MG371 Park Growth Pains at Mountain States Healthcare Case Analysis
You are to work alone to analyze and prepare answers/solutions for the case analysis. The text should be your primary source of information for this activity. Consolidate your response into one file and submit it to your instructor not later than Sunday midnight central time of Unit 7. Submit your Case Analysis assignment by uploading it to this page.Case Analysis MethodTo begin your Case Analysis, examine the MG371 Case: Growth Pains at Mountain States Healthcare.Your paper should contain at a minimum:PART 1 – Definition of the situation: minimum of one page, single spaced, Verdana 12 point font.Definition of the situation should be a thorough description of the organization and the present situation with detailed personal opinions and views. PART 2 – Analysis of the Situation: minimum of two pages, single spaced, Verdana 12 point font.Analysis of the situation should be a detailed analysis of the management process, organization, contributing factors, and other variables. It should include detailed application of course learning objectives. The course learning outcomes for MG 371 are:
The student will: Assess application of the management process (planning, organizing, leading, controlling).
The student will: Select between alternative strategies to strengthen the organization’s competitive advantage.
The student will: Evaluate methods to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals. Evaluation
The student will: Differentiate between management practices within a domestic context and within a global context. Evaluation
The student will: Contrast outcomes of managerial strategies that employ social responsibility and ethics versus strategies that do not.
When composing your case analysis consider the following concepts that you have studied in this course;Management Skills, The Management Process, Management Ethics, Social Responsibility, Workforce Diversity, National Cultures, Managing in the Global Environment, Managerial Decision Making, Group Decision Making, The Planning Process, Functional Level, Business Level, and Corporate Level Strategies, Organizational Structure, Output Control and Behavior Control, Expectancy Theory, Needs Theory, Equity Theory, Trait and Behavior Models of leadership, Situational Leadership, Managing Organizational Change, Managing Groups and Teams, Group Dynamics, Recruitment and Selection of Employees, Communication and Information, Management Information Systems, Operations Management, And other factors.PART 3 – Recommendations: minimum of one page, single spaced, Verdana 12 point font.The Recommendations section should provide a comprehensive identification of the selected single best solution and explain why it is perceived to be the best solution. It also includes a complete implementation plan which thoroughly describes the courses of action and order of sequence for their adoption by all levels of management. Case Study Rubric You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. Case Study Rubric CriteriaRatings Pts Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO1 _7739Assessment of the use of each of the management process components (planning, organizing, leading, controlling).view longer descriptionAssessment of the use of each of the management process components (planning, organizing, leading, controlling).Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts ExceptionalProvide a detailed and comprehensive assessment of management’s planning, leading, organizing, and controlling practices.blankEdit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts Exceeds ExpectationsProvide a complete assessment of management’s planning, leading, organizing, and controlling practices._7411Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts Meets ExpectationsProvide a reasonable but limited assessment of management’s planning, leading, organizing, and controlling practices._2069Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >10.0 pts Does Not Meet ExpectationsProvide an incomplete assessment of management’s planning, organizing, leading, and controlling practices._6703Edit ratingDelete rating10.0 to >0 pts UnacceptableProvide an incomplete assessment of management’s planning, organizing, leading, and controlling practices that misses major concepts or application.blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 50.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO2 _9510Critique of strategies selected and applied to create competitive advantages.view longer descriptionCritique of strategies selected and applied to create competitive advantages.Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts ExceptionalProvide a detailed and comprehensive critique of the strategies managers select to create competitive advantage._3693Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts Exceeds ExpectationsProvide a complete critique of the strategies managers select to create competitive advantage._3589Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts Meets ExpectationsProvide a reasonable but limited critique of strategies managers select to create competitive advantage._5804Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >10.0 pts Does Not Meet ExpectationsProvide an incomplete critique of strategies managers select to create competitive advantage._844Edit ratingDelete rating10.0 to >0 pts UnacceptableProvide an incomplete critique of strategies managers select to create competitive advantage that misses major concepts or application._6041 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 50.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO3 _9984Critique of the methods selected and applied to motivate followers to achieve organizational goalsview longer descriptionCritique of the methods selected and applied to motivate followers to achieve organizational goalsRange threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts ExceptionalProvide a detailed and comprehensive critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals._9444Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts Exceeds ExpectationsProvide a complete critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals._2658Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts Meets ExpectationsProvide a reasonable but limited critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals._2436Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >10.0 pts Does Not Meet ExpectationsProvide an incomplete critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals._2667Edit ratingDelete rating10.0 to >0 pts UnacceptableProvide an incomplete critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals that misses major concepts or application._7191 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 50.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO4 _4402Evaluation of management practices within a domestic environment versus those within a global environment.view longer descriptionEvaluation of management practices within a domestic environment versus those within a global environment.Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts ExceptionalProvide a detailed and comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments._9818Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts Exceeds ExpectationsProvide a complete evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments._4969Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts Meets ExpectationsProvide a reasonable but limited evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments._9928Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >10.0 pts Does Not Meet ExpectationsProvide an incomplete evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments._9875Edit ratingDelete rating10.0 to >0 pts UnacceptableProvide an incomplete evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments that misses major concepts or application._2065 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 50.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO5 _4839Evaluation of outcomes of management practices based upon their inclusion of ethics and social responsibility.view longer descriptionEvaluation of outcomes of management practices based upon their inclusion of ethics and social responsibility.Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts ExceptionalProvide a detailed and comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility._7846Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts Exceeds ExpectationsProvide a complete evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility._3593Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts Meets ExpectationsProvide a reasonable but limited evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility._7854Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >10.0 pts Does Not Meet ExpectationsProvide an incomplete evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility._396Edit ratingDelete rating10.0 to >0 pts UnacceptableProvide an incomplete evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility that misses major concepts or application._1539 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 50.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionview longer descriptionRange threshold: 5 pts Edit ratingDelete rating5to >0 pts Full MarksblankEdit ratingDelete rating0to >0 pts No Marksblank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5 pts -- Total Points: 250.0