Lateral Marketing Strategy

User Generated

zrj0010

Health Medical

Strategic Planning & Marketing in Health Care

Description

Please respond to the following: "Lateral Marketing Strategy"

  • Assess the value of target marketing as an effective health care marketing strategy. Appraise the degree to which vertical and traditional segmentation help marketing managers use target marketing strategies. Support your rationale with at least two (2) specific examples of target marketing within a health care organization with which you are familiar.
  • Evaluate the impact of lateral segmentation in encouraging marketing managers to look broadly at markets in order to identify previously overlooked opportunities. Provide at least one (1) specific example of quality initiatives within a health care organization.

MAX 450 Words

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CHAPTER 13 David Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum LEARNING OBJECTIVES After examining this chapter, readers will have the ability to: ■ Understand the importance of evaluating newly developed healthcare products in an effort to determine whether they will carry existing brand names or be assigned new ones. ■ Realize the tradeoffs associated with the use of brand extensions in the healthcare marketplace. ■ Appreciate the value of David Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum as a tool for formulating a variety of brand extension pathways. INTRODUCTION On an ongoing basis, healthcare marketers forward intensive efforts to develop the brands they are responsible for managing. Such concentrated attention to brand management responsibilities is to be expected because of the many benefits that successful brands afford to healthcare entities. Most notably, brands establish product identity, allowing customers to easily locate the goods and services of given organizations and differentiate them from competitive offerings. When healthcare marketers develop successful brands, they deliver valuable institutional assets that, if well managed, will yield enduring benefits for their associated healthcare organizations. Brand management initiatives are called upon for a variety of reasons, one of which is new product development. When new products are developed, healthcare marketers encounter numerous, related branding issues, with one of the most notable being the determination of whether new goods and services will carry existing brand names, termed brand extensions, or be assigned entirely new ones. Whether to field brand extensions or introduce new brands requires careful consideration. Brand extensions carry the benefit of familiarity in that target audiences already possess an awareness of associated brand names. This certainly affords advantages for new offerings in that the burden of building a base identity is significantly reduced and might even be outright eliminated depending on the strength of established brand names. Despite this powerful benefit, brand extensions are not always desirable. Brand portfolios can occasionally be overextended with too many products carrying given badges, resulting in confusion for both healthcare marketers and their customer populations. New product offerings also might not logically fit under existing brand names, warranting that such offerings carry newly developed identities. Significantly, brand extensions carry risks associated with the application of successful brand names to new and unproven product offerings. If these new products are not successful, such offerings will likely diminish the overall value of the brand names that they carry, negatively impacting all of the other product offerings in given brand portfolios. Regardless, the extension of established brand names to newly developed product offerings represents a practice worthy of consideration any time new goods and services present themselves. Interestingly, in the course of managing brands, healthcare marketers may discover logical additions to existing product arrays, resulting in various brand extensions. Hence, brand extensions can spur new product development even in the absence of formal initiatives to do so. For assistance whenever brand extensions are under consideration, healthcare marketers can turn to the Brand Stretch Spectrum, a tool developed by David Taylor. Illustrated in Figure 13-1, Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum identifies three paths for extending, or stretching, existing brands: the core range extension, the direct stretch extension, and the indirect stretch extension. Each of these paths presents opportunities for growth and expansion under the right circumstances, with risk increasing as extensions move further away from core product offerings. These three brand extension pathways, accompanied by examples in Figures 13-2 and 13-3, are explained as follows. FIGURE 13-1 Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum Adapted from Brand Stretch: Why 1 in 2 Extensions Fail and How to Beat the Odds by David Taylor. Copyright © 2004 by John Wiley & Sons Limited. Reproduced with permission. FIGURE 13-2 A Pharmaceutical Firm’s Brand Stretch Spectrum Constructed using design methodologies in Taylor, David. Brand Stretch: Why 1 in 2 Extensions Fail and How to Beat the Odds. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2004. FIGURE 13-3 A Medical Clinic’s Brand Stretch Spectrum Constructed using design methodologies in Taylor, David. Brand Stretch: Why 1 in 2 Extensions Fail and How to Beat the Odds. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2004. THE CORE RANGE EXTENSION The core range extension represents the application of a brand name to a new version (i.e., a product form variant) of an existing branded product. Because the brand is applied to a product with common core characteristics, such extensions are quite logical and reasonably safe pursuits. An extra-strength version of a branded aspirin product offered by a pharmaceutical manufacturer, for example, would represent a core range extension. So, too, would a newly established weekend medical clinic that carried the brand name of an existing weekday clinic. Yet another core range extension would be that of a deluxe wheelchair line offered by a durable medical equipment company that was placed under the same brand name as an existing wheelchair line possessing a standard array of features. Core range extensions are essentially equivalent product offerings, distinguished only by moderate feature and benefit differences. With such products, brand extensions make perfect sense because the given offerings are so closely related to each other. This affords excellent opportunities for newly developed goods and services to benefit from existing brand awareness in the marketplace. THE DIRECT STRETCH EXTENSION The direct stretch extension involves the application of an existing brand name to a broadened array of goods and services that differs from the core offering upon which the extension was based. This extension essentially stretches the brand name to cover items within a particular product class, which extends beyond the specific product form from which the brand name was derived. A pharmaceutical manufacturer that introduces cold and flu, allergy, and cough remedies under an existing brand associated with its array of aspirin products has effected a direct stretch extension. A medical clinic offering primary care services would, too, effect a direct stretch extension by placing a new specialty care clinic under its existing brand name. Likewise, a durable medical equipment company that introduces a new line of walkers, canes, and crutches under the brand name of its successful array of wheelchairs effects a direct stretch extension. Although direct stretch extensions differ from the core offerings that provided their associated brand identities, these extensions do fit into like product classes. Regardless, direct stretch extensions carry a greater degree of risk than core range extensions because the associated product offerings are different. This necessitates that healthcare marketers carefully evaluate direct stretch initiatives to ensure that these extensions represent appropriate applications for existing brand names. THE INDIRECT STRETCH EXTENSION The indirect stretch extension involves entry into a new product class. The degree of differentiation between the existing product class and the newly pursued one can range from mild to substantial. Because indirect stretch extensions branch out into unrelated product classes, they stretch brand names across a wide array of diverse product offerings, essentially creating umbrella brands. A pharmaceutical manufacturer exclusively focused on the pain relief product class would effect an indirect stretch extension by introducing a vitamin product under the brand name carried by its pain relief products. A medical clinic focused on the provision of comprehensive medical services in outpatient settings would effect an indirect stretch extension if the establishment decided to construct and operate a hospital or nursing home. A durable medical equipment company providing a comprehensive array of personal mobility products would effect an indirect stretch extension by introducing a new line of hospital beds under the brand name associated with its array of personal mobility products. Indirect stretch extensions pierce through the current product classes pursued by healthcare entities, placing them in new product classes containing goods and services that may be closely associated with, or very distant from, the goods and services offered in existing product classes. Clearly, indirect stretch extensions carry the highest level of risk associated with stretching brand names because established identities are being applied to product classes that are new and different. Given this, healthcare marketers must ensure that a goodness of fit exists between new product classes and existing brand identities because weak connections might possibly diminish existing brand equity. OPERATIONAL MATTERS Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum clearly identifies three potential paths for extending brand names to cover products that are increasingly distant from the core offerings upon which the associated brand names originated. Each of these extensions can be successfully effected under the right circumstances. As with any new product pursuit, extensions should carefully be evaluated to ensure that markets for given products exist and that the application of existing brand names to new offerings makes sense to both internal and external audiences. If these conditions are met, the brand extension route affords many opportunities for marketing success. If, however, new goods and services appear to possess great potential, but existing brand names do not seem to represent appropriate identities for these new offerings, the establishment of entirely new brand identities would likely yield better marketing results. Significantly, Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum can be used to spark new product ideas. By understanding the various pathways for stretching brands, healthcare marketers can review their existing product arrays and ask themselves how they might go about effecting core range, direct, and indirect stretch extensions. This activity can yield very productive new product insights even if formal systems for new product development do not exist. It is not uncommon for some of the best new product ideas to grow out of existing product offerings and, when this happens, the application of existing brand names to these new goods and services offers excellent opportunities to quickly connect with target audiences. SUMMARY David Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum provides healthcare marketers with a useful portrayal of potential paths for effecting brand extensions. Aside from its use as a tool for understanding such extensions, Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum can be used to foster new product development initiatives by encouraging healthcare marketers to envision how they might potentially extend their product arrays beyond core offerings. EXERCISES 1. Define and comprehensively discuss David Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum, providing insights into its guidance and use as a device for the extension of core brands. Preface your discussion by reflecting on the advantages and disadvantages associated with brand extensions. How would you characterize the prevalence of brand extensions in the healthcare industry? What is the basis of your characterization? 2. Select a healthcare good or service of your choice and assign the product an appropriate brand name. Using David Taylor’s Brand Stretch Spectrum, envision potential brand extensions to this hypothetical healthcare offering by formulating core range extensions, direct stretch extensions, and indirect stretch extensions. Provide an illustration of your Brand Stretch Spectrum and offer a narrative explaining your rationale for assembling the brand portfolio as you did. REFERENCE Taylor, David. 2004. Brand stretch: Why 1 in 2 extensions fail and how to beat the odds. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley. CHAPTER 14 The Market-Product Grid LEARNING OBJECTIVES After examining this chapter, readers will have the ability to: ■ Understand the three-step process of target marketing and its importance in the healthcare industry. ■ Realize the benefits afforded to healthcare entities as a result of target marketing practices. ■ Understand major segmentation variables upon which markets can be divided. ■ Recognize the value of the Market-Product Grid as an instrument for segmenting markets and targeting appropriate segments. INTRODUCTION In an effort to more effectively address the wants and needs of customers, marketers engage in target marketing, a practice that involves three interrelated activities: market segmentation, targeting, and product positioning. Market segmentation is the process of dividing a market into groups (i.e., segments) of individuals who share common characteristics. When the market has been segmented, marketers engage in targeting where they select (i.e., target) attractive segments and focus their efforts on satisfying the wants and needs of these groups. These targeted segments are known as an entity’s target market. Product positioning follows targeting and involves the determination of an appropriate and effective image for products to convey to customers. Target marketing developed out of desires to more appropriately address the various wants and needs of different customer groups. The practice stands in contrast to mass marketing, which involves offering products to the market as a whole without regard for individual tastes and preferences. Target marketing makes sense. Women of childbearing age, for example, have potential needs for labor and delivery services. Parents have needs, courtesy of their infants and young children, for pediatric medical services. Elderly individuals have needs for home health care, assisted living, and nursing home services. By focusing on the specific wants and needs of market segments, marketers can deliver goods and services that are specifically tailored for the associated groups. This practice not only improves customer satisfaction but also allows for better use of promotions resources through the selection of communications vehicles that precisely reach desired populations. A useful tool for target marketing is known as the Market-Product Grid, an instrument that specifically addresses the segmenting and targeting aspects of the practice. Illustrated in Figure 14-1, the MarketProduct Grid, as depicted by Roger Kerin, Eric Berkowitz, Steven Hartley, and William Rudelius, consists of a matrix with markets identified on its vertical axis and products identified on its horizontal axis. The actual number of cells in the matrix is, of course, dependent on the number of markets and products identified. As a result, Market-Product Grids range from being quite small for entities with few markets and few products to being very large for entities that offer multiple markets an extensive array of products. To create a Market-Product Grid, marketers simply (1) construct a matrix of sufficient size, (2) list potential markets on the vertical axis, (3) list product offerings on the horizontal axis, and (4) evaluate each of the resulting market-product combinations, characterizing them as large, medium, small, or nonexistent markets. The activity of listing the goods and services of entities on the Market-Product Grid is quite simple, but identifying and listing potential markets can be somewhat challenging without some point of reference. This point of reference can often be found by consulting a breakdown of segmentation variables, such as the one listed in Table 14-1. This table provides examples of specific segments that exist within each of the four major segmentation categories: geographic, demographic, psychographic, and behavioral. It, however, presents only a few of the almost endless market segments that marketers could potentially pursue. Such a table serves as a useful starting point for identifying markets for placement on the Market-Product Grid. FIGURE 14-1 The Market-Product Grid Adapted from Marketing, 7th ed. by Roger A. Kerin, Eric N. Berkowitz, Steven W. Hartley, and William Rudelius. Copyright © 2003, 2000, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1989, 1986 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Published by McGraw-Hill. Reproduced with permission of The McGraw-Hill Companies. Table 14-1 Major Segmentation Variables From Kotler, Philip; Armstrong, Gary, Principles of Marketing, 10th Edition, © 2004, Pg. 240. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. OPERATIONAL MATTERS Figure 14-2 illustrates a Market-Product Grid that was developed for a home health agency. Here, the agency used the grid to assess the market potential of different areas of Jackson County. The grid indicates that the south and central sections of Jackson County possess large markets, the east section possesses a medium market, and the north and west sections contain small markets. The grid clearly identifies the most prominent markets (i.e., the south and central regions) for home health services within the county—information that can greatly assist the agency in determining which markets it wishes to pursue. FIGURE 14-2 A Home Health Agency’s Market-Product Grid Constructed using design methodologies in Kerin, Roger A., Eric N. Berkowitz, Steven W. Hartley, and William Rudelius. Marketing. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003. Figure 14-3 presents a more complex Market-Product Grid that was developed for a sports medicine clinic. Here, the clinic sought to examine Washington County’s market potential for various sports medicine procedures by type of sport. The grid notably reveals a prominent market across all sports for foot and ankle procedures, followed closely by knee procedures. It also reveals that, among sports types, the tennis and golf sports populations possess the largest markets for broad sports medicine procedures—details that shed significant light on segment opportunities. FIGURE 14-3 A Sports Medicine Clinic’s Market-Product Grid Constructed using design methodologies in Kerin, Roger A., Eric N. Berkowitz, Steven W. Hartley, and William Rudelius. Marketing. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003. It should be noted that although the largest markets might seem to represent the most productive marketing pursuits, such markets are not always appropriate targets. Organizations must, for example, factor in marketplace competitors, their dominance in certain segments, and their overall numbers. Certain segments, although large, may be saturated with competitors or dominated by market leaders. In such situations, smaller markets with fewer competitors may be more desirable segments to pursue. Aside from competitive elements, healthcare organizations might select smaller markets based on the particular missions they embrace. Entities that cater to underserved , rural populations represent excellent examples of institutions engaging in this practice. It should also be noted that Market-Product Grids are only as accurate as the information that is used to complete them. Although they remain useful even with informally collected data, the use of data derived from formal market research can greatly improve their accuracy. SUMMARY The Market-Product Grid provides a simple, yet highly useful, method for segmenting and targeting markets. By using this tool, marketers can more precisely identify and target appropriate customer groups. The Market-Product Grid also ensures that marketers consider multiple market opportunities. EXERCISES 1. Define and comprehensively discuss the Market-Product Grid and its role as an instrument for segmenting markets and targeting appropriate segments. Preface your discussion by sharing insights regarding the value of target marketing in the healthcare industry. 2. Visit the Web site of an area healthcare institution and identify as many of its product offerings as possible. Based on your knowledge of your local region, identify potential markets for these products. With this information, construct a Market-Product Grid for the given healthcare entity, being sure to evaluate the resulting market-product combinations. Then, prepare a narrative describing the most appropriate targets based on your analysis. Are the targets you selected consistent with the perceived selections of the given health-care entity? Explain your rationale. REFERENCES Kerin, Roger A., Eric N. Berkowitz, Steven W. Hartley, and William Rudelius. 2003. Marketing. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Kotler, Philip, and Gary Armstrong. 2004. Principles of marketing. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. CHAPTER 15 Kotler & Trias de Bes’ Lateral Marketing Strategy LEARNING OBJECTIVES After examining this chapter, readers will have the ability to: ■ Appreciate the value of target marketing as an important healthcare marketing activity. ■ Understand the practice of vertical segmentation, the traditional approach to market segmentation, which involves identifying viable segments by drilling down into markets. ■ Understand the practice of lateral segmentation, a nontraditional approach to market segmentation, which encourages marketers to look broadly at markets to identify previously overlooked opportunities. ■ Appreciate the value of Kotler and Trias de Bes’ Lateral Marketing Strategy as an instrument, when used in tandem with traditional approaches, for realizing the true depth and breadth of marketplace opportunities. INTRODUCTION Target marketing—the three interrelated activities of market segmentation, targeting, and product positioning—represents one of the most important marketing practices. This practice essentially tailors products for specific market segments in an effort to encourage exchange. Clearly more productive than mass marketing, which involves marketing goods and services to broad markets without regard for individual tastes and preferences, target marketing places a defined emphasis on serving specific customer populations and represents a very common marketing practice. Despite the obvious benefits that the practice of target marketing affords to marketers and their customers, there are refinements that can be effected to improve the practice. One area of improvement concerns the first step of target marketing—market segmentation. Specifically, market segmentation is the process of dividing a market into groups (i.e., segments) of individuals who share common characteristics. Market segmentation is typically effected by drilling down into markets, bypassing layers that are deemed undesirable until desirable layers of associated markets have been identified. Appealing market segments are then targeted. This very common, drilldown orientation of market segmentation can be termed vertical segmentation. Vertical segmentation is clearly a viable method for segmenting markets, but as illustrated in Figure 151, the practice of drilling down into markets results in many missed opportunities. Such opportunities, although historically passed up, will become all the more important as the competitive intensity of the marketplace continues to increase and vertically defined segments become increasingly saturated. To assist marketers in improving their segmentation results by identifying missed opportunities, Philip Kotler and Fernando Trias de Bes formulated Lateral Marketing Strategy, a method for introducing lateral segmentation into the array of segmentation tools already possessed by marketers. Kotler and Trias de Bes developed Lateral Marketing Strategy to encourage marketers to look broadly at their markets in an attempt to identify opportunities to serve customer groups that have previously been overlooked, courtesy of the drill-down orientation of vertical marketing. The technique benefits marketers through the identification of valuable segments to pursue. Significantly, it also benefits customers whose wants and needs might otherwise go unnoticed. FIGURE 15-1 Vertical Segmentation & Missed Opportunities From Lateral Marketing: New Techniques for Finding Breakthrough Ideas by Philip Kotler and Fernando Trias de Bes. Copyright © 2003 by Philip Kotler and Fernando Trias de Bes. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. THE LATERAL MARKETING STRATEGY APPROACH Lateral Marketing Strategy essentially requires that healthcare marketers carefully examine their served market segments and the products that are used to address those segments. Specifically, healthcare marketers must endeavor to determine what market segment opportunities, if any, have been overlooked or bypassed over the course of serving current customer populations. Previously forgone segments are then evaluated to determine whether they are worthy of pursuit, with valuable segments becoming potential target markets. Consider an assisted living facility that has, as part of its product array, constructed a wellness center to serve its elderly population. The wellness center clearly provides benefits for its target market—the elderly residents of the facility—but in drilling down to this target population, what potential opportunities were overlooked? Depending on the capacity of the wellness center, opportunities for it to also serve as a fitness center for members of the community might be possible. The array of wellness center equipment, coupled with the skills of current employees, might also provide opportunities for the establishment of a physical therapy clinic. Each of these options—true departures from vertical segmentation initiatives—can potentially improve the revenues earned by the assisted living facility, illustrating the benefits offered by Lateral Marketing Strategy. As this example demonstrates, lateral segmentation initiatives require a degree of exploration and creativity on the part of healthcare marketers, but they afford a range of segmentation opportunities that might otherwise be neglected. Importantly, Kotler and Trias de Bes note that lateral segmentation is not a substitute for vertical segmentation. Instead, it is a complementary technique that increases the potential for the identification of productive market segments. When vertical and lateral segmentation approaches are combined, healthcare marketers significantly increase the range of growth opportunities at their disposal—an important benefit given the ever-increasing competitive intensity of the healthcare marketplace. SUMMARY Kotler and Trias de Bes’ Lateral Marketing Strategy provides healthcare marketers with an innovative method for broadly viewing segment opportunities in the marketplace. By adding lateral segmentation to their existing array of segmentation tools, healthcare marketers better position themselves and their organizations for enduring marketing success. EXERCISES 1. Define and discuss the vertical segmentation and lateral segmentation techniques and provide details regarding their respective deployment in the healthcare industry. Do you view Kotler and Trias de Bes’ Lateral Marketing Strategy as a technique that will compel healthcare marketing managers to reevaluate their segmentation practices? Explain your rationale. 2. Reflect on the various healthcare organizations in your local community and their respective targets. Can you identify any attractive opportunities that were possibly overlooked? If so, what are they? REFERENCE Kotler, Philip, and Fernando Trias de Bes. 2003. Lateral marketing: New techniques for finding breakthrough ideas. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. CHAPTER 16 Kim & Mauborgne’s Blue Ocean Strategy LEARNING OBJECTIVES After examining this chapter, readers will have the ability to: ■ Understand the increasingly saturated state of the healthcare marketplace, necessitating innovative efforts to locate target markets. ■ Realize the value of looking to both established and developing markets for market share growth opportunities. ■ Appreciate the value of Kim and Mauborgne’s Blue Ocean Strategy as a tool for guiding target marketing innovations. INTRODUCTION Healthcare marketers routinely endeavor to segment given markets, target desirable customer populations, and position their products in a manner that will be attractive to designated customer groups. These three interrelated activities—market segmentation, targeting, and product positioning— combine to form the essential and increasingly important practice known as target marketing. Now more than ever, to be successful at target marketing, healthcare marketers must be open-minded. This open-mindedness is required because the healthcare marketplace is becoming increasingly saturated with competitors, necessitating that healthcare marketers become innovative in their efforts to locate viable target audiences. One approach that can assist healthcare marketers in broadening their perspectives of the marketplace is known as Blue Ocean Strategy, a method for viewing markets that was developed by W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne. Blue Ocean Strategy encourages marketers to view their markets differently than they have in the past. This new approach stands in contrast to Red Ocean Strategy, the traditional approach to viewing markets, as illustrated in Figure 16-1. Specifically, Blue and Red Ocean Strategies are distinguished from each other by their different philosophies pertaining to five important attributes: market space, competition, demand, the value-cost tradeoff, and differentiation/low cost parameters. These attributes are explained as follows. MARKET SPACE Whereas Red Ocean Strategy focuses on competing in ever-saturated markets, Blue Ocean Strategy seeks to identify new markets for given product offerings. Blue Ocean Strategy is so termed as a reference to open, clear blue water in the ocean—a stark contrast to the bloody, red ocean water resulting from attacks of some sort—making it a useful analogy for uncontested market space. FIGURE 16-1 Red Ocean Strategy vs. Blue Ocean Strategy Reprinted by permission of Harvard Business School Press. From Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant by W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne. Boston, MA 2005, p. 18. Copyright © 2005 by the Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; all rights reserved. Smaller markets that have traditionally been overlooked in pursuit of larger ones represent potential blue oceans for healthcare entities. The same would be true of rare, but highly desirable, value-added practices like house calls offered by physicians or home delivery offered by retail pharmacies. As these examples illustrate, the discovery of blue oceans requires imagination, but when identified they afford uncontested market space ready to be acquired by innovative entities. COMPETITION Whereas Red Ocean Strategy seeks to battle competition within known markets, Blue Ocean Strategy seeks to pursue uncontested markets, thus avoiding direct competition. Successful market share pursuits into previously untapped markets, however, will likely draw competitors, which may ultimately turn blue oceans into red oceans. Therefore, healthcare marketers must ensure that they maintain the ability to compete in red oceans, regardless of the current fortunes offered by blue oceans. DEMAND Whereas Red Ocean Strategy exploits existing demand by engaging in market share battles within known markets, Blue Ocean Strategy involves the pursuit and capture of new demand by opening up new, previously untapped markets. In many established marketplaces, supply exceeds demand, creating the bloodiest of red oceans as competitors struggle for market share in an effort to remain viable. Such pressures do not exist in blue oceans, where potentially substantial, although untapped, demand may, in fact, exist. THE VALUE-COST TRADEOFF It has traditionally been accepted that products offering greater value carry higher costs, and vice versa—the domain of Red Ocean Strategy. Blue Ocean Strategy, instead, seeks to break the value-cost tradeoff by increasing value while reducing costs. This practice, termed value innovation, is accomplished by embedding enhanced customer-desired features into product offerings, while simultaneously reducing or eliminating elements that are not important to customers. Value innovation essentially provides customers with more for less. If a retail pharmacy, for example, discovered that its customers favored low cost prescription drugs and quick service over any other shopping concern, the given retailer could concentrate on reducing nonessential elements of the shopping experience. The resulting savings could then be used to offer the lowest priced prescription drugs and bolster expeditious service. Hence, greater value would be afforded to customers at reduced costs. DIFFERENTIATION/LOW COST PARAMETERS Closely related to the value-cost tradeoff issue is the differentiation/low cost matter. Whereas Red Ocean Strategy seeks to pursue either differentiation or low cost, Blue Ocean Strategy seeks to simultaneously pursue differentiation and low cost. A retail pharmacy, for example, seeking to offer the lowest priced prescription pharmaceuticals could provide home delivery for a modest fee, preserving low cost initiatives, while simultaneously offering a differentiated service. OPERATIONAL MATTERS Perhaps the most obvious aspect of practice related to Blue Ocean Strategy is that pursuit of such uncontested market space requires innovative thinking and deep investigation on the part of healthcare marketers. Identifying blue oceans is challenging but highly rewarding upon discovery of such opportunities. As markets become increasingly saturated with competitors, the viability of healthcare entities rests with the discovery of new opportunities for growth. Blue Ocean Strategy represents an approach for identifying and pursuing pathways to growth and prosperity. SUMMARY Blue Ocean Strategy serves to remind healthcare marketers that they must look beyond the traditional boundaries of established markets for opportunities to achieve growth and prosperity. Certainly, healthcare marketers must not neglect established markets, as many gains and even marketplace dominance can be achieved in such markets, but significant attention must also be directed toward the uncontested market space afforded by blue oceans. EXERCISES 1. Prepare a detailed essay comparing and contrasting Red Ocean Strategy and Blue Ocean Strategy. Based on your knowledge of healthcare establishments in your local market, do you perceive the entities to be competing primarily in red oceans, blue oceans, or both? Please justify your characterizations. 2. Select a healthcare entity in your local marketplace, choose a product offered by the entity, and study the associated target markets, characterizing them as either red oceans or blue oceans. What opportunities remain and are they red oceans or blue oceans? Report your findings in detail. REFERENCE Kim, W. Chan, and Renee Mauborgne. 2005. Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncon-tested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello, review the attached document and contact me in case you need any changes. Otherwise, good luck in your study and if you need any further help in your assignments, please let me know. Always invite me to answer your questions.

Running head: LATERAL MARKETING STRATEGY

Lateral Marketing Strategy
Institution Affiliation
Instructor’s Name
Student’s Name
Course Code
Date

1

LATERAL MARKETING STRATEGY

2

Lateral Marketing Strategy
Businesses that are focusing on growing their operations and sales in the market have to
adjust their marketing strategies. In today’s market, the strategies of marketing rely on vertical
market segmentation which can limit the possibilities of a higher...


Anonymous
Really useful study material!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags