Case brief

User Generated

qunun

Business Finance

Description

Assignment #2:

• In your own words, write a case brief of the Supreme Court's decision in Safford v. Redding (2009). You can find the entirety of the opinion at the following link: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-479.ZO.h...

• You do not need to read or discuss any concurring or dissenting opinions in your brief, just brief the majority opinion.

Use 12-point, Times New Roman font, single-spaced.

Include a heading at the top of your paper. In your heading, remember to indicate: your name / the class, the course CRN #, and the instructor / the assignment # / and the date. For example, a proper heading would look like this:

Jimmy Jones

Criminal Law CRN# 20067, Prof. Carvill

Assignment #2

3/9/18

• Failure to include a proper heading will result in a 10% grade reduction (-10 points).

You must follow the case brief format. Minimally, your case brief should include the following sections and they should be clearly labeled:

Case Name & Citation:

Court Issuing the Opinion:

Procedural History:

Facts:

Issue:

Holding:

Reasoning/Rationale:

Single-spaced, your brief should be no more than one full page in length. It should not be less than half a page in length.

Write in complete sentences and use proper grammar. Widespread grammatical errors will hinder your clarity and your grade.

Assignment #2 must be submitted to this Blackboard dropbox by end of day on 10/10/2018.

Your submissions will all be checked by the Safe Assign plagiarism detection software. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Write in your own words to the extent possible. A Safe Assign match report of 60% or higher will be potential grounds for a grade reduction.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Student Name
Class
Course
Instructor
Assignment
Date
Case Name & Citation:
Safford v. Redding (2009)
Citation: 557 U.S. 364 129 S. Ct. 2633; 174 L. Ed. 2d 354; 77 U.S.L.W. 4591; 245 Ed. Law Rep.
626; 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7974; 2009 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9383; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S
1011
Court Issuing the Opinion:
United States Supreme Court
Procedural History:
The school officials requested for summary judgment on basis that the respondent’s Fourth
Amendment protection was not violated. The Arizona District Court granted def...


Anonymous
This is great! Exactly what I wanted.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags