What are some recent developments with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus as a beer hybrid?
User Generated
orrmnpyrrm
Writing
Description
What are some recent developments with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus as a beer hybrid?
Also please explain in a half page the aneuploidy (3n) respective to beer production.
3 pages. APA style. No need for introduction, just get to the points and facts. Must be referenced with no opinions.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
11 pages
Benchmark Intake Report Part One And Two
Benchmark Intake Report Part One and Two: Initial Interview Assignment Template and The interview will be conducted with a ...
Benchmark Intake Report Part One And Two
Benchmark Intake Report Part One and Two: Initial Interview Assignment Template and The interview will be conducted with a 24-year-old Latino female ...
NR451 Chamberlain Wk 2 Effective Communication in Healthcare Culture Questions
Effective communication is a staple of our healthcare culture. Working with patients, peers, and interprofessional teams ...
NR451 Chamberlain Wk 2 Effective Communication in Healthcare Culture Questions
Effective communication is a staple of our healthcare culture. Working with patients, peers, and interprofessional teams requires that nurses manage information and evidence toward influencing safe and positive patient outcomes.Please address the following:Describe caring attributes of the culture where you currently practice. Which attributes stand out as having significant influence on patients, nurses, and other healthcare professionals?How do you see effective communication relating to patient outcomes in this setting? What is the evidence for this?
DIGI 700 WGU Strategic Communication Philosophy and Technopoly Questions
Paper 3: Postman Postman, N. (1993). Technolopy: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Vintage Books/Rand ...
DIGI 700 WGU Strategic Communication Philosophy and Technopoly Questions
Paper 3: Postman Postman, N. (1993). Technolopy: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Vintage Books/Random House. ISBN: 9780679745402. Neil Postman is a self-proclaimed provocateur, yet many interpret him as a chronic pessimist because of his insightful critiques of technology’s impact of culture and life. In particular, his definition of totalitarian technocracy provides a compelling perspective on the impact of technology on everything from communication to physical problems. Postman looks deep into culture shifts and even suggest a theology of technology. Because of his critical insights and challenging spirit, he plays an important role in conversations past, present, and future. (750 words) Q1: In his own way, how does Postman understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would one talk about these transitions? Q2: What is the significance of technolopoly? How are these insights valuable to your research interest? Q3: How is Postman relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment?
UMGC Genetic Engineering of Animals Ethical Issues Including Welfare Concerns Review
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrat ...
UMGC Genetic Engineering of Animals Ethical Issues Including Welfare Concerns Review
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can't submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a SourceASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.Sample TouchstoneA. Assignment GuidelinesDIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.1. Source IdentificationThe introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:❒ Have you provided the author's name?❒ Have you provided the source title?❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?2. Source Evaluation❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's credibility?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?3. Reflection❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?B. Reflection QuestionsDIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)C. Rubric Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%)Thesis StatementProvide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, and well-supported.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is adequately supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea that is generally supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea, but it is not not well supported or does not match most of essay's content.The thesis statement is missing or completely unsupported.Evidence and AnalysisEvaluate a single source based on the characteristics of credibility and usefulness.The analysis includes specific examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed.The analysis includes examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are adequately developed.The analysis includes some examples from the text, though they potentially vague or abstract; claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development.The analysis includes one or two examples from the text, but they are of a vague, abstract nature; claims for either credibility or usefulness are missing.The analysis includes little to no examples for support; there are no established claims for either credibility or usefulness.OrganizationExhibit competent organizational writing techniques.Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an engaging introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents nearly all of the required components of a source evaluation essay; however, one component is missing.Presents most of the required components of a source evaluation essay, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay.Lacks several or all of the components of a source evaluation essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.StyleEstablish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.ConventionsFollow conventions for standard written English.There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.ReflectionAnswer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present.D. RequirementsThe following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.Use a readable 12-point font.All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.Composition must be original and written for this assignment.Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.Include all of the assignment components in a single file.Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.E. Additional ResourcesThe following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:Purdue Online Writing Lab's APA Formatting and Style GuideThis site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.Frequently Asked Questions About APA StyleThis page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The "References," "Punctuation," and "Grammar and Writing Style" sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.APA Style: Quick Answers—ReferencesThis page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.
Democratic Erosion In Australia Political Science Analysis
Time period: The case study is restricted to the years 2000-2019, so please focus your discussion of events on these years ...
Democratic Erosion In Australia Political Science Analysis
Time period: The case study is restricted to the years 2000-2019, so please focus your discussion of events on these years; though more historical events or phenomena may be briefly discussed to motivate or explain what happens later.Democratic roots (1-2 pages):How long has the country been a democracy? In the years before the country began backsliding, how would you describe the state of the democracy? You can use standard indices, e.g. Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, Polity, to establish relative measures of democracy, but also include descriptive evidence of the status of democracy in the country including the quality of elections, the extent of political freedoms, and civic openness and participation.Timeline and international context (1-2 pages):When did the country start to backslide (provide separate descriptions if there are multiple instances of backsliding)? Were there international factors during this time that contributed to the downturn? For how many years was democracy on the decline?Precursors of erosion (2 page min):Are there specific, time-limited events or precursors to democratic erosion?Are there more static features of society that contributed to democratic erosion, e.g. ethnic heterogeneity, partisan polarization, economic inequality? Are there features of local institutions that facilitated the decline, e.g. an especially strong executive branch, weak judicial legitimacy or a non-credible press? We encourage you to use the Theory Matrix in the Lust and Waldner reading (p. 48-64) as a tool to explore the factors leading to backsliding.NB: When you identify determinants of democratic erosion, pay attention to how these factors changed in advance of the democratic backsliding. In other words, if the country has always faced these problems, it is unlikely that these were the cause of sudden changes in democratic institutions.NB: Please do not simply list all the problems facing the country. Be sure here to connect the country’s problems you cite to the erosion of democracy.Symptoms of erosion (2 page min):What does backsliding look like in your country, e.g. how does democratic erosion manifest? If there are multiple periods of erosion in your country’s history, describe all of them and comment on their similarities and differences. Week 4 on the uses and abuses of democratic institutions may be particularly useful here. If you do not think your country qualifies as having experienced democratic erosion, please state that in this section and defend your reasons.Resistance to erosion or the aftermath of the decline (1 page min):Is there resistance to backsliding? If so, where does it come from in society and how successful has it been?If the country is no longer backsliding, did the democracy recover or transition to a non-democratic regime? When did this happen? Describe the recovery or transition.If the democracy is still backsliding, do you predict it will continue to get worse or will start to improve? Why?
Swimming experience , writing homework help
this is my assignment write interesting experience in your life can you write the short paragraph. please basic paragraph ...
Swimming experience , writing homework help
this is my assignment write interesting experience in your life can you write the short paragraph. please basic paragraph my experience when I learn to swim.first paragraph about: any thing relevant such as how old you were , whether you were alone or with someone , what you were doing, when 11old with father second paragraph about: what happened , how you reacted , what you did. because my sister fell in pool l want to learn third: the out come - how it ended , whether it affected you afterwards.
Similar Content
Article about social family
writing about the social family about their life research and develop the relationship between children. ...
BA606 Campbellsville Networking Social Capital & Team Performance Presentation
Review at least four (6) academically reviewed articles on the use of Networking and Social Capital to manage the external...
Grand Canyon University Legalizing Organ Trade Discussion
Read “Legalizing the Organ Trade?” by Ritter,
http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1833858,00.html
As not...
Read the article and answer the questions
...
ENGL 1301 Odessa College Visit to Another Country Essay
blackboard odessa college - Bing X
View Assessment
https://blackboard.odessa.edu/ultra/courses/_27399_1/grades/assessment/...
