Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your faculty for review and approval. Part 1 Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources. Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your understanding of the problem: Leadership. Collaboration. Communication. Change management. Policy. Quality of care. Patient safety. Costs to the system and      individual. Technology. Care coordination. Community resources. Part 2 Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval. In a separate written deliverable, write a 5-7 page analysis of your intervention. Summarize the patient,      family, or population problem. Explain why you selected      this problem as the focus of your project. Explain why the problem is      relevant to your professional practice and to the patient, family, or      group. In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence. Define the role of      leadership and change management in addressing the problem. Explain how leadership and       change management strategies influenced the development of your proposed       intervention. Explain how nursing ethics       informed the development of your proposed intervention. Include a copy of the       intervention/solution/professional product. Propose strategies for      communicating and collaborating with the patient, family, or group to      improve outcomes associated with the problem. Identify the patient,       family, or group. Discuss the benefits of       gathering their input to improve care associated with the problem. Identify best-practice       strategies from the literature for effective communication and       collaboration to improve outcomes. Explain how state board      nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies      guided the development of your proposed intervention. Cite the standards and/or       policies that guided your work. Describe research that has       tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving       outcomes for this problem. Explain how your proposed      intervention will improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety, and      reduce costs to the system and individual. Cite evidence from the       literature that supports your conclusions. Identify relevant and       available sources of benchmark data on care quality, patient safety, and       costs to the system and individual. Explain how technology, care      coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in      addressing the problem.

Complete a Gemba Walk in your place of employment and document your observations. Refer to the SWOT analysis you conducted in Week Three to select the areas in need of improvement and narrow the list of places to conduct your Gemba Walk. While completing your walk, look for ways to eliminate inefficiencies, reduce waste, improve a product, or streamline a process.Because of the current stay-at-home orders in our COVID-19 health crisis, I will allow an alternative to ensure everyone's safety. Because of social-distancing orders, conducting a true Gemba Walk may not be possible. For some students they may be able to still conduct a Gemba walk and that is their choice. But for those who are not currently going to your place of employment every day, the alternative is to conduct an informal interview with someone who would have been involved in your Gemba walk if you had conducted one. You may interview informally via telephone, online chatting, however you see fit to gather information to write up in your paper using the headers below.Write a 3-page report (body text, doesn’t include references) on your observations of your Gemba. Include the following in your report (headers for each section):1) Include a summary of the organization (e.g., products or services, mission and vision)2) Provide context (where did you focus your Gemba on and why?)3) Discuss your Gemba observations:4) What was the goal of your Gemba?· Where did you go?· What did you observe?· Who did you observe?· Give a preliminary