These are two separate questions that should be answered separately with a minimum of 200 words and include an in text cite. 1)Discuss the inherent issues associated with the impact of divorce on a member of the "Sandwich Generation" who is currently dealing with aging parents in failing health (it can be a male or female member). Postulate the relationships that would necessarily change and the implications for working with the family as client that the MFT would need to consider.2)Consider a scenario in which a member of the sandwich generation (can be male or female) is at the center of family controversy in which they are considering making a major life change (it could be changing careers, returning to school, buying a new home, etc.). Consider ways in which the life change you select may impact the recent relocation of an elderly parent to the home of the adult child. Postulate the impact of the change on various members of the household (you can select the family size/configuration).Reading to answer the questions correctlyBarron, B. (2017, December 12). 9 Tips for Managing Sandwich Generation Stress. Retrieved February 08, 2018, from https://www.care.com/c/stories/5326/9-tips-for-managing-sandwich-generation-stress/Larsen, D. (2016, February 26). What is the Sandwich Generation? Retrieved February 08, 2018, from https://www.aplaceformom.com/blog/10-05-15-what-is-the-sandwich-generation/Tarantine, R. (2014, September 07). The Sandwich Generation: Who is Caring for You? Retrieved February 08, 2018, from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/ruth-tarantine-dnp-rn/baby-boomers-caregivers_b_5733782.html

The main research question is: How do social media affect the academic performance`?TOTAL 4 SOURCES. (2 for Part.1 and 2 for Part.2)Part. 1 DirectionsFor TWO of the sources you find for your essay, complete the source evaluation, described below. Please offer a few sentences for each evaluation section. Single-sentence responses will not earn full credit.Required Content (Again, do not respond with one- or two-word sentences.)Say how you found it. What search engine or database did you use? What search phrases? Did you have to try out a few different phrases before you found the right ones?Describe the sourceBriefly summarize the source’s main point or argument. This should capture the argument, not just describe the topic. What type of source is this (ex: report, study, policy analysis, newspaper opinion-editorial or analysis, blog, etc.)? Where was this piece published? (Think tank, news media, academic study, etc.)?Is there an ideological bias in the publisher? Look at the "mission" or "about us" page. Then look up the source on https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ (Links to an external site.) Why does this matter?Offer an assessment:Write a brief paragraph explaining why you think the source is or is not well informed, well-reasoned, and accurate. Consider (but don't answer individually) the following questions: Where did the author get their information? Are their sources of information credible or not? How do you know? Is the writer’s reasoning clear? Offer at least ONE example of the reasoning and evidence, and discuss how/why you find it to be credible and convincing. Write a brief paragraph explaining why you think the author(s) is or is not credible. Who is the author/who wrote this? What do you know about their background and expertise? What makes them qualified or unqualified to write about the topic? How do you know/how did you find out? GOOGLE the author. Offer a reflection: How useful the source is to you and how will you use it? What might someone else reading this article get out of it, or how would that person find it useful? Would you use this source for your project? Why or why not? If you will use it, say how. Be specific here. Offer an evaluation of the source’s1. Logos: Are evidence and reasoning logical and credible? 2. Ethos: Is the author and is the source credible? Why? 3. Pathos: Is there an attempt to manipulate emotions?Part.2 You will present two pieces of research; one should be your best piece so far and the other your worst piece that you decided not to use. The basis of your evaluation should not be the extent to which you agree with the source.The presentation requires that you discuss:How you found each piece, including any problems you faced researching and how you surmounted those problems.Summary: What are the main arguments? What is the point of the piece? How does it support its claims?Assessment: What makes the best piece the most effective one? What makes the piece you rejected the worst piece?Reflection: Include in this discussion your reasoning for each piece's being the best or worst of what you have found so far and why. How does the best piece fit into your work (the topic, the debate, and your essay). Why will the best piece work better for you? Why would the worst piece not help your work?What lessons do you draw from the process you used to find and evaluate your best and weakest sources?

Prior to beginning work on this Journal element, please select a professional position within a criminal justice agency/organization or a juvenile justice agency/organization. Then, locate an agency/organization that employs individuals within that position. For this journal entry, you will briefly explore (in one to two pages) a professional position within a criminal justice agency/organization or a juvenile justice agency/organization in terms of duties and responsibilities. As noted below, you will need to gather information from the agency/organization that you select in order to address the below elements. You will then need to address the following: Describe how employment criteria relates to individual tasks and to agency/organizational processes relevant to this position in approximately two paragraphs. For tasks, consider duties related to the professional position, and for processes, consider agency activities, purposes, or objectives. Describe how technology relates to at least one individual task and to at least one agency/organizational process relevant to this position in approximately one paragraph. Discuss a perspective on how this position may contribute to criminal justice objectives and your own professional goals in approximately one paragraph. To complete the above elements, you will need to collect information. You may choose to collect your information through one or more of the following pathways: Communicate with a person in the Human Resources department of the agency or organization. Communicate with a professional who holds the position. Research and collect the information from an agency or organizational website. Submit your journal through Waypoint.Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.