1. Read and annotate one of the following stories from American Short Stories anthology. The Lottery (135)A&P (259)Miriam (147)The Wooing of Ariadne (299)Where Have You Gone Charming Billy? (337)Everything Stuck to Him (349) 2. Select two types of criticism (from the chart above) that you would like to apply to a short analysis of the story you read. Now, this is what you need to accomplish: 3. Write a one-paragraph (minimum 12 sentences) analysis of the story for each of the two types of criticism you selected. For each paragraph, include: A hook.A brief summary.An arguable thesis related to the type of criticism and the theme of the story.At least 2 embedded/direct quotations from the text that support your thesis with a lead in and commentary for each.A thesis echo.A clincher. 4.Revise and edit your paragraphs for logic, unity, and completeness. To ensure success, read the Writing Assignment: Talk the Talk rubricPick the type of critisism from the attached chart.

Chapter 1: Choose one of the forensic sciences (other than psychology) discussed in the chapter. Provide a detailed description of the field, including why this profession is considered “forensic.” Chapter 2: (Two parts) Describe the five officer profiles that are prone to excessive force complaints as identified by Scrivner. Describe the operating procedure in a large agency after an officer is involved in a shooting incident. Chapter 3: Poythress et al. (1993) made recommendations for forensic psychologists to follow when performing psychological autopsies or equivocal death analyses. Describe two of these recommendations. Chapter 4: (Two parts) Describe actuarial predictions, clinical predictions, and structured professional judgment. What does the research tell us about each in relation to risk assessment?Compare and contrast the Daubert standard and the Frye standard for evaluating expert testimony. Chapter 5: How do the trials of Theodore Kaczynski and Colin Ferguson pertain to competency in individuals with mental disorders? What changes in the legal system did these two trials bring about?NO PLAGIARISMSOURCES ARE NEEDED.

ENG/200: Rhetoric And ResearchWk 4 – Self-Assessment Worksheet [due Mon]Assignment ContentRefer to your in-progress persuasive essay draft. You may find it helpful to make revision notes on your draft as you work on this assignment.Complete the Self-Assessment Worksheet with full-sentence responses.Use your completed worksheet and any notes you made as you revise your draft for the final paper due at the end of Week 5.Submit your worksheet.Resources:University LibraryCenter for Writing ExcellenceReference and Citation GeneratorGrammar and Writing GuidesSelf-Assessment WorksheetWhat strategies did you use to appeal to your audience? How effective do you feel you have been in convincing the readers to agree with your position? Mark any passages that need improvement or additional support. Pay attention to areas where your instructor has provided feedback. What part of this paper are you the most proud of? Include a quotation and/or description from your essay as an example. Explain why you think this part is effective. How might you amplify strengths like this in the final paper? Make a note to yourself within your draft to remind you where you want to expand on the strengths you’ve mentioned. Review your thesis statement in the introduction and any comments from your instructor and include it here on the worksheet. Is your thesis statement a complete sentence that reflects the main argument and does it contain 3 supporting reasons? If not, what changes will you make to revise it? (Review the readings related to writing and refining your thesis in the Week 1 learning activities if you need additional support.) How, specifically, did you get the reader’s attention in the introduction? What style or approach did you use, and what did you hope to achieve by using it? If this part of your paper needs improvement, what strategy might you try instead? Why might this be a stronger strategy? Apply that change to the final paper. Examine the research you collected and used for support. In your rough draft, underline or highlight all the places where you have used evidence within the paper. Is each body paragraph supported by at least one piece of evidence, and is it compelling? Does the research come from multiple sources, of which at least one is peer-reviewed? Make a note to yourself about places within each paragraph where you will want to revise the evidence you present and where you might need to add research to support your ideas. Check the citations against the references. Do they match up? If not, what revision must you make? Do you feel that your paper shows a fair and balanced approach to your issue? If so, what did you do within the paper to ensure that was the case? If not, what specific changes will you make to be more balanced in your argument? How did you overcome any personal bias? Go to the last paragraph of your paper and read the last sentence of that paragraph. Does the sentence make sense? Does it use proper grammar, punctuation, and any APA style necessary? If not, make note of the changes you will need to make during revision. Do this same type of review moving backwards through the essay, sentence by sentence. As you review your writing in this way, you might notice errors and patterns that you missed when reading from beginning to end. What did you discover in terms of research content, style, language, or grammar in your draft? What are at least 2 resources that you can use to help strengthen and support your writing in these areas?Use one of the reviewing services available in the Center for Writing Excellence to review this document. What are the next steps you will take to revise your draft and prepare to finalize your paper?