Here is a questionnaire for you to take on your "Influencing Style". Provide feedback on how it relates to you and your style. How might you use your style with organization management? How does your style prepare you for operations strategy?FTT-InfluencingSkillsFinder_v1.0.pdf You will be writing three or more discussion posts per week. Your main post must be two to three substantive paragraphs (250+ total words) and include at least one APA-formatted external citation/reference. Please follow up with two subsequent replies to colleagues. Each reply should consist of a relevant paragraph containing 50 words or more. Your posts should be substantive, demonstrate independent thought relevant to the topic, and encourage continued discussion. Please avoid simply repeating previous posts and agreeing. Provide supporting evidence for your ideas and opinions through the use of personal or work examples, relevant articles or websites, or concepts covered in the week’s readings. For full credit, your first post must be made by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. (MT), and you must post the remaining two before Sunday at 11:59 (ET). You are expected to participate in the ongoing discussion on at least two different days during the week.

1. We focus on the concept of the balanced scorecard. Please note what it is and how organizations use balanced scorecards. Note any alternative methods organizations use instead of the balanced scorecard and why they would use these methods over the balanced scorecard.2.Chapter 6 – study questions 1-10, Exercise 3, 6, & 7 (Information Systems for Business and Beyond) Submit the above homework in one document. The study questions and exercises can be found from the below linkhttps://opentextbook.site/informationsystems2019/chapter/chapter-6-information-systems-security-information-systems-introduction/3.Chapter 6 – Review the section on knowledge creation, culture, and strategy. Explain how balance scorecards impact knowledge creation, culture, and strategy. Why are these important concepts to understand within an organization? (Information Technology and Organizational Learning).Try to write from the textbook I shared for questions 1 and 3. Follow APA standards for all the questionsCheck for plagiarism.

Determine and interpret the linear correlation coefficient, and use linear regression to find a best fit line for a scatter plot of the data and make predictions. Scenario According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the probability of a magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake in the Greater Bay Area is 63%, about 2 out of 3, in the next 30 years. In April 2008, scientists and engineers released a new earthquake forecast for the State of California called the Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF). As a junior analyst at the USGS, you are tasked to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the magnitudes and depths from the earthquakes. Your deliverables will be a PowerPoint presentation you will create summarizing your findings and an excel document to show your work. Concepts Being Studied Correlation and regression Creating scatterplots Constructing and interpreting a Hypothesis Test for Correlation using r as the test statistic You are given a spreadsheet that contains the following information: Magnitude measured on the Richter scale Depth in km Using the spreadsheet, you will answer the problems below in a PowerPoint presentation. What to Submit The PowerPoint presentation should answer and explain the following questions based on the spreadsheet provided above. Slide 1: Title slide Slide 2: Introduce your scenario and data set including the variables provided. Slide 3: Construct a scatterplot of the two variables provided in the spreadsheet. Include a description of what you see in the scatterplot. Slide 4: Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r and the critical value of r using ? = 0.05. Include an explanation on how you found those values. Slide 5: Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the magnitudes and the depths from the earthquakes. Explain. Slide 6: Find the regression equation. Let the predictor (x) variable be the magnitude. Identify the slope and the y-intercept within your regression equation. Slide 7: Is the equation a good model? Explain. What would be the best predicted depth of an earthquake with a magnitude of 2.0? Include the correct units. Slide 8: Conclude by recapping your ideas by summarizing the information presented in context of the scenario.