Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health care and outcomes for your target population.Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.Assessment InstructionsScenarioThe analysis of position papers that your interprofessional team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interprofessional team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interprofessional teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.InstructionsFor this assessment you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for the health care issue and target population you addressed in Assessment 1. If for some reason you wish to change your specific issue and/or target population, contact your FlexPath faculty.The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.Additional RequirementsLength of proposal: 2–4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive.Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.APA formatting: Use the APA Style Paper Template linked in the Resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your analysis.Suggested ResourcesThe resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6026 – Biopsychosocial Concepts for Advanced Nursing Practice II Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.Access to CareBrooks, E., Dailey, N. K., Bair, B. D., & Shore, J. H. (2016) Listening to the patient: Women veterans' insights about health care needs, access, and quality in rural areas. Military Medicine, 181(9), 976–981.Caldwell, J. T., Ford, C. L., Wallace, S. P., Wang, M. C., & Takahashi, L. M. (2016). Intersection of living in a rural versus urban area and race/ethnicity in explaining access to health care in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 106(8), 1463–1469.Linder, J. A. & Levine, D. M. (2016). Health care communication technology and improved access, continuity, and relationships: The revolution will be Uberized. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(5), 643–644.SHOW LESSAssessmentBorrayo, B. D., & O'Lawrence, H. (2016). A post analysis of a preventive and chronic healthcare tool. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 39(1), 15–40.Vila Health: Resources for Topical Research | Transcript.PathophysiologyMaulsby, C., Valdiserri, R. O., Kim, J. J., Mahon, N., Flynn, A., Eriksson, E., . . . Holtgrave, D. R. (2016). The global engagement in care convening: Recommended actions to improve health outcomes for people living with HIV. AIDS Education & Prevention, 28(5), 405–416.Pranavchand, R., & Reddy, M. (2016). Genomics era and complex disorders: Implications of GWAS with special reference to coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cancers. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 62(3), 188–198.PharmacologyBland, J. (2016). Where is health care headed? Integrative Medicine, 15(3), 16–18.PolicyDurbin, A., Durbin, J., Hensel, J., & Deber, R. (2016). Barriers and enablers to integrating mental health into primary care: A policy analysis. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 43(1), 127–139.Gershon, R., Morris, L., & Ferguson, W. (2016). Including language access into Medicaid ACO design. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 44(3), 492–502.Shariff, N. (2014). Factors that act as facilitators and barriers to nurse leaders' participation in health policy development. BMC Nursing, 13, 20.TechnologyRamsey, A., Lord, S., Torrey, J., Marsch, L., & Lardiere, M. (2016). Paving the way to successful implementation: Identifying key barriers to use of technology-based therapeutic tools for behavioral health care. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 43(1), 54–70.Course Resources and TemplatesAPA Style Paper Template [DOCX].APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX].APA ModuleGuiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal [DOC].Nursing Masters (MSN) Research Guide.

While true experiments contain the highest degree of control, they are not always possible in some situations. Quasi-experiments are similar to experiments in that they include some type of manipulation to compare two or more conditions; however, they do not have complete control over the variables in a study. Thus, they do not meet all of the conditions required for an experiment. Select one of the quasi-experimental designs discussed in the chapter and propose your own study that would use that design. Explain why that design is necessary over an experimental design. With respect to your proposed study, discuss some of the potential threats to validity and how those may impact the overall results. How could you change your proposed study to make it a true experimental design? Post should be at least 300 words.

Can a well-planned sales call ever need adjustment and if so why, or if not, why? 300 words onl