Description
Outline the process for the development of nursing standards of practice for your state, including discussion of the entities involved in developing the standards of practice and how the standards of practice influence the nursing process for your areas of specialty.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Excellent resource! Really helped me get the gist of things.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Guiding your Thinking
In 150 to 200 words Describe the primary point of view that you use to guide your thinking. What are the strengths and we ...
Guiding your Thinking
In 150 to 200 words Describe the primary point of view that you use to guide your thinking. What are the strengths and weaknesses of your view? In addition, describe a time when you, someone you know, or someone from a story you have seen experienced activated ignorance. What was the event, and how did that person display activated ignorance? Your explanations should have reasons that support them and that make use of the concepts in the textbook.
SPC College Living longer but Not Necessarily Living Better Paper
In the United States we have seen great progress in extending quantity/years to our lives. Longer life may present greater ...
SPC College Living longer but Not Necessarily Living Better Paper
In the United States we have seen great progress in extending quantity/years to our lives. Longer life may present greater opportunities for such things as increased time with family, more time to pursue hobbies or other activities, such as volunteerism or community activism, than was experienced by previous generations. However, the degree to which aging adults can experience these opportunities is often reduced due to health factors or disabilities. Many of these health and disability factors are the result of lifestyle, and not necessarily due solely to “aging”. Among the health threats are diabetes, arthritis, heart disease, falls, and Alzheimer’s disease, depression, and other mental health issues.
Thus, we have achieved great strides in lengthening our average years of life, but we lag behind in facilitating quality for those extended years. In other words, we have people living “longer”, but not necessarily living “better”. This scenario will have a major impact on our health care and human services systems in the U.S., especially as the Baby Boomers continue to enter their elder years. There are significant concerns that our systems are not equipped to respond to the needs of this population.
Assignment 3
In this assignment you will design, describe, and justify the method you will use in your Final Paper to generate and coll ...
Assignment 3
In this assignment you will design, describe, and justify the method you will use in your Final Paper to generate and collect data in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy or program you intend to evaluate. For guidance on the selection of the most logical, effective, and robust methodology, first look to the Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman (2004) text or the Lipsey, Petrie,Weisburd, and Gottfredson (2006) article for the fundamental explanations and uses of various methodologies. Then, utilize your research skills to locate additional appropriate scholarly sources that focus on criminal justice or related topics to develop a workable, logical methodology. The methodology should be suitable for inclusion in presentation designed for a criminal justice professional setting. To streamline the process, you can simply peruse the articles posted in the Required Resources and Recommended Resources sections throughout the course in order to obtain a more pragmatic, or practical, approach to the uses of scientific methodologies in the world of evaluation. This assignment can later serve as the methodology section in your Final Paper if you so choose, so make certain to include any term that will be included in the evaluation. For additional guidance on determining evaluability, look to your Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman (2004) text.In your paper,Define the terms that will be used in your Final Paper. (For example, if you plan to evaluate whether a given police department policy reduces crime, you must define what you mean by the term crime.)Operationalize your concepts and terms that will ultimately be used in your Final Paper.Describe what you will evaluate in your Final Paper.Describe how you will determine the evaluability and measure the effectiveness of the policy or program you are evaluating.Address the impact of any political or ethical issues that might be associated with your measures.The “Define the Concept and Create Measure” assignmentMust be 750 to 1250 words in length (not including title and reference pages), double-spaced, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Must include a separate title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
4 pages
Crime And Criminal Behavior
Inarguably, crime and criminal behaviour are two complex topics that are difficult to fully analyse and discuss given that ...
Crime And Criminal Behavior
Inarguably, crime and criminal behaviour are two complex topics that are difficult to fully analyse and discuss given that numerous variables revolve ...
Arizona State University Dashboards
Arizona State University began implementing dashboards in 2006 once
it realized that most staff members found the univer ...
Arizona State University Dashboards
Arizona State University began implementing dashboards in 2006 once
it realized that most staff members found the university's self-service
reporting system too difficult to use. The goal was to convert the most
widely used reports into dashboards and give everyone equal access to
information.Our dashboards are designed to give users 40 percent to 60 percent of
the information they need to do their jobs, regardless of the technical
resources in their department, says John Rome, director of development
and data warehousing at ASU.The first dashboard ASU built was a big success. It tracked research
proposals, awards, and expenditures by college, department, and
principal investigator every month. For the first time, the university
had a single source of truth about research dollars, a critical source
of funding for the university. Once the president began using the
dashboard, as described in the opening scenario, the deans, department
heads, and faculty did so as well. This was the tipping point for
dashboards, says Rome.Continue to research the work being done with data at Arizona State
University. In a 2-3 page APA formatted paper, describe in detail how
Arizona State sources and mines the data to create their dashboards.
What kind of information did the dashboards reveal and what could
Arizona State do with the results to improve things at the university?Be sure to use proper citations and references within your paper.
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Security Metrics Research Paper
Hello,Here are the instructions for this assignment:Make a list of at least ten information security metrics that could be ...
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Security Metrics Research Paper
Hello,Here are the instructions for this assignment:Make a list of at least ten information security metrics that could be collected for a small Internet commerce company with 10 employees. For this scenario, the company uses an outside vendor for packaging and distribution. Whom should the metrics be reported?MGMT 394 6.3 Hands-On RubricMGMT 394 6.3 Hands-On RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Development30.0 pts(Excellent - A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated.26.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated23.0 pts(Average - C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.20.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure30.0 pts(Excellent - A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product.26.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented.23.0 pts(Average - C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity.20.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis25.0 pts(Excellent - A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions.22.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed.19.0 pts(Average - C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear.17.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized.14.0 pts(Failing - F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat15.0 pts(Excellent - A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product.13.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product.11.0 pts(Average - C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product.9.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting.7.0 pts(Failing - F) Activity is not formatted at all.15.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0PreviousNext
Similar Content
BSU Hansel and Gretel Play Analysis Physicalization of Character by Hansel Essay
You will view the streaming performance of Hansel and Gretel adapted by Elena Velasco (yes) and Tori Bertocci, produced ...
Centralized Information Technology Department
Research a company that uses a Centralized Information Technology department. List the advantages and disadvantages of usi...
SAU Deep Learning and Cognitive Computing Artificial Intelligence Analytical Review
Topic: Deep Learning and Cognitive Computing (Attached text for Chapter 6)Questions: (Answer them in 200 words each)1. Wha...
Capella University Data structure for Software Development Discussion
Write 350 wordsWhat is the importance of algorithm analysis?Why is it important for both beginners as well as advanced pro...
Philosophy Essay
Phil 4
Take Home Final Exam
Clearly and concisely answer all of the following questions. Each answer
must use absolutely ...
5 Questions on Advanced Training Techniques at UPS
Objective: After the completion of this assignment, you will be able to describe the progressive methods and tools utilize...
Potential Entrepreneurial Venture
The potential entrepreneurial venture I have interest in and would probably consider to start in the future is a home insp...
Discussion Post 3
The National CLAS Standards are basically the fifteen action procedures meant to improve quality, advance health equity, a...
Assignmenet 2
1. What is the general purpose of the above speech? in one sentence? (2 Marks) To educate the audience on the impacts of s...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Guiding your Thinking
In 150 to 200 words Describe the primary point of view that you use to guide your thinking. What are the strengths and we ...
Guiding your Thinking
In 150 to 200 words Describe the primary point of view that you use to guide your thinking. What are the strengths and weaknesses of your view? In addition, describe a time when you, someone you know, or someone from a story you have seen experienced activated ignorance. What was the event, and how did that person display activated ignorance? Your explanations should have reasons that support them and that make use of the concepts in the textbook.
SPC College Living longer but Not Necessarily Living Better Paper
In the United States we have seen great progress in extending quantity/years to our lives. Longer life may present greater ...
SPC College Living longer but Not Necessarily Living Better Paper
In the United States we have seen great progress in extending quantity/years to our lives. Longer life may present greater opportunities for such things as increased time with family, more time to pursue hobbies or other activities, such as volunteerism or community activism, than was experienced by previous generations. However, the degree to which aging adults can experience these opportunities is often reduced due to health factors or disabilities. Many of these health and disability factors are the result of lifestyle, and not necessarily due solely to “aging”. Among the health threats are diabetes, arthritis, heart disease, falls, and Alzheimer’s disease, depression, and other mental health issues.
Thus, we have achieved great strides in lengthening our average years of life, but we lag behind in facilitating quality for those extended years. In other words, we have people living “longer”, but not necessarily living “better”. This scenario will have a major impact on our health care and human services systems in the U.S., especially as the Baby Boomers continue to enter their elder years. There are significant concerns that our systems are not equipped to respond to the needs of this population.
Assignment 3
In this assignment you will design, describe, and justify the method you will use in your Final Paper to generate and coll ...
Assignment 3
In this assignment you will design, describe, and justify the method you will use in your Final Paper to generate and collect data in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy or program you intend to evaluate. For guidance on the selection of the most logical, effective, and robust methodology, first look to the Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman (2004) text or the Lipsey, Petrie,Weisburd, and Gottfredson (2006) article for the fundamental explanations and uses of various methodologies. Then, utilize your research skills to locate additional appropriate scholarly sources that focus on criminal justice or related topics to develop a workable, logical methodology. The methodology should be suitable for inclusion in presentation designed for a criminal justice professional setting. To streamline the process, you can simply peruse the articles posted in the Required Resources and Recommended Resources sections throughout the course in order to obtain a more pragmatic, or practical, approach to the uses of scientific methodologies in the world of evaluation. This assignment can later serve as the methodology section in your Final Paper if you so choose, so make certain to include any term that will be included in the evaluation. For additional guidance on determining evaluability, look to your Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman (2004) text.In your paper,Define the terms that will be used in your Final Paper. (For example, if you plan to evaluate whether a given police department policy reduces crime, you must define what you mean by the term crime.)Operationalize your concepts and terms that will ultimately be used in your Final Paper.Describe what you will evaluate in your Final Paper.Describe how you will determine the evaluability and measure the effectiveness of the policy or program you are evaluating.Address the impact of any political or ethical issues that might be associated with your measures.The “Define the Concept and Create Measure” assignmentMust be 750 to 1250 words in length (not including title and reference pages), double-spaced, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Must include a separate title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
4 pages
Crime And Criminal Behavior
Inarguably, crime and criminal behaviour are two complex topics that are difficult to fully analyse and discuss given that ...
Crime And Criminal Behavior
Inarguably, crime and criminal behaviour are two complex topics that are difficult to fully analyse and discuss given that numerous variables revolve ...
Arizona State University Dashboards
Arizona State University began implementing dashboards in 2006 once
it realized that most staff members found the univer ...
Arizona State University Dashboards
Arizona State University began implementing dashboards in 2006 once
it realized that most staff members found the university's self-service
reporting system too difficult to use. The goal was to convert the most
widely used reports into dashboards and give everyone equal access to
information.Our dashboards are designed to give users 40 percent to 60 percent of
the information they need to do their jobs, regardless of the technical
resources in their department, says John Rome, director of development
and data warehousing at ASU.The first dashboard ASU built was a big success. It tracked research
proposals, awards, and expenditures by college, department, and
principal investigator every month. For the first time, the university
had a single source of truth about research dollars, a critical source
of funding for the university. Once the president began using the
dashboard, as described in the opening scenario, the deans, department
heads, and faculty did so as well. This was the tipping point for
dashboards, says Rome.Continue to research the work being done with data at Arizona State
University. In a 2-3 page APA formatted paper, describe in detail how
Arizona State sources and mines the data to create their dashboards.
What kind of information did the dashboards reveal and what could
Arizona State do with the results to improve things at the university?Be sure to use proper citations and references within your paper.
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Security Metrics Research Paper
Hello,Here are the instructions for this assignment:Make a list of at least ten information security metrics that could be ...
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Security Metrics Research Paper
Hello,Here are the instructions for this assignment:Make a list of at least ten information security metrics that could be collected for a small Internet commerce company with 10 employees. For this scenario, the company uses an outside vendor for packaging and distribution. Whom should the metrics be reported?MGMT 394 6.3 Hands-On RubricMGMT 394 6.3 Hands-On RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Development30.0 pts(Excellent - A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated.26.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated23.0 pts(Average - C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.20.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure30.0 pts(Excellent - A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product.26.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented.23.0 pts(Average - C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity.20.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis25.0 pts(Excellent - A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions.22.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed.19.0 pts(Average - C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear.17.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized.14.0 pts(Failing - F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat15.0 pts(Excellent - A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product.13.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product.11.0 pts(Average - C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product.9.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting.7.0 pts(Failing - F) Activity is not formatted at all.15.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0PreviousNext
Earn money selling
your Study Documents