In this Case Study, imagine you can interview the forensic scientist who studied the blood evidence. Write the questions and answers from the interview. Be sure your questions demonstrate what you have learned about blood and blood-spatter evidence. Please use the reading to help you with this question and have some of your insights as well in your answer. NO OUTSIDE RESOURCES SHOULD BE USED FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. Read pages 195-231. https://intervisualtechnology.us/uploads/PDFs/Fore... Graham Backhouse (1985) Graham Backhouse was accused of killing his neighbor and attempting to kill his wife to collect his wife’s life insurance. Backhouse’s wife had been injured in an explosion of a homemade car bomb. Backhouse claimed his neighbor had a grudge against him, and the bomb was really intended for him. When police arrived at the Backhouse home, the neighbor, Colyn Bedale-Taylor, was found dead from shotgun wounds. Backhouse had sustained wounds to his chest and face. He claimed self-defense. The blood-spatter evidence contradicted Backhouse’s statement. The blood spots on the kitchen floor were those made by dripping blood, circular in appearance and not what would have been produced by a violent encounter as Backhouse related. His wounds appeared to be self-inflicted. Chairs and furniture had been overturned on top of the blood spots, indicating a staged crime scene. Backhouse was convicted of the murder of his neighbor and the attempted murder of his wife.

Using this article related to leading by example, give a response to each of these statements:Summarize the importance of leading by example as supported by the author.Name two ways the article supported this concept. Describe two positive outcomes of this approach according to the article.Your paper should be 2-3 pages long, plus a title page and reference page. Follow APA format. Include two outside academic sources to support your responses.

It is common knowledge that two controversial issues in the American legal system are the types of criminal defenses and the manner of criminal punishment. In this assignment, you will explore both in their various forms.Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research the types of criminal defenses and the manner of criminal punishment.Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:Specify the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force. Next, identify and then discuss the relevance of the factors a court or a jury will consider in determining what force is reasonable in self-defense.Argue for or against the use of the Castle Doctrine or stand your ground laws as a defense to prevent the rendering of a guilty verdict in a criminal homicide case. Provide a rationale to support your response.Compare and contrast the defenses of diplomatic, legislative, and witness immunity. Analyze the overall role that the defenses play within the criminal justice system. Next, evaluate the general level of fairness of witness immunity to the defense. Provide a rationale to support your response.Specify the two elements of the defense of entrapment. Next, support or critique the value of the defense within the criminal law system in the United States. Justify your response.Argue for or against the "Three Strikes"laws. Provide a rationale to support your response.Use at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar types of websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Describe the nature and history of American criminal law.Explain the role of individuals and federal, state, and local government agencies in crime fighting and prosecution of criminal offenses.Analyze the essential legal elements of criminal conduct.Contrast crimes against persons, crimes against property, and other types of criminal conduct.Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal law.Write clearly and concisely about criminal law using proper writing mechanics.