UCLA Overview of Main Argument in A Particular Stretch of Proposition 13 Reflection
The Perfect Intellect and Human MindsReading: Ethics Part II, through Proposition 13 and the “Physical Digression” (MP...
Budget Questions
Explain how writing a monthly budget helps you manage spending Effective spending is guided by having a monthly budget. It...
Quiz
Which of the following is not considered mass media? Which of the following is not considered a public forum? An example o...
Corporate Social Responsibility Addendum
Carnivore Corporation and PLC is a British-American operator of cruises and a massive leisure travel company that is locat...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Book Thief
by Markus Zusak
Freakonomics
by Stephen J. Dubner and Steven D. Levitt
East of Eden
by John Steinback
Hiroshima
by John Hersey
Tess of the DUrbervilles
by Thomas Hardy
Wuthering Heights
by Emily Brontë
A Wrinkle as Time
by Madeleine L'Engle
Fahrenheit 451
by Ray Bradbury
Pride and Prejudice
by Jane Austen
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
11 pages
Benchmark Intake Report Part One And Two
Benchmark Intake Report Part One and Two: Initial Interview Assignment Template and The interview will be conducted with a ...
Benchmark Intake Report Part One And Two
Benchmark Intake Report Part One and Two: Initial Interview Assignment Template and The interview will be conducted with a 24-year-old Latino female ...
NR451 Chamberlain Wk 2 Effective Communication in Healthcare Culture Questions
Effective communication is a staple of our healthcare culture. Working with patients, peers, and interprofessional teams ...
NR451 Chamberlain Wk 2 Effective Communication in Healthcare Culture Questions
Effective communication is a staple of our healthcare culture. Working with patients, peers, and interprofessional teams requires that nurses manage information and evidence toward influencing safe and positive patient outcomes.Please address the following:Describe caring attributes of the culture where you currently practice. Which attributes stand out as having significant influence on patients, nurses, and other healthcare professionals?How do you see effective communication relating to patient outcomes in this setting? What is the evidence for this?
DIGI 700 WGU Strategic Communication Philosophy and Technopoly Questions
Paper 3: Postman Postman, N. (1993). Technolopy: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Vintage Books/Rand ...
DIGI 700 WGU Strategic Communication Philosophy and Technopoly Questions
Paper 3: Postman Postman, N. (1993). Technolopy: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Vintage Books/Random House. ISBN: 9780679745402. Neil Postman is a self-proclaimed provocateur, yet many interpret him as a chronic pessimist because of his insightful critiques of technology’s impact of culture and life. In particular, his definition of totalitarian technocracy provides a compelling perspective on the impact of technology on everything from communication to physical problems. Postman looks deep into culture shifts and even suggest a theology of technology. Because of his critical insights and challenging spirit, he plays an important role in conversations past, present, and future. (750 words) Q1: In his own way, how does Postman understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would one talk about these transitions? Q2: What is the significance of technolopoly? How are these insights valuable to your research interest? Q3: How is Postman relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment?
UMGC Genetic Engineering of Animals Ethical Issues Including Welfare Concerns Review
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrat ...
UMGC Genetic Engineering of Animals Ethical Issues Including Welfare Concerns Review
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can't submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a SourceASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.Sample TouchstoneA. Assignment GuidelinesDIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.1. Source IdentificationThe introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:❒ Have you provided the author's name?❒ Have you provided the source title?❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?2. Source Evaluation❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's credibility?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?3. Reflection❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?B. Reflection QuestionsDIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)C. Rubric Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%)Thesis StatementProvide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, and well-supported.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is adequately supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea that is generally supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea, but it is not not well supported or does not match most of essay's content.The thesis statement is missing or completely unsupported.Evidence and AnalysisEvaluate a single source based on the characteristics of credibility and usefulness.The analysis includes specific examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed.The analysis includes examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are adequately developed.The analysis includes some examples from the text, though they potentially vague or abstract; claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development.The analysis includes one or two examples from the text, but they are of a vague, abstract nature; claims for either credibility or usefulness are missing.The analysis includes little to no examples for support; there are no established claims for either credibility or usefulness.OrganizationExhibit competent organizational writing techniques.Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an engaging introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source's usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents nearly all of the required components of a source evaluation essay; however, one component is missing.Presents most of the required components of a source evaluation essay, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay.Lacks several or all of the components of a source evaluation essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.StyleEstablish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.ConventionsFollow conventions for standard written English.There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.ReflectionAnswer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present.D. RequirementsThe following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.Use a readable 12-point font.All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.Composition must be original and written for this assignment.Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.Include all of the assignment components in a single file.Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.E. Additional ResourcesThe following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:Purdue Online Writing Lab's APA Formatting and Style GuideThis site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.Frequently Asked Questions About APA StyleThis page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The "References," "Punctuation," and "Grammar and Writing Style" sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.APA Style: Quick Answers—ReferencesThis page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.
Democratic Erosion In Australia Political Science Analysis
Time period: The case study is restricted to the years 2000-2019, so please focus your discussion of events on these years ...
Democratic Erosion In Australia Political Science Analysis
Time period: The case study is restricted to the years 2000-2019, so please focus your discussion of events on these years; though more historical events or phenomena may be briefly discussed to motivate or explain what happens later.Democratic roots (1-2 pages):How long has the country been a democracy? In the years before the country began backsliding, how would you describe the state of the democracy? You can use standard indices, e.g. Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, Polity, to establish relative measures of democracy, but also include descriptive evidence of the status of democracy in the country including the quality of elections, the extent of political freedoms, and civic openness and participation.Timeline and international context (1-2 pages):When did the country start to backslide (provide separate descriptions if there are multiple instances of backsliding)? Were there international factors during this time that contributed to the downturn? For how many years was democracy on the decline?Precursors of erosion (2 page min):Are there specific, time-limited events or precursors to democratic erosion?Are there more static features of society that contributed to democratic erosion, e.g. ethnic heterogeneity, partisan polarization, economic inequality? Are there features of local institutions that facilitated the decline, e.g. an especially strong executive branch, weak judicial legitimacy or a non-credible press? We encourage you to use the Theory Matrix in the Lust and Waldner reading (p. 48-64) as a tool to explore the factors leading to backsliding.NB: When you identify determinants of democratic erosion, pay attention to how these factors changed in advance of the democratic backsliding. In other words, if the country has always faced these problems, it is unlikely that these were the cause of sudden changes in democratic institutions.NB: Please do not simply list all the problems facing the country. Be sure here to connect the country’s problems you cite to the erosion of democracy.Symptoms of erosion (2 page min):What does backsliding look like in your country, e.g. how does democratic erosion manifest? If there are multiple periods of erosion in your country’s history, describe all of them and comment on their similarities and differences. Week 4 on the uses and abuses of democratic institutions may be particularly useful here. If you do not think your country qualifies as having experienced democratic erosion, please state that in this section and defend your reasons.Resistance to erosion or the aftermath of the decline (1 page min):Is there resistance to backsliding? If so, where does it come from in society and how successful has it been?If the country is no longer backsliding, did the democracy recover or transition to a non-democratic regime? When did this happen? Describe the recovery or transition.If the democracy is still backsliding, do you predict it will continue to get worse or will start to improve? Why?
Swimming experience , writing homework help
this is my assignment write interesting experience in your life can you write the short paragraph. please basic paragraph ...
Swimming experience , writing homework help
this is my assignment write interesting experience in your life can you write the short paragraph. please basic paragraph my experience when I learn to swim.first paragraph about: any thing relevant such as how old you were , whether you were alone or with someone , what you were doing, when 11old with father second paragraph about: what happened , how you reacted , what you did. because my sister fell in pool l want to learn third: the out come - how it ended , whether it affected you afterwards.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents