Answer the following study questions in a 300-word minimum essay, 100 words minimum for each of the 3 questions posed, naming, quoting, and citing the assigned sources, i.e., your textbook, the documentary film, a Recorded Lecture OR a Powerpoint Lecture at least once each for all three required sources. Do not answer in bullet points or in a numbered list, but write at least 3 full paragraphs, one paragraph in response to each of the questions posed of a minimum length of 100-words each. At the end of your essay  YOU MUST post a study question of your own for your fellow students to consider and answer in their response posts. Your 300-word minimum primary post in response to all questions of my prompt in essay form is DUE before end of day, SATURDAY 9/25. Your two response posts, each 100-word minimum essays of substantial content answering the Study Questions posed by two different fellow students, are DUE before 11:59 pm SUNDAY 9/26.  EVENTHOUGH THE DISC. BOARD IS OPEN UNTIL END OF DAY SUNDAY 9/26, YOUR PRIMARY POST ESSAY MUST BE IN BEFORE END OF DAY ON SATURDAY 9/25 FOR IT TO EARN CREDIT.  PROMPT: 1. What were the various reasons portrayed in the film as to why Americans favored America's  entrance into the Imperial Age? Who opposed America's foray into Imperialism and why? 2. What role did world events, i.e., actions and/or inactions of the Empires of Europe, have on America's entrance into war with Spain? How was America's involvement in Cuba both similar and different than our involvement in the Philippines? 3. What have you learned about the Spanish American War and the Philippine "Insurgency" that you did not know before? What effect does it have on you today? *** I recommend you write your essay FIRST on a word processing program and either copy and paste it into the submission window OR upload your saved file instead. Either options is okay with me. Your 300-word minimum essay based on my prompt for this assignment and your 100-word minimum response posts to two fellow students are all due SATURDAY 10/3 before 11:59 PM***IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU ALL POST YOUR FIRST ESSAYS EARLY ENOUGH FOR OTHERS TO HAVE STUDY QUESTIONS TO RESPOND TO BEFORE YOU ALL RUN OUT OF TIME AND THE ASSIGNMENT CLOSES BEFORE YOU HAVE COMPLETED ALL RESPONSES.*** DO NOT FORGET TO FINISH YOUR ENTRY WITH A STUDY QUESTION OF YOUR OWN.

This assignment is straight forward on the directions. Make sure you do not plagiarize and cite your source. Only paying for good quality writing. This assignment is due Sunday before 10pm pacific time. I link the doument that you can go based on for the topic of the Ethical Dilemma Course Project. For the Peer Review, all students will submit by Wednesday their Introduction and Background of the Case for their Ethical Dilemma Course Project. Each student will respond to the submissions of at least two other students using either a written response or a spoken audio recording that offers an Application of the Law and Code of Ethics to the case.For legal information, consult https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex (Links to an external site.) or https://www.nolo.com/legal-research (Links to an external site.) or https://www.findlaw.com (Links to an external site.) Application of the LawIdentify the legal issues (e.g., specific laws or rules) that were violated or that might have arisen or that could have been invoked (Constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law, case law, common law, civil law, criminal law, national law, international law). Name or list specific laws that apply or that you think might to the case. Cite all sources using APA documentation style.Code of EthicsIdentify the professional and/or corporate code of ethics that applies to the case. Download and review Week 5: ETHC232 Professional Codes of Ethics. (Links to an external site.)Using one of the professional codes on that list and/or, as appropriate, an online code from a business or industry that directly applies to the case, determine what the ethical priorities are and the nature of the commitment to ethical behavior. Identify in the code the stakeholders and the specific procedures or policies that clarify what is acceptable and unacceptable conduct. Detail some specific ways in which the interest and welfare of various stakeholders are protected. Apply the code to the circumstances of the case. Did the code of ethics apply effectively to the case? Would the outcome have changed had the stakeholders followed the principles and priorities of the code? What, if anything, is missing from the code that might have prevented the ethical issue in the first place?