discussion question and peer review

User Generated

Zryvffvn17

Business Finance

Description

DISCUSSION POST MUST BE 10+ SENTENCES AND THE PEER REVIEW MUST BE 7+ SENTENCES PLEASE USE YOUR OWN WORDS AND DO NOT COPY FROM OTHER SITES STAY ON TOPIC ,BE POSITIVE , AND DO NOT COMMENT ON GRAMMAR ERRORS. TALK DIRECTLY TO CLASSMATES IN PEER REVIEWS!!!

1) DISCUSSION QUESTION

The video clip, “The Baloney Detection Kit,” this week discusses the ways an effective critical thinker assesses claims made by others.

  • Examine some key reasons why people might seem attracted to pseudoscience-type claims.
  • Describe at least two (2) such claims that you have heard people make and analyze the main reasons why such claims do or do not meet rigorous scientific methodology standards.
  • Determine at least two (2) ways in which the material discussed this week has changed your own thinking.
2) PEER REVIEW (JEFFERY)

Hello Professor and Classmates,

The two claims that I have heard people make is scientific racism and mythical creatures.

Scientific Racism: A belief that certain races are inferior to others. Racism occurs every day in the world we live in but, to be proven about inferiority is false. I believe that no race is superior to the next. We are all equal no what race you are. With racism, there has been an enormous amount of human and social damage.

Mythical Creatures-The belief that fairies, elves, pixies, and gnomes exist. These mythical creatures are creatures that people have read in fairy tale novels. If there are such creatures why at least one creature haven't been caught. With all fossils that have been discovered, there have not been at least that we can confirm that it is a mythical creature. We hear about bigfoot been caught on camera but who really knows if that is bigfoot are someone in a costume playing a prank.





FCGF3) PEER REVIEW (DIETRA)

Hello Class and Professor Erhart,

The video clip, “The Baloney Detection Kit,” this week discusses the ways an effective critical thinker assesses claims made by others.

Examine some key reasons why people might seem attracted to pseudoscience-type claims.

(Pseudoscience is everywhere – on the back of your shampoo bottle, on the ads that pop up in your Facebook feed, and most of all in the Daily Mail. Bold statements in multi-syllabic scientific jargon give the false impression that they’re supported by laboratory research and hard facts).

https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-netwo...

Some Key Reasons:

  • Real science can be difficult to understand.
  • It sounds awesome.
  • It sounds logical.
  • It makes them feel smart.
  • A celebrity believes in it.
  • A scientist endorses it.
  • The possibility it could be real.

http://thesoapboxrantings.blogspot.com/2013/08/11-...

Describe at least two (2) such claims that you have heard people make and analyze the main reasons why such claims do or do not meet rigorous scientific methodology standards.

1st Claim:

HeadOn – Apply Directly to Your Head:

A "medical" product known for its annoyingly commercial. Literally, the entire commercial. This was sold as a "homeopathic remedy", the product is a wax stick and the other ingredients are two types of poisonous flowers and a carcinogen, but don't be concerned; they are diluted to parts per trillion. You probably encounter higher doses of things sitting on your couch breathing.

“A good way to get attention is to not say what the product does. It touches on people’s curiosity. Curiosity is what sent me to the HeadOn website, and it no doubt sent millions of other people there, as well. If some percentage of those people are headache sufferers, and gullible, they might well be moved to buy some HeadOn.

If repetition within the ad is effective, why not extend this insight to repetition of the ad? Just keep airing it so often that it can’t be escaped and can’t be ignored. The ad is already generating tons of talk on the Web and has inspired a parody involving. It was everywhere.

Copy and paste the URL below into your browser to view the short commercial:

2nd Claim:

George Foreman Grill - Informercial

It was invented by Michael Boehm and marketed by George Foreman to great success.

George Foreman made $137.5 millionin cash and stock for use of his name in perpetuity. Add that to what he made before, and what he made after. Salton subsequently paid him at least $11 million more to make TV appearances and Foreman might have pulled in close to $200 million from a deal he wasn't that interested in to begin with.

http://visionlaunch.com/who-invented-the-george-fo...

Copy and paste the URL below into your browser to view the shore informercial:

Determine at least two (2) ways in which the material discussed this week has changed your own thinking.

1.Just because you see it television and a basketball player or celebrity is endorsing it does not make it real or that it works.

2. Do not try products that is not backed by science (a real Scientist that has completed scientific testing, etc.) or FDA approved (especially creams)



User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello, What's ...


Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags