writing a 4 pages paper about construction case

User Generated

Zrqb2020670

Writing

Description

I need to talk about the people who are controlling construction wastes(stakeholders).

- Talk about the dynamic of the system briefly.

- I need to talk about the stakeholders and how they are interacting together.

- where are they fit into the system.

- why are they (stakeholders) are participating in the construction wastes.

******* I do not need solutions for the issue at all.

I just need to talk and analyze the case.

AT least 10 sources.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

10/28/2018 Rubric Detail – 18FL-SCI-108-1 Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Name: 2. Revision plus Stakeholders Eco-Inno Exit Description: Rubric for Second Paper in Eco-Innovations Grid View List View Pro cient Competent Novice Poor Did Not Do Description of environmental problem informed by research and evidence (2,3,4) 20 (20%) 17 (17%) 14 (14%) 10 (10%) 0 (0%) Environmental problem described in terms of causes and consequences, with understanding informed by research and argument supported by evidence (10+ sources). As above but mechanisms weakly conveyed, argument is moderately supported by evidence (6+) As above, causes and consequences presented with little to no references to mechanisms or research Problem described in general or vague terms, arguments poorly sourced. Where stakeholders t into/ interact with system clear/ wellexplained (5,6,7) 10 (10%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7 (7%) 5 (5%) Each stakeholder is clearly related to some behavior of the system, with evidence to support description. Some but not all stakeholders are clearly related to some behavior of the system, with evidence to support argument. Stakeholders related to system behavior, but relationships are not explicit or supported by evidence E ects of the system on stakeholders is vague or unclear. Patterns of stakeholder behavior, interactions with systems stocks, ows, and variables clearly described (4,5,7) 20 (20%) 17 (17%) 14 (14%) 12 (12%) E ects of the stakeholder on the system and system on stakeholder clearly described and diagrammed. E ects of some but not all stakeholders on the system and vice versa are clearly described. Stakeholder behavior is related to the system behavior, but relationships are not explicit. E ects of the stakeholders on the system are vague or unclear. Clarity / comprehensibility of writing 10 (10%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7 (7%) 6 (6%) The writer’s decisions about focus, organization, style/tone, and content made comprehension easy for the reader throughout the paper. The writer has generally made good decisions about focus, organization, style/tone, and content to communicate clearly and e ectively. Individual passages, however, may be di cult to interpret. The writer’s decisions about focus, organization, style/tone, and/or content consistently interfere with clear, e ective communication The writer’s decisions about focus, organization, style/tone, and/or content interfere with communication to the extent that the purpose of the writing is not achieved 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) https://bblearn.philau.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_5160_1&course_id=_15668_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_5437_1&viewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_10870_1 1/2 10/28/2018 Rubric Detail – 18FL-SCI-108-1 Pro cient Competent Novice Poor Did Not Do 10 (10%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7 (7%) 6 (6%) 0 (0%) Writing ows smoothly from one idea to another. The writer has taken pains to assist the reader in following the logic of the ideas expressed Paragraphs with strong topic sentences. Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs is mostly clear, transitions between paragraphs mostly smooth. Logic of the paper is jumpy from topic to topic. Transitions largely absent. Paragraphs without strong topic sentences. Transitions between paragraphs and sections weak or absent. Overall structure confusing to reader. Quality (grammar, spelling, style, polish) 10 (10%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7 (7%) 6 (6%) All sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes no errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling. Most sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes a few errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling, but they do not interfere with understanding. Most sentences are well constructed, but they have a similar structure and/or length. The author makes several errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling that interfere with understanding. Sentences sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or are di cult to understand. The author makes numerous errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling that interfere with understanding. Research, citations, bibliography 10 (10%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7 (7%) 6 (6%) All parts of format or bibliography and citation format are followed consistently Errors in bibliography OR citations. Errors in bibliography AND citations. Consistent formatting errors in both bibliography and citations. Systems diagram structurally correct and corresponds with written description (5,6,7) 10 (10%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7 (7%) 6 (6%) Correct structure and a thorough presentation of the problem as presented in text Substantially correct and most elements and relationships explained Multiple errors, multiple relationships or elements not explained Insu cient explanation, more elements and relationships unexplained than explained, major errors in structure Logic, transitions, organization Name:2. Revision plus Stakeholders Eco-Inno 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Exit Description:Rubric for Second Paper in Eco-Innovations https://bblearn.philau.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_5160_1&course_id=_15668_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_5437_1&viewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_10870_1 2/2
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

RUNNING HEAD: STAKEHOLDERS IN WASTE MANAGEMENT

Stakeholders in Waste Management
Name:
Institution:

1

2

Stakeholders in Waste Management
Stakeholders' involvement in municipal waste management has been a success. There is
insufficient sanitation in most of the cities all over the world. Lower sanitation levels cause
diseases and eventually affects the economy (Wilson et al., 2015). The people who get affected
by the diseases fail to go for work, and they increase the cost of treatment. The sustainable waste
management puts in place a good outline of the inter-disciplinary framework that addresses the
challenges of controlling urban solid waste. It is done in developing countries where resources
are constrained. To improve the environmental quality of cities, strategies must be designed to
upgrade and construct sites for waste products. There are many environmental risks. Air and
water pollution has been affecting the environment for many years. The process of managing
these risks include tasks as explained. Management and waste cleanup. It includes cleaning the
contaminated sites. Also, treating and proper disposal of waste products are involved in the
process (Soos et al., 2015). The processes can also include reducing the toxicity of hazardous
wastes and gases. Maintaining air quality is vital in the process. It includes indoor and outdoor
air pollution. It also involves improving the quality and quantity of water. Enough supply of
clean water maintains a healthy environment. Managing natural resources is an essential factor.
It includes managing trees, minerals and wildlife. They can be conserved to use as consumptive
or non-consumptive recreation. There is the need to maintain critical natural areas like the
coastal regions and habitats for various species.
In managing waste, it requires the presence of a variety of stakeholders. The stakeholders
are those people who are responsible for causing environmental risks. Stakeholders are people
who might have caused ecological pollution, or they have to manage waste released into the
...


Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags