Description
In no less than 100 words compose your answer on a word document and submit it digital dropbox.
Discuss the purpose of the preacher's maxim.
Please do not plagiarism and use your own words also if you taking any thing from any websites put it
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Running head/preacher’s maxim
1
PREACHER’S MAXIM
NAME
INSTITUTION
DATE
Running head/preacher’s maxim
2
When we refer to preacher’s maxim, then we simply refer to one of the most effective and the
best formulas which a person can follow ...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Just what I needed. Studypool is a lifesaver!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Univerisity of The Cumberlands Testing Maintenance and Auditing Process Questions
1. Describe TQM, Six Sigma and CMM (CMMI).
2. What is a Structured Walk-thru?
3. What are Service-Oriented Architectures?
...
Univerisity of The Cumberlands Testing Maintenance and Auditing Process Questions
1. Describe TQM, Six Sigma and CMM (CMMI).
2. What is a Structured Walk-thru?
3. What are Service-Oriented Architectures?
4. Describe the use of Documentation and Procedure Manuals.
5. Describe the Testing, Maintenance and Auditing process.
6. Describe how Systems are Distributed.
7. Describe how Training is conducted during Implementation.
8. Describe System Conversion.
9. Describe the Security Concerns of Implementation.
10. Describe the Evaluation Process.
ASU Industrial Ecology Vision Research Field & Source of Inspiration Discussion
Romania Case Study: Please review the video and follow the rubric posted below.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtReTQSm6ac ...
ASU Industrial Ecology Vision Research Field & Source of Inspiration Discussion
Romania Case Study: Please review the video and follow the rubric posted below.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtReTQSm6ac&feature=youtu.beFor each of the case studies, students will prepare an assessment of between 1,100 and 1,200 words of text, 1.5 spaced. Each case study should have a separate bibliography including at least 2 references (not including the videos), using APA format. Header and bibliography does not count towards word count. Each assessment should have:TitleTopic sentence (a single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned)Situation assessment (What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?)Lessons learned (this should include not just the lessons learned by the consulting engineer as expressed in the case study, but the lessons learned by the student looking at the case study as a whole)RubricSummer 2020 Case Study RubricSummer 2020 Case Study RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle2.5 ptsFull MarksTitle present.0.0 ptsNo MarksTitle not present.2.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Sentence2.5 ptsFull MarksA single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned.0.0 ptsNo MarksTopic sentence not present.2.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSituation Assessment15.0 ptsFull MarksThe following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?8.0 ptsPartial MarksSome of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?0.0 ptsNo MarksNone of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of ESEM Principles15.0 ptsFull MarksESEM principles are mentioned and discussed in the essay.8.0 ptsPartial MarksESEM principles are mentioned but not discussed in the essay.0.0 ptsNo MarksESEM principles are not mentioned or discussed in the essay.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLessons Learned10.0 ptsFull MarksLessons of the consultant engineer and the student are present.5.0 ptsPartial MarksOnly lessons learned by the consultant engineer or the student are present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo lessons learned are present.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBetween 1,100 and 1,200 Words20.0 ptsFull MarksWithin given range.10.0 ptsPartial MarksWithin 100 words over or under.0.0 ptsNo MarksUnder 1,000 words or above 1,300 words.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper Grammar and Spelling20.0 ptsFull MarksNo errors or minor grammar and spelling errors.10.0 ptsPartial PointsSpelling and grammar errors distract from essay.0.0 ptsNo MarksSpelling and grammar errors make essay incomprehensible.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1.5 Spacing5.0 ptsFull Marks1.5 spacing used.0.0 ptsNo Marks1.5 spacing not used.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2 ReferencesCredit only awarded for the following two criteria if 2 references are present.0.0 ptsFull Marks0.0 ptsNo Marks0.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn-text APA Citations5.0 ptsFull MarksIn-text APA citations present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo in-text citations or APA not used.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Bibliography5.0 ptsFull MarksAPA bibliography present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo bibliography or APA not used.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0
SNHU Week 8 Technology Financial & Energy Sectors ETFs Discussion
8-2 Jupyter Notebook (Discussion Prep)External Learning ToolThis activity will take you to the Jupyter Notebook contain ...
SNHU Week 8 Technology Financial & Energy Sectors ETFs Discussion
8-2 Jupyter Notebook (Discussion Prep)External Learning ToolThis activity will take you to the Jupyter Notebook containing the Python scripts for your Module Eight discussion. It is highly recommended that you read through the discussion prompt before completing your work in this notebook. When you are finished completing and running the Python scripts, begin work on your initial discussion post.Note: This task is not graded, but you will be required to attach your completed Jupyter notebook to your discussion post in the next activity.
8-3 Discussion: One-Way ANOVADiscussion Topic Starts Jun 12, 2021 8:59 PMUse the link in the Jupyter Notebook activity to access your Python script. Once you have made your calculations, complete this discussion. The script will output answers to the questions given below. You must attach your Python script output as an HTML file and respond to the questions below.In this discussion, you will apply the statistical concepts and techniques covered in this week's reading about one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). An investment analyst is evaluating the 10-year mean return on investment for industry-specific exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for three sectors: financial, energy, and technology. The analyst obtains a random sample of 30 ETFs for each sector and calculates the 10-year return of each ETF. The analyst has provided you with this data set. Run Step 1 in the Python script to upload the data file.Using the sample data, perform one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Evaluate whether the average return of at least one of the industry-specific ETFs is significantly different. Use a 5% level of significance.In your initial post, address the following items:
Define the null and alternative hypothesis in mathematical terms and in words.
Report the level of significance.
Include the t3st statistic and the P-value. See Step 2 in the Python script.
Provide your conclusion and interpretation of the t3st. Should the null hypothesis be rejected? Why or why not?
Does a side-by-side boxplot of the 10-year returns of ETFs from the three sectors confirm your conclusion of the hypothesis test? Why or why not? See Step 3 in the Python script.
In your follow-up posts to other students, review your peers' results and provide some analysis and interpretation:
What does a post-hoc t3st (like Tukey's HSD t3st) contribute after one-way ANOVA is performed?
Comment on your peers' results and compare them with your own.
Remember to attach your Python output and respond to all questions in your initial and follow-up posts. Be sure to clearly communicate your ideas using appropriate terminology.
Reply to Student
John Latulippe posted Jun 21, 2021 3:57 PM
Subscribe
Ho: u1 = u2 = … = uk
Ha: ui ? uj, for some i ? j
Level of significance = 0.05 or 5%
Test statistic, F = 55.07
P-value = 0.0
Yes. The null hypothesis, Ho should be rejected since the p-value of 0.0 is less than the significant level of 0.05 sufficient evidence exists to reject the null hypothesis, Ho for the alternative hypothesis, Ha.
5. Yes. The one-way ANOVA compares the means of three or more groups of one predictor variable. There are at least two groups with unequal means. If you examine the box plot you can see that the energy ETF and technology ETF mean are unequal to the financial ETF mean. Both ETF's have a higher mean than the financial ETF.
CU Qualitative Research & Securing Respondents Discussion
Discuss the effectiveness of the following sampling designs:A research company obtains a sample for a focus group through ...
CU Qualitative Research & Securing Respondents Discussion
Discuss the effectiveness of the following sampling designs:A research company obtains a sample for a focus group through organized groups such as church groups, clubs, and schools. The organizations are paid for securing respondents; no individual is directly compensated.A citizen’s group interested in generating public and financial support for a new university basketball arena prints a questionnaire in area newspapers. Readers return the questionnaires by mail.A department store that wishes to examine whether the store is losing or gaining customers draws a sample from its list of credit card holders by selecting every tenth name.
University of the Cumberlands Workplace Issues Case Discussion
Part 1 – Identify a ProblemProblem solving starts by being able to identify existing problems, gaps in service, ineffici ...
University of the Cumberlands Workplace Issues Case Discussion
Part 1 – Identify a ProblemProblem solving starts by being able to identify existing problems, gaps in service, inefficient systems/processes, flawed policies, or any other areas of our job/career where improvement is needed. Identify a problem or gap at your workplace and explain why/how this problem exists.Part 2 – Solve the ProblemUse your knowledge that you’ve learned in the program (or hope to learn in a future course) to implement a plan to solve the problem.Grading Expectations: Fully answer both parts of the assignment.Word requirement: 400-500 wordsI have taken security architecture and design course so using that course we should answer this above 2 parts
Similar Content
CMPE 165 San Jose State University Achieving Competitive Advantage Exam
Textbook(Required)Jeffrey K. Pinto, Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage, 5thEdition, New York, NY: Pearson...
1&2 in different docs with APA format and citations need without plagarism 450 words each with responses 2 -vy
1)Cloud computing represents one of the most significant paradigms shifts in information technology (IT) history. Th...
ISOL 632 ACE Business Impact Analysis & Recovery Planning Essay
Q1. What are the most vital functions at your place of work that the BIA will address?Requirement1. APA Fortmat 7th ed.2. ...
CE 341A MGTC Consolidation Consolidation Lab Results Analysis
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamSc...
kinematics project "MATLAB"
Project 1: Plot Path for Point P on CouplerInstruction:Plot the path of P in question (c), Scott-Russel straight line link...
Ethical Implications - Construction Failure Report
Hello , i want someone to help me with my homework . its a Construction safety class I will post a PDF attachment has all ...
Experiment 10
Three harmonics were isolated which in part constituted a non-sinusoidal waveform. Specifically, the fundamental, third, a...
Chemical Engineering 1
(a) The weight (in lbf) of a 30.0 lbm object. The weight of an object is the force and its measurement of the pull of grav...
Lab Report Schematic
Part 2-1A: Compare KVL/KCL Analysis to Voltmeter/Ammeter. The aim of this lab experiment is to analyze parallel and series...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Univerisity of The Cumberlands Testing Maintenance and Auditing Process Questions
1. Describe TQM, Six Sigma and CMM (CMMI).
2. What is a Structured Walk-thru?
3. What are Service-Oriented Architectures?
...
Univerisity of The Cumberlands Testing Maintenance and Auditing Process Questions
1. Describe TQM, Six Sigma and CMM (CMMI).
2. What is a Structured Walk-thru?
3. What are Service-Oriented Architectures?
4. Describe the use of Documentation and Procedure Manuals.
5. Describe the Testing, Maintenance and Auditing process.
6. Describe how Systems are Distributed.
7. Describe how Training is conducted during Implementation.
8. Describe System Conversion.
9. Describe the Security Concerns of Implementation.
10. Describe the Evaluation Process.
ASU Industrial Ecology Vision Research Field & Source of Inspiration Discussion
Romania Case Study: Please review the video and follow the rubric posted below.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtReTQSm6ac ...
ASU Industrial Ecology Vision Research Field & Source of Inspiration Discussion
Romania Case Study: Please review the video and follow the rubric posted below.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtReTQSm6ac&feature=youtu.beFor each of the case studies, students will prepare an assessment of between 1,100 and 1,200 words of text, 1.5 spaced. Each case study should have a separate bibliography including at least 2 references (not including the videos), using APA format. Header and bibliography does not count towards word count. Each assessment should have:TitleTopic sentence (a single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned)Situation assessment (What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?)Lessons learned (this should include not just the lessons learned by the consulting engineer as expressed in the case study, but the lessons learned by the student looking at the case study as a whole)RubricSummer 2020 Case Study RubricSummer 2020 Case Study RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle2.5 ptsFull MarksTitle present.0.0 ptsNo MarksTitle not present.2.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Sentence2.5 ptsFull MarksA single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned.0.0 ptsNo MarksTopic sentence not present.2.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSituation Assessment15.0 ptsFull MarksThe following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?8.0 ptsPartial MarksSome of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?0.0 ptsNo MarksNone of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of ESEM Principles15.0 ptsFull MarksESEM principles are mentioned and discussed in the essay.8.0 ptsPartial MarksESEM principles are mentioned but not discussed in the essay.0.0 ptsNo MarksESEM principles are not mentioned or discussed in the essay.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLessons Learned10.0 ptsFull MarksLessons of the consultant engineer and the student are present.5.0 ptsPartial MarksOnly lessons learned by the consultant engineer or the student are present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo lessons learned are present.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBetween 1,100 and 1,200 Words20.0 ptsFull MarksWithin given range.10.0 ptsPartial MarksWithin 100 words over or under.0.0 ptsNo MarksUnder 1,000 words or above 1,300 words.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper Grammar and Spelling20.0 ptsFull MarksNo errors or minor grammar and spelling errors.10.0 ptsPartial PointsSpelling and grammar errors distract from essay.0.0 ptsNo MarksSpelling and grammar errors make essay incomprehensible.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1.5 Spacing5.0 ptsFull Marks1.5 spacing used.0.0 ptsNo Marks1.5 spacing not used.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2 ReferencesCredit only awarded for the following two criteria if 2 references are present.0.0 ptsFull Marks0.0 ptsNo Marks0.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn-text APA Citations5.0 ptsFull MarksIn-text APA citations present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo in-text citations or APA not used.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Bibliography5.0 ptsFull MarksAPA bibliography present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo bibliography or APA not used.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0
SNHU Week 8 Technology Financial & Energy Sectors ETFs Discussion
8-2 Jupyter Notebook (Discussion Prep)External Learning ToolThis activity will take you to the Jupyter Notebook contain ...
SNHU Week 8 Technology Financial & Energy Sectors ETFs Discussion
8-2 Jupyter Notebook (Discussion Prep)External Learning ToolThis activity will take you to the Jupyter Notebook containing the Python scripts for your Module Eight discussion. It is highly recommended that you read through the discussion prompt before completing your work in this notebook. When you are finished completing and running the Python scripts, begin work on your initial discussion post.Note: This task is not graded, but you will be required to attach your completed Jupyter notebook to your discussion post in the next activity.
8-3 Discussion: One-Way ANOVADiscussion Topic Starts Jun 12, 2021 8:59 PMUse the link in the Jupyter Notebook activity to access your Python script. Once you have made your calculations, complete this discussion. The script will output answers to the questions given below. You must attach your Python script output as an HTML file and respond to the questions below.In this discussion, you will apply the statistical concepts and techniques covered in this week's reading about one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). An investment analyst is evaluating the 10-year mean return on investment for industry-specific exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for three sectors: financial, energy, and technology. The analyst obtains a random sample of 30 ETFs for each sector and calculates the 10-year return of each ETF. The analyst has provided you with this data set. Run Step 1 in the Python script to upload the data file.Using the sample data, perform one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Evaluate whether the average return of at least one of the industry-specific ETFs is significantly different. Use a 5% level of significance.In your initial post, address the following items:
Define the null and alternative hypothesis in mathematical terms and in words.
Report the level of significance.
Include the t3st statistic and the P-value. See Step 2 in the Python script.
Provide your conclusion and interpretation of the t3st. Should the null hypothesis be rejected? Why or why not?
Does a side-by-side boxplot of the 10-year returns of ETFs from the three sectors confirm your conclusion of the hypothesis test? Why or why not? See Step 3 in the Python script.
In your follow-up posts to other students, review your peers' results and provide some analysis and interpretation:
What does a post-hoc t3st (like Tukey's HSD t3st) contribute after one-way ANOVA is performed?
Comment on your peers' results and compare them with your own.
Remember to attach your Python output and respond to all questions in your initial and follow-up posts. Be sure to clearly communicate your ideas using appropriate terminology.
Reply to Student
John Latulippe posted Jun 21, 2021 3:57 PM
Subscribe
Ho: u1 = u2 = … = uk
Ha: ui ? uj, for some i ? j
Level of significance = 0.05 or 5%
Test statistic, F = 55.07
P-value = 0.0
Yes. The null hypothesis, Ho should be rejected since the p-value of 0.0 is less than the significant level of 0.05 sufficient evidence exists to reject the null hypothesis, Ho for the alternative hypothesis, Ha.
5. Yes. The one-way ANOVA compares the means of three or more groups of one predictor variable. There are at least two groups with unequal means. If you examine the box plot you can see that the energy ETF and technology ETF mean are unequal to the financial ETF mean. Both ETF's have a higher mean than the financial ETF.
CU Qualitative Research & Securing Respondents Discussion
Discuss the effectiveness of the following sampling designs:A research company obtains a sample for a focus group through ...
CU Qualitative Research & Securing Respondents Discussion
Discuss the effectiveness of the following sampling designs:A research company obtains a sample for a focus group through organized groups such as church groups, clubs, and schools. The organizations are paid for securing respondents; no individual is directly compensated.A citizen’s group interested in generating public and financial support for a new university basketball arena prints a questionnaire in area newspapers. Readers return the questionnaires by mail.A department store that wishes to examine whether the store is losing or gaining customers draws a sample from its list of credit card holders by selecting every tenth name.
University of the Cumberlands Workplace Issues Case Discussion
Part 1 – Identify a ProblemProblem solving starts by being able to identify existing problems, gaps in service, ineffici ...
University of the Cumberlands Workplace Issues Case Discussion
Part 1 – Identify a ProblemProblem solving starts by being able to identify existing problems, gaps in service, inefficient systems/processes, flawed policies, or any other areas of our job/career where improvement is needed. Identify a problem or gap at your workplace and explain why/how this problem exists.Part 2 – Solve the ProblemUse your knowledge that you’ve learned in the program (or hope to learn in a future course) to implement a plan to solve the problem.Grading Expectations: Fully answer both parts of the assignment.Word requirement: 400-500 wordsI have taken security architecture and design course so using that course we should answer this above 2 parts
Earn money selling
your Study Documents
