Topic onProfit analysis :

User Generated

PuevfVfnnp

Business Finance

Description

Discuss the differences between a fee-for-service model and that of a capitated environment. Be sure to include specifics related to profit analysis of each model. Be sure to also discuss which model most closely reflects the goals related to health care reform, and why. 150 words

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Running Header: PROFIT ANALYSIS 1 Profit Analysis Institutional Affiliate Date PROFIT ANALYSIS 2 The differences between a fee-for-service (FFS) and capitation are many. To generalize I would say in fee-for-service doctors are usually paid according to the procedures they use to treat the patient while in capitation doctors are paid an agreed amount for each of the patients they attend to (Glazier, 2009). These two systems are widely used in the U.S. healthcare system though, in a capitated environment, physicians or healthcare service providers are paid a certain amount for each registered individual assigned to them. It can either be a single doctor or a group of physicians. The total fee is usually based on the average estimated health care a patient uses up. Other factors that affect how these fees are paid include race, age, sex, type of job one does, and one’s geographical location. In a capitated environment, increase in unit volume results in increase in costs and no increase in earnings (Glazier, 2009). In the fee-for-service model, payments are determined by charges for services provided. Neither the healthcare provider nor the companies paying for the service have any surety as to the total medical cost. Since there is a risk of overruns due to the extremely high number of people needing medical care the costs are usually assumed by the payer of which in most cases it is the insurance companies and not the healthcare provider. In fee-for-service the total revenue and profit increases with the increase in unit volume. The unit volume must be within the appropriate range but past the breakeven point. This makes the provider incentivized (Oleske, 1998). When talking about healthcare reforms I would recommend the use of both capitation and fee-for-service payments. In basic health care services, one should use capitation and fee-forservice payment should be used for less-required health care needs. This helps to reduce costs of PROFIT ANALYSIS 3 operation and be able to absorb the growing number of patients over the years. Capitation stimulates and increases output in preventive health care, while fee-for-service treatments enable cost analysis and alterations between doctors, service providers among others. Though capitation is still the most preferred due to the rise in costs of diagnostic procedures, lab tests, and medication that hinder profitability (Gosden, 2000). PROFIT ANALYSIS 4 Reference Glazier, R. H., Klein-Geltink, J., Kopp, A., & Sibley, L. M. (2009). Capitation and enhanced feefor-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(11), E72-E81. Oleske, D. M., Branca, M. L., Schmidt, J. B., Ferguson, R., & Linn, E. S. (1998). A comparison of capitated and fee-for-service Medicaid reimbursement methods on pregnancy outcomes. Health Services Research, 33(1), 55. Gosden, Toby, Frode Forland, Ivar Kristiansen, Matthew Sutton, Brenda Leese, Antonio Giuffrida, Michelle Sergison, and Lone Pedersen. "Capitation, salary, fee‐for‐service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians." The Cochrane Library (2000).
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

...


Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags