Respond by Day 5 to two colleagues and explain in what ways you agree or disagree with the permissibility of the identified scenarios. Justify your reaction. $5 PostBarbara Geddes article "How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answer You Get: Selection Bias Comparative Politics" is on point about biases on the dependent variable conclusions. "The problem with selecting cases for study on the dependent variable sterns from the logic of explanation" (Geddes, 1990, p. 132). In addition, the researchers observations on different ethnicities on the dependent variable and independent variable because of their personal views (Geddes, 1990). Geddes (1990) explained that the dependent variable selection is often considered because the relationships does not exist within this research. Indeed, the dependent variables does not tied into the real world life due to the researchers bias on dependent variable (Geddes, 1990). Unfortunately, the researcher used the ethnicities as the dependent variable because of the "growing" countries rates and etc (Geddes, 1990). The biggest mistake that the research has done jumping into conclusions way too soon because that causes the research to go wrong based on the bias. In addition, the correlation in the research causes the relationship between dependent variable to have connection within the research. One scenario may be okay to choose appropriate cases base on dependent variables to conduct the research correctly accordingly. When conducting the dependent variable to its evidence like most people in the countries are currently suffering from economic crisis during the Coronavirus also known as (COVID-19). This would be easy for the researcher to this scenario as their variables to conduct their research correctly and accordingly. Reference Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2(1), 131–150. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.372.5896&rep=rep1&type=pdf

ACC/543: Managerial Accounting & Legal Aspects Of BusinessWk 1 - Apply: Business Applications CaseAssignment ContentManagerial accounting can be a complex job. As you learned in this week’s practice assignment, many different calculations need to be completed to assist an organization with its financial statements.Write a 250-word response reflecting on your experience making the calculations from the practice assignment. In your reflection, share your thoughts on the activities within this week’s readings. Consider how calculating financial statements will help drive effective business decisions.Address the following questions within your response:Which calculations were challenging for you? Why?Which ratios were difficult to understand?What will you do differently in the following weeks?If you did not have any challenges, respond to the following questions:What prepared you for these calculations?What advice would you give a classmate who needs assistance?

Module 5 DiscussionNo unread replies.No replies.Case Study: Alterations of the Renal and Urologic Function Mr. J.R. is a 73-year-old man, who was admitted to the hospital with clinical manifestations of gastroenteritis and possible renal failure. The patient’s chief complaints are fever, nausea with vomiting and diarrhea for 48 hours, weakness, dizziness, and a bothersome metallic taste in the mouth. The patient is pale and sweaty. He had been well until two days ago, when he began to experience severe nausea several hours after eating two burritos for supper. The burritos had been ordered from a local fast-food restaurant. The nausea persisted and he vomited twice with some relief. As the evening progressed, he continued to feel “very bad” and took some Pepto-Bismol to help settle his stomach. Soon thereafter, he began to feel achy and warm. His temperature at the time was 100. 5°F. He has continued to experience nausea, vomiting, and a fever. He has not been able to tolerate any solid foods or liquids. Since yesterday, he has had 5–6 watery bowel movements. He has not noticed any blood in the stools. His wife brought him to the ER because he was becoming weak and dizzy when he tried to stand up. His wife denies any recent travel, use of antibiotics, laxatives, or excessive caffeine, or that her husband has an eating disorder. Case Study QuestionsBased on the information provided above, which two types of acute renal failure are most likely.List four major risk factors that are likely to be contributing to the patient’s kidney failure.If acute renal failure progresses to chronic renal failure, hemoglobin and hematocrit may decrease significantly and a peripheral blood smear may indicate a normocytic, normochromic anemia. Suggest two pathophysiologic mechanisms that explain the abnormal hemoglobin level, hematocrit, and peripheral blood smear.Which laboratory data suggest that the infection is probably viral and not bacterial?Why is it appropriate that a serum creatinine phosphokinase assay was not ordered?Submission Instructions:Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Grading Rubric Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Discussion RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts5 pointsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.4 pointsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.2 pointsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.1 pointsPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.5 pointsUse of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines3 pointsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.2 pointsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.1 pointFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.0 pointPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.3 pointsResponse to Posts of Peers2 pointsDistinguishedStudent constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.1 pointsFairStudent constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.0 pointPoorStudent provided no response to a peer's post.