)For this writing assignment you have two choices:Choice 1: Government AttorneyYou are an attorney, either for the federal government, or for a state of your choosing. Write a letter, from your office, to Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Lay out your reasons why you believe Facebook has violated antitrust laws, why you believe they should be broken up, and how that breakup will happen.Choice 2: Facebook General CounselYou are Jennifer Newstead, VP and General Counsel for Facebook (the lead lawyer for the company). Write a reply letter to the Federal Trade Commission in which you make the case that Facebook is not a monopoly, and does not harm consumers. To be extra clear, you are writing only one letter. Make sure it looks like a formal letter. You may supply any information not provided in the case study--meaning you may make up names and addresses as needed.

ART110HMExhibition Critique Guidelines and RubricQEP AssignmentTo complete the Exhibition Critique, you will need to take a trip to a museum (either physically or virtually). After you tour the museum, consider the works on view, the organization, the curatorial concerns of exhibition, and write a critique.Your Exhibition Critique should be created keeping the following elements of thought in mind. This assignment will assess your demonstration of critical thinking and the SLU core values, specifically respect and community, within your Exhibition Critique per the guidelines discussed in previous lectures and in-class activities.The paper will be 2-4 pages in length, with at least 3 outside resources, using MLA format.The criteria for the QEP scoring rubric is below (scores will be rounded up). After writing your first draft, use this rubric as a tool to self-assess. Please be sure that your final draft reflects each of the following critical thinking standards before submitting it to the assignment folder no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT of Module 5. (This assignment folder may be linked to Turnitin.)

Answer 3 separate questions in at least 10-12 sentences for each question.Being Organized (13)1. I know a married couple who differs quite a bit in their respective levels of being "organized" or "disorganized." The husband tends to fall on the organized side (at least in some areas), whereas the wife is more on the disorganized side (at least in some areas). Their young daughters seem to be taking after their mother when it comes to their rooms and messes (maybe all kids are like this?). On occasion, I have wondered what it is that makes a person "organized." I've also wondered how a disorganized person might become better-organized.How would you explain the organized/disorganized dimension? That is, what concepts (that we've covered so far in this course) can you apply to these questions and to the married couple described above? Do any of the goal-related concepts(see Chapter 15) apply to this question?Me, myself & I (14)2.One of the questions that comes up in this section of the course is "When does a person really have a 'self'?" All things considered (developmentally speaking), when would you say that the "self" (that is, its most important aspects) is firmly established? (Give a specific age) Why would you say this? Justify and support your answer by drawing on the theories and research from this part of the course.Also, indicate how the "self" of younger and/or older persons differs from the self of your chosen age. Where/how do the various self-related traits and processes fit in with your chosen age?What have you learned about personality (15)3.In this final discussion, please answer the following questions:(a) What are your most favorite and least favorite approaches to personality? Why?(b) What do you now know about yourself and/or other people that you didn't know before?