(Research proposal introduction ) https://canvas.fscj.edu/courses/30602/pages/module...There are three parts to the research proposal that you are going to submit here in the Online Classroom: a topic proposal (two pages in length), a traditional outline of your topic (one page), and an annotated list of three potential resources (one page) that you might use in your larger research argument.Please upload a single, four-page document here in the Online Classroom before the submission deadline noted in the course calendar.Format RequirementsUse Times New Roman, 12-pt font for all of your workUse double spacing for the topic proposal and the annotated citations and single spacing for the outline.Include a running header (right justified) on each page with your last name and the page number.The document should include the following information in the upper left corner of the first page of the document:Student NameProfessor NameCourse NumberAssignment due dateTopic ProposalThe first two pages of this document should include your research proposal. Your work should address each of the following six areas listed below, and you need to include a word count inside a parenthesis at the conclusion of each section. Please follow the word-count guidelines listed for each section as follows:Summary (100–150 words)Purpose (50–100 words)Audience (50–100 words)Opening Statement, Thesis, or Hypothesis (50–100 words)Method, Materials, and Data (50–100 words)Expected Outcomes (50–100 words)OutlineThe third page of your proposal should include a traditional outline (Roman numerals, capital letters, numbers, and lower-case letters) that plots the course for your research paper. It is okay if this plan changes in the course of your writing process, but for now you are just illustrating forethought in planning your work.Annotated CitationsThe fourth and final pages of your proposal should include the alphabetized citations for three resources that you might use to support your research argument. Each citation should include as much publication information from the core elements of the MLA documentation style as you can identify as well as a written annotation of 2-3 sentences outlining the features of this particular resource.Please note that annotations are not required in the final draft of your research paper, which has a requirement of ten resources. This exercise is meant only to orient you to a common research practice that you are likely to encounter in future college classes. You can remove the annotations and paste the citations into your Works Cited page when you have finished the final draft or your research argument.

2.3 Discussion Forum #2: Navigating O'Brien's Truth Together1717 unread replies.2929 replies.Original POST due by Thursday, February 11, before 11:59 pmREPLIES and EDITS/REVISIONS due by Monday, February before 11:59 pmThis time, you must post before seeing your peers' posts.Part I: Review MLA In-Text Citation: The Basics (Links to an external site.)MLA Works Cited page (Links to an external site.)Works Cited Template (Links to an external site.)Sample Essay in MLA Format & Style .pdfCourse page for MLA Part II: Post (15 points) Please number each requirement.Articulate Tim O'Brien's overall philosophy/definition of truth and telling a true war story, and provide at least one quote using MLA in-text citation to support your discussion. Be sure to take his contradictions into account and not to oversimplify his text. You should also consider if his philosophy of truth is limited to telling war stories (approximately 75-100 words). How might it compare to your own?Explain one way in which O'Brien's story connects to the first chapter of your textbook "Argument: An Introduction" (2-17). Be specific and provide support from the assigned texts as needed. Do not use Figure 1.5. (approximately 75 words) Is O'Brien making an argument and/or truth-seeking? Is he attempting to persuade his readers of something? If so, where on the continuum does his text fall? (use Figure 1.5 in our textbook, page 11) Granted, he is writing a story and not a traditional essay, but we must not restrict our understanding of persuasion to nonfiction...(approximately 75-100 words) Be sure to fully develop your posts, illustrating close reading of O'Brien's powerful story and our textbook. In addition, careful proofreading is a must--no "i" for "I." Part III: Reply (10 points)Respond to posts 1-3 for two of your peers (5 points each). Begin by introducing yourself, and remember, replies that start with "I like" rarely stimulate good conversation. If you agree or disagree with your peer, be sure to explain why. If you think your peer's post is off-topic, help them to get back on track. As always, try to choose someone who has not yet received a reply, and let lease let our CREED (Compassion, Respect, Empathy, Empowerment, and Dignity) guide your engagement with your peers. O'Brien's text is powerful and there's much to consider. I look forward to reading your posts and replies!