anthropology chapter 10 questions -2
User Generated
znttvrznttvr
Writing
Description
Total Word count: 800
Answer all these three questions
- Why is archaeology unique among the human sciences?
- What are the key differences between processual and postprocessual archaeology?
- What is Marxist archaeology and how is it different from the New Archaeology?
reading:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EAzkRe1q75NEtYP5c...Please download this file, all the information can get from this website.
These questions are on book page 296, need to use chapter 10 materials to answer these questions.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
piolet testing, two part discussion 350 word minimum for each section.
Error Variance [1 of 2]
Sources of error have been known to affect a test's reliability and precision. Identify the four s ...
piolet testing, two part discussion 350 word minimum for each section.
Error Variance [1 of 2]
Sources of error have been known to affect a test's reliability and precision. Identify the four sources of test error and six factors related to these sources of error that are particularly important to consider. Develop your own examples for each of these.
Pilot Testing [2 of 2]
Explain the importance of conducting a pilot test. Make a list of problems that could arise if a clinical practitioner, a human resources department, or a college (choose one) used a new test without carrying out a pilot test or validity study.
DeVry University Accounting Law and Corporate Crime Discussion
The federal government plays a critical role in regulating corporate behavior. The government tries to regulate corporate ...
DeVry University Accounting Law and Corporate Crime Discussion
The federal government plays a critical role in regulating corporate behavior. The government tries to regulate corporate behavior through a combination of guidelines and laws, as well as through establishment of agencies in which to govern and enforce those standards. Please click on the link below to read about one reporter's view from a recent Washington Post article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/11/AR2009021103674.html?hpid=moreheadlines (Links to an external site.) Now post your personal insights on one of these topics. 1) What are some of the principal factors that have inhibited local prosecutors from pursuing white collar crime cases? When they do pursue such cases, which factors seem to persuade them to do so? In what ways does white collar crime defense work differ from conventional crime defense work? 2) When O. J. Simpson was tried for the murder of his wife, Nicole Simpson, he was ruled not guilty in the criminal court hearings. However, when Nicole Simpson's family sued Simpson civilly, he was ordered to compensate Nicole's family several millions of dollars. How could that be? 3) John was recently convicted by a jury of committing fraud against his employer. After the trial, it was revealed that some key evidence against John used in trial was obtained through his employer's records and John's workstation computer. Before searching John's computer, the investigators did not have any evidence or idea that John was involved in the fraud. In fact, they stumbled on the fraud by accident. John is convinced that he has grounds for appeal. He believes the evidence found on his work computer is inadmissible because the investigators did not have probable cause to search his computer. Is John right that he could appeal the guilty verdict? Were his rights violated? 4) The FBI is on the trail of a drug supplier in Pineville, USA. The Feds believe that the supplier works at OHS Manufacturing, the employer of 75 percent of Pineville's citizens. The FBI asks OHS Manufacturing to assist in the investigation of one of its employees. Specifically, the FBI asks one of OHS's managers to search the employee's locker and give the FBI any illegal drugs found. OHS does not have a written policy allowing these searches or a history of performing these searches. Do you believe this action could be a possible violation of the Fourth Amendment? Why or why not? 5) It is usually the case that depositions for expert witnesses are much more difficult than the actual trial. Why do you think this is the case? 6) Mr. Bill is the sole proprietor of a small play-dough production company. Over the last few months, he noticed revenues dropping and started wondering what is going on. After giving it much thought, he realizes that his accountant, Mr. Pringles, has been cooking the books and stealing money from him—at least that seems to be the case. Mr. Bill is pretty upset and immediately runs down to the local courthouse and files a complaint against his accountant. Too anxious to wait for the legal process to continue, Mr. Bill decides to go to his accountant's personal residence and search for evidence of fraud. To his delight, he finds some papers that document his accountant's illegal activities. Mr. Bill hurries to the office, where he confronts his accountant and shows him all of the papers he found at his house, informing him that a complaint has been filed. Mr. Pringles, calmly laughs and walks away, apparently not affected at all by what Mr. Bill has told him. Explain why Mr. Pringles is not worried in the least about Mr. Bill's discovery.
UMB Film Dracula 1992 Directed by Francis Ford Coppola Essay
General InstructionsFor each of the two papers, you will be responsible for watching a film, writing a 3 to 5 page essay i ...
UMB Film Dracula 1992 Directed by Francis Ford Coppola Essay
General InstructionsFor each of the two papers, you will be responsible for watching a film, writing a 3 to 5 page essay in which you respond to prompts (see below), and then providing a list of “My Criteria for Quality in Film.”THE PROCESS:Make any and all arrangements necessary to view the films and write about them: Some of the films may be available for streaming via Netflix or another online content provider; others may be available for checkout from your local public library, while others may need to be rented. You are better off watching these films on the largest possible screen, and at the highest possible resolution.Make Time to Complete the Assignment: Each paper requires you to watch a film IN ADDITION to the ones you will be watching for the week’s discussion, so be sure to leave yourself enough time to: watch the film, think, write a first draft, edit and revise.Turn your assignments in by their respective due dates to the correct assignment folder in LEO.THE CONTENT:These assignments are reaction papers, not plot summaries or research papers. Write what you have to say about the film, not what others have said, but know how the film was made The papers will be graded based on:a) Evidence that you are reading and viewing the course content, comparisons to other relevant films you have seen (in class and as a movie watcher); use of the film vocabulary introduced in class and college-level writing skills (spelling, punctuation, and grammar).b) Clear presentation of your opinions and reasonable explanations and justifications to support those opinions: In a 100-level course, you would perhaps be asked to write about what you watched on the screen. In a 200-level course, you are being asked to say what you think about what you watched. In this 300-level course, you should explain why you think the way you do about the film, and then justify your opinions with explanations (using references found in the weekly content in the LEO classroom).Be sure to correctly spell the names listed in the credits of directors, actors, screenwriters, and other people (to avoid "points" being taken off of the final grade for that paper).These papers are about your observations, insights and evaluations not only what you can learn by reading up on the film or the filmmaker. Do not just repeat what you find online. Think carefully before you write, be creative and apply what you have been learning in this course.First Paper Assignment: Film One (F1)Part 1: View a feature film made between 1940 - 1970 you have not seen before (or will see later in this class) by a great director. Many directors were active both before and after 1970 so make sure you see a pre-1970 FEATURE fiction film.Suggestion: American directors such as Frank Capra, George Cukor, John Ford, George Stevens, Preston Sturges, Billy Wilder, or William Wyler. Foreign directors such as Ingmar Bergman (Swedish), Luis Buñuel (Spanish), Claude Chabrol (French), Federico Fellini (Italian), Akira Kurosawa (Japanese), Lina Wertmuller (German) or the British team known as “The Archers” made up of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger. For other possibilities, try: http://www.filmsite.org/directors.html Comment on the specific film you saw in terms of its genre and the quality of the film itself. Pay attention to the camerawork (cinematography) the editing (montage) and the sound (including music). What did you like and what did you dislike? Why do you like the things you like, and why do you dislike the things you dislike? Finally, is the film successful in creating a work of fiction using the craft of filmmaking and considering when it was made? (Note: This is not the same question as whether or not you liked it. It is entirely possible to like a film that you are aware is not very good.)Part 2: Draw some general conclusions about the work of the director and one of the main actors or actresses. For example let us say you watched the 1962 film Lawrence of Arabia. Did you like David Lean as a filmmaker? Explain your answer. Did you like Peter O’Toole in the role of Larwrence? Why, or why not?End with your overall impression of the film, including how you see it as an example of the its genre and time period. PARTS ONE AND TWO SHOULD BE PRESENTED AS A SINGLE ESSAY!Part 3: On a separate page, insert the heading "My Criteria for Quality in Film." Under that heading, propose four general statements indicative of your personal taste in movies. These statements should be numbered (1) through (4), and they should be written as complete sentences or a short paragraph. For example, if you commented in your essay that you liked the acting because it was realistic and you liked the script because it had a happy ending, you could propose these two statements as criteria for quality: "(1) Excellent movies feature realistic acting. (2) A movie is more likely to be good if it ends happily." Think about and then explain what words such as good, excellent, and effective actually mean. Be sure to save your "My Criteria" page to your hard drive—you will be resubmitting an expanded version of it with for the second paper later in this course.Second Paper Assignment: Film TwoThis is essentially the same assignment as Paper One BUT about a film produced between 1970 and 2000.Part 1: View a feature film made between 1970 – 2000 you have not seen before (or will see later in this class) by a great director or featuring a great actor or actress. Just as you did in the first paper, comment on the specific film you saw. Pay particular attention to the screenplay, camerawork (cinematography) the editing (montage) and the sound (including music). for this paper, also address special effects. Again, as you did in the first paper, talk about what you like and what you dislike? Why do you like the things you like, and why do you dislike the things you dislike? Is the film a good film, or is it not?Part 2: Now that you have commented on the specific film you viewed, see if you can draw some general conclusions about the work of the director and one of the main actors or actresses. Be sure to comment on the overall impression you had of the film, including how you see it as an example of the its genre and time period. Remember, this is film review based on your opinions and insights: do not repeat what you have learned by reading up on the film or the filmmaker.Part 3: Go back to the "My Criteria for Quality in Film" page. Based on your viewing of this week's film, add four new general conclusions. These statements should be numbered (5) through (8). Be sure to include all of the criteria you created for Paper One.
NRS 429VN Cultural competence in nursing practice Discussion
QUESTION 1.What are the methods a nurse can use to
gather cultural information from patients? How does cultural competenc ...
NRS 429VN Cultural competence in nursing practice Discussion
QUESTION 1.What are the methods a nurse can use to
gather cultural information from patients? How does cultural competence relate
to better patient care? Discuss the ways in which a nurse demonstrates cultural
competency in nursing practice.QUESTION2. Discuss why nutrition is a central
component in health promotion. What are some of the nutritional challenges for
emerging populations? What roles do nutritional deficiency and nutritional
excess play in disease.
Understanding Logic and Recognizing Common Fallacies
In a fully developed short essay (minimum of eight paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below and pos ...
Understanding Logic and Recognizing Common Fallacies
In a fully developed short essay (minimum of eight paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below and post your essay to the discussion forum. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion.Remember that you are having a conversation with your peers in this particular genre of writing, so adopt an appropriate tone and vocabulary for an audience of contemporary college students. Please take some time to edit your work for punctuation, usage, and clarity prior to submission, and don’t forget to comment on the works of two peers in order to earn full credit for these discussions.Questions for Analysis:1) What role should logic play in modern argument? Which approach to reasoning do you think will be most useful for you in the research argument that you are developing in this course?2) Using at least three of the common fallacies listed in this learning module, explain which errors in logic you see most frequently in your daily experience with the news, politics, and advertising. Please link to a news story, advertisement, or opinion piece in supporting your view (you should have at least three hyperlinks for this discussion, although you don’t need to include a “Works Cited” list as part of your discussion post).3) In reflecting on Jones’s essay, how can we, as participants in American culture, foster a healthier environment for productive debate? Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the future of finding common ground in these important public discussions? Explain your views on finding common ground in the arguments that we engage with as participants in a complex and diverse culture.Attached you will find a copy of Rebecca Jones' essay.
Similar Content
Saint Leo University Top Five Essentials of Leadership Communication Response
respond to their persons discussion At least a 100 words My top five essentials of leadership communication are:1) Be awar...
Need help to write a Research Argument Rough Draft. Choose your own topic
Researched Argument Rough DraftYour researched argument is meant to stand as a culmination of all the work you have done t...
The Five Pillars of Islamic Religion Essay
discuss the five pillars of Islamic religion and their relevance in contemporary Islamic societies. ...
ENG 1100c Kean University Own Responsibility by Eleanor Roosevelt Essay
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fQ0yMrdnEBOGSrfI... ...
1200-1500 words essay about greek mythology
The instructions in the attachments.Please follow the instructions carefully.Thank yo ...
Research Essay from attached bibliography.
Task: Write an essay using evidence to support a thesis that addresses your research question examining a current is...
Task 2 Marketing
Samsung is one of the leaders in the technology and innovative world, and the constant growth of the company has led to fo...
Using An Olap Tool
The trend I observed in the employment data (Year-to-Year) is that the number of employees I anticipate that there will be...
Discussion Board2
...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
piolet testing, two part discussion 350 word minimum for each section.
Error Variance [1 of 2]
Sources of error have been known to affect a test's reliability and precision. Identify the four s ...
piolet testing, two part discussion 350 word minimum for each section.
Error Variance [1 of 2]
Sources of error have been known to affect a test's reliability and precision. Identify the four sources of test error and six factors related to these sources of error that are particularly important to consider. Develop your own examples for each of these.
Pilot Testing [2 of 2]
Explain the importance of conducting a pilot test. Make a list of problems that could arise if a clinical practitioner, a human resources department, or a college (choose one) used a new test without carrying out a pilot test or validity study.
DeVry University Accounting Law and Corporate Crime Discussion
The federal government plays a critical role in regulating corporate behavior. The government tries to regulate corporate ...
DeVry University Accounting Law and Corporate Crime Discussion
The federal government plays a critical role in regulating corporate behavior. The government tries to regulate corporate behavior through a combination of guidelines and laws, as well as through establishment of agencies in which to govern and enforce those standards. Please click on the link below to read about one reporter's view from a recent Washington Post article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/11/AR2009021103674.html?hpid=moreheadlines (Links to an external site.) Now post your personal insights on one of these topics. 1) What are some of the principal factors that have inhibited local prosecutors from pursuing white collar crime cases? When they do pursue such cases, which factors seem to persuade them to do so? In what ways does white collar crime defense work differ from conventional crime defense work? 2) When O. J. Simpson was tried for the murder of his wife, Nicole Simpson, he was ruled not guilty in the criminal court hearings. However, when Nicole Simpson's family sued Simpson civilly, he was ordered to compensate Nicole's family several millions of dollars. How could that be? 3) John was recently convicted by a jury of committing fraud against his employer. After the trial, it was revealed that some key evidence against John used in trial was obtained through his employer's records and John's workstation computer. Before searching John's computer, the investigators did not have any evidence or idea that John was involved in the fraud. In fact, they stumbled on the fraud by accident. John is convinced that he has grounds for appeal. He believes the evidence found on his work computer is inadmissible because the investigators did not have probable cause to search his computer. Is John right that he could appeal the guilty verdict? Were his rights violated? 4) The FBI is on the trail of a drug supplier in Pineville, USA. The Feds believe that the supplier works at OHS Manufacturing, the employer of 75 percent of Pineville's citizens. The FBI asks OHS Manufacturing to assist in the investigation of one of its employees. Specifically, the FBI asks one of OHS's managers to search the employee's locker and give the FBI any illegal drugs found. OHS does not have a written policy allowing these searches or a history of performing these searches. Do you believe this action could be a possible violation of the Fourth Amendment? Why or why not? 5) It is usually the case that depositions for expert witnesses are much more difficult than the actual trial. Why do you think this is the case? 6) Mr. Bill is the sole proprietor of a small play-dough production company. Over the last few months, he noticed revenues dropping and started wondering what is going on. After giving it much thought, he realizes that his accountant, Mr. Pringles, has been cooking the books and stealing money from him—at least that seems to be the case. Mr. Bill is pretty upset and immediately runs down to the local courthouse and files a complaint against his accountant. Too anxious to wait for the legal process to continue, Mr. Bill decides to go to his accountant's personal residence and search for evidence of fraud. To his delight, he finds some papers that document his accountant's illegal activities. Mr. Bill hurries to the office, where he confronts his accountant and shows him all of the papers he found at his house, informing him that a complaint has been filed. Mr. Pringles, calmly laughs and walks away, apparently not affected at all by what Mr. Bill has told him. Explain why Mr. Pringles is not worried in the least about Mr. Bill's discovery.
UMB Film Dracula 1992 Directed by Francis Ford Coppola Essay
General InstructionsFor each of the two papers, you will be responsible for watching a film, writing a 3 to 5 page essay i ...
UMB Film Dracula 1992 Directed by Francis Ford Coppola Essay
General InstructionsFor each of the two papers, you will be responsible for watching a film, writing a 3 to 5 page essay in which you respond to prompts (see below), and then providing a list of “My Criteria for Quality in Film.”THE PROCESS:Make any and all arrangements necessary to view the films and write about them: Some of the films may be available for streaming via Netflix or another online content provider; others may be available for checkout from your local public library, while others may need to be rented. You are better off watching these films on the largest possible screen, and at the highest possible resolution.Make Time to Complete the Assignment: Each paper requires you to watch a film IN ADDITION to the ones you will be watching for the week’s discussion, so be sure to leave yourself enough time to: watch the film, think, write a first draft, edit and revise.Turn your assignments in by their respective due dates to the correct assignment folder in LEO.THE CONTENT:These assignments are reaction papers, not plot summaries or research papers. Write what you have to say about the film, not what others have said, but know how the film was made The papers will be graded based on:a) Evidence that you are reading and viewing the course content, comparisons to other relevant films you have seen (in class and as a movie watcher); use of the film vocabulary introduced in class and college-level writing skills (spelling, punctuation, and grammar).b) Clear presentation of your opinions and reasonable explanations and justifications to support those opinions: In a 100-level course, you would perhaps be asked to write about what you watched on the screen. In a 200-level course, you are being asked to say what you think about what you watched. In this 300-level course, you should explain why you think the way you do about the film, and then justify your opinions with explanations (using references found in the weekly content in the LEO classroom).Be sure to correctly spell the names listed in the credits of directors, actors, screenwriters, and other people (to avoid "points" being taken off of the final grade for that paper).These papers are about your observations, insights and evaluations not only what you can learn by reading up on the film or the filmmaker. Do not just repeat what you find online. Think carefully before you write, be creative and apply what you have been learning in this course.First Paper Assignment: Film One (F1)Part 1: View a feature film made between 1940 - 1970 you have not seen before (or will see later in this class) by a great director. Many directors were active both before and after 1970 so make sure you see a pre-1970 FEATURE fiction film.Suggestion: American directors such as Frank Capra, George Cukor, John Ford, George Stevens, Preston Sturges, Billy Wilder, or William Wyler. Foreign directors such as Ingmar Bergman (Swedish), Luis Buñuel (Spanish), Claude Chabrol (French), Federico Fellini (Italian), Akira Kurosawa (Japanese), Lina Wertmuller (German) or the British team known as “The Archers” made up of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger. For other possibilities, try: http://www.filmsite.org/directors.html Comment on the specific film you saw in terms of its genre and the quality of the film itself. Pay attention to the camerawork (cinematography) the editing (montage) and the sound (including music). What did you like and what did you dislike? Why do you like the things you like, and why do you dislike the things you dislike? Finally, is the film successful in creating a work of fiction using the craft of filmmaking and considering when it was made? (Note: This is not the same question as whether or not you liked it. It is entirely possible to like a film that you are aware is not very good.)Part 2: Draw some general conclusions about the work of the director and one of the main actors or actresses. For example let us say you watched the 1962 film Lawrence of Arabia. Did you like David Lean as a filmmaker? Explain your answer. Did you like Peter O’Toole in the role of Larwrence? Why, or why not?End with your overall impression of the film, including how you see it as an example of the its genre and time period. PARTS ONE AND TWO SHOULD BE PRESENTED AS A SINGLE ESSAY!Part 3: On a separate page, insert the heading "My Criteria for Quality in Film." Under that heading, propose four general statements indicative of your personal taste in movies. These statements should be numbered (1) through (4), and they should be written as complete sentences or a short paragraph. For example, if you commented in your essay that you liked the acting because it was realistic and you liked the script because it had a happy ending, you could propose these two statements as criteria for quality: "(1) Excellent movies feature realistic acting. (2) A movie is more likely to be good if it ends happily." Think about and then explain what words such as good, excellent, and effective actually mean. Be sure to save your "My Criteria" page to your hard drive—you will be resubmitting an expanded version of it with for the second paper later in this course.Second Paper Assignment: Film TwoThis is essentially the same assignment as Paper One BUT about a film produced between 1970 and 2000.Part 1: View a feature film made between 1970 – 2000 you have not seen before (or will see later in this class) by a great director or featuring a great actor or actress. Just as you did in the first paper, comment on the specific film you saw. Pay particular attention to the screenplay, camerawork (cinematography) the editing (montage) and the sound (including music). for this paper, also address special effects. Again, as you did in the first paper, talk about what you like and what you dislike? Why do you like the things you like, and why do you dislike the things you dislike? Is the film a good film, or is it not?Part 2: Now that you have commented on the specific film you viewed, see if you can draw some general conclusions about the work of the director and one of the main actors or actresses. Be sure to comment on the overall impression you had of the film, including how you see it as an example of the its genre and time period. Remember, this is film review based on your opinions and insights: do not repeat what you have learned by reading up on the film or the filmmaker.Part 3: Go back to the "My Criteria for Quality in Film" page. Based on your viewing of this week's film, add four new general conclusions. These statements should be numbered (5) through (8). Be sure to include all of the criteria you created for Paper One.
NRS 429VN Cultural competence in nursing practice Discussion
QUESTION 1.What are the methods a nurse can use to
gather cultural information from patients? How does cultural competenc ...
NRS 429VN Cultural competence in nursing practice Discussion
QUESTION 1.What are the methods a nurse can use to
gather cultural information from patients? How does cultural competence relate
to better patient care? Discuss the ways in which a nurse demonstrates cultural
competency in nursing practice.QUESTION2. Discuss why nutrition is a central
component in health promotion. What are some of the nutritional challenges for
emerging populations? What roles do nutritional deficiency and nutritional
excess play in disease.
Understanding Logic and Recognizing Common Fallacies
In a fully developed short essay (minimum of eight paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below and pos ...
Understanding Logic and Recognizing Common Fallacies
In a fully developed short essay (minimum of eight paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below and post your essay to the discussion forum. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion.Remember that you are having a conversation with your peers in this particular genre of writing, so adopt an appropriate tone and vocabulary for an audience of contemporary college students. Please take some time to edit your work for punctuation, usage, and clarity prior to submission, and don’t forget to comment on the works of two peers in order to earn full credit for these discussions.Questions for Analysis:1) What role should logic play in modern argument? Which approach to reasoning do you think will be most useful for you in the research argument that you are developing in this course?2) Using at least three of the common fallacies listed in this learning module, explain which errors in logic you see most frequently in your daily experience with the news, politics, and advertising. Please link to a news story, advertisement, or opinion piece in supporting your view (you should have at least three hyperlinks for this discussion, although you don’t need to include a “Works Cited” list as part of your discussion post).3) In reflecting on Jones’s essay, how can we, as participants in American culture, foster a healthier environment for productive debate? Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the future of finding common ground in these important public discussions? Explain your views on finding common ground in the arguments that we engage with as participants in a complex and diverse culture.Attached you will find a copy of Rebecca Jones' essay.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents