To participate in this discussion, you must view the film, The Great White Hoax-Donald Trump and the Politics of Race and Class in America (available here and in our Module) After viewing the above film, participate in our weekly discussion, answering the following questions: 1. Racial scapegoating: According to Wise, what role did fear and danger play in the appeals Donald Trump made to American voters? Which voters did he seem to be addressing his message to?2. Trumpism and Political Norms: What are some other examples of racial “dog-whistles” that white politicians have used with white audiences to communicatethat black and brown people are the source of their problems?3. Divide and Conquer Politics: Why does Wise say Donald Trump “functions like a walking, talking opioid”?4. Trumpism and White Cultural Anxiety: What is cultural anxiety and what role did it play in Trump’s victory ? 5. A Perfect Storm of White Male Anxiety: What was the reaction of most Trump supporters when he was caught on tape glamorizing and making light of sexual assault? What’s your own take on what these supporters had to say about this? 6. Learning from the Past: Why does Wise see reason for optimism despite rising levels of intolerance, racism, and white nationalism since Trump’selection?7. Provide substantial and constructive feedback to at least two classmates (no classmate feedback, no points awarded)

reading article and writing 2 pages essay summarising. Read "French Resistance - The Right to Self-Defense" by Charles de Gaulle and summarize the author's argument without context with the Toulmin Method and analyze his effectiveness in a 2-page paper.Remember, this is analysis of regular rhetorical strategies, so it will be very similar to the first 2-page paper on Benatar. My notes that I gave you on that one will be helpful to review in preparing for this one. Remember also that the point of this paper is analysis, not summary. Obviously summary is required, but only enough to then analyze what you've just summarized. As toward the format, you'll probably want an introductory paragraph with the author's name (Charles De Gaulle), the pamphlet's title ("The Right to Self-Defense"), the author's Main Claim (that the French have a right to defend themselves against their German occupiers), and whether or not you will find it effective.There should be about two or three body paragraphs, and these body paragraphs will look at two or three Reasonings the author has to support his Main Claim. Summarize the Reasonings, quote where you find them (and cite it), then analyze the effectiveness of the rhetorical strategies being used to make those Reasonings. Remember that it is not enough to simply claim that the strategies are effective or ineffective and then move on. You have to prove to me that the specific use of the rhetorical strategy you are analyzing is either effective or ineffective to the average reader. Your paper will be graded on your ability to convince your reader of the author's effectiveness or ineffectiveness (and your Grammatical correctness, obviously). For now, avoid any context on the reading or the author, as we'll add that later in another paper. Analyze the argument in a vacuum of context. (You'll like Charles de Gaulle, though. He's awesome.)You will also want a conclusion paragraph which adds no new information to your analysis, but rather summarizes your body paragraphs and restates your Main Claim about the author's effectiveness or ineffectiveness.You do not need a Works Cited for this paper, but you do need:At least 2 pages of writing.And standard MLA formatting, including an MLA introduction.Note: If you're rusty on how to analyze, see the Analysis Worksheet and review my notes on your first 2-page paper.