For this assignment, again, it is beneficial that you keep the topic you would like to research for the capstone proposal in mind. The capstone will require a literature review for your proposal, of which you may use articles obtained during this course. Topic: Increase in stress leads to decrease in health. Select a peer-reviewed, experimental research study which exemplifies a two-group design and a factorial design (use keywords method, results, and discussion in your Boolean search). These studies can be found using tools such as the GCU Library and Google Scholar. Write a 500-750-word paper in which you: Compare the two research designs Identify the independent variable (s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable Identify main effects and interactions for the factorial design Explain if the study have a random sample and/or random assignment? Were there other limitations that were noticed? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.Note: First, this essay should have an intro. In the intro, include a thesis statement. Ex: "The purpose of this paper is to..." Second, you need to cover the four main points of the essay. Be very explanatory. Third, you need to make sure this essay has a very good conclusion. Fourth, the references from this essay MUST be from the GCU library website. Do not attain references anywhere else. Finally, if you do not have knowledge of this subject, please don't attempt to do it. I will ask for a refund if I do not receive work that is of high quality.

I am attaching a copy of the directions called assigment2. I have some areas that I have completed and others where you need to fill in the parts. I am also attaching papers and articles that you will need to useAttachment document6 is a paper on trustworthiness you can use that for PART 4 of the paper. Attachment 1088868309343290 is a paper for PART 4 Attachment USW1_RSCH_8310_Yob_workingTowardTheCommonGoodArticle-2.pdf is for PART 1.

Part One: Identifications. 5pts/ID = 30%For each of the six concepts below, please provide a brief definition in your own words explaining what the concept means. For each concept, please provide an example from our course materials that helps to illustrate what the term means/why it is significant. Readings, lectures, slides, clips/documentaries are all fair game for use as examples.1.) Naturalistic Fallacy2.) Dualism/Binary Schema3.) Intersectionality4.) Biopower5.) Epistemology6.) PatriarchyPart Two: Short Answer. 35%/prompt = 70% Please choose two (2) of the following three prompts to answer. Approximate length (can be shorter or longer, don’t worry!): 3 paragraphs for each prompt. Please provide at least two examples to substantiate your response for each prompt.In-text citations are not required, but are just fine to use. If citations or paraphrases are used, please include brief citation information (last name, page number). No works cited page is necessary.Please use 11 or 12pt. Times New Roman font and please 1.5 or double spaceparagraphs.Please remember to insert page numbers and a header with full name as well as your section number (01, 02, 03, or 04). Thank you!! Happy Writing!!2Payne WMNST 382 Spring 2021 Midterm #1 Due Friday February 26thPrompt #1:During the first few weeks of the semester, we began by discussing some of the traditional approaches to studying science and technology. Following this, we reflected on the challenges posed to these traditional studies of science by those whose approach we might usefully bring together under the umbrella term ‘social construction.’ First, please identify and describe the general characteristics and assumptions of traditional approaches (positivism, falsificationism, functionalism) to the study of science.Then, please identify and describe some of the critiques that subsequent social constructionists posed to traditional approaches? Finally, flip the tables once more: what are potential critiques of the social constructionist approaches to the study of science?(Remember to include at least two examples when answer this prompt! Thanks!)Prompt # 2:Both feminist equity studies and feminist analyses of the uses of language/rhetoric and imagery identify gendered disparities in science. In their own ways, both equity studies and studies of language and imagery contend that science has been and continues to be gendered.First, please describe the field of feminist equity studies in relation to STEM. What do equity studies, well, study? That is, what are the points of interest and objects of analysis in equity studies? What are some of the typical findings of feminist equity studies in general and with respect to STEM specifically? That is, what are some of the historical and ongoing patterns identified in feminist equity studies? What are some of the potential sources/reasons that might explain the patterns of findings in feminist equity studies in relation to STEM? What variables cause or are correlated with the disparities identified?Continued on following page...3Payne WMNST 382 Spring 2021 Midterm #1 Due Friday February 26thNext, please describe the role (historically and/or currently) of gendered language and imagery in relation to science, technology, and medicine. When analysts of language and imagery contend that ‘science is gendered,’ what does this mean? How is science gendered in terms of language and imagery?(Remember to include at least two examples when answer this prompt! Thanks!)Prompt # 3:Standpoint theories maintain that paying explicit attention to 1.) historically and currently less powerful and privileged social experiences and perspectives (in terms of gender, race, class identities/relations etc.) as well as 2.) the roles of politics and ethics in STEM will result in the attainment of more and better knowledge, including more objective scientific, technological, and medical knowledge.First, please explain the logic behind feminist standpoint theories. What initialpremisesinform these theories, and what punchlines or conclusions do they arrive at? Next, please identify and describe some of the critiques that have been made of standpoint theories by traditional approaches? (Hint: think of objectivity)Finally, please identify and explain some of the critiques that have been made of standpoint theories by intersectional approaches? (Hint: think of essentialism)(Remember to include at least two examples when answer this prompt! Thanks!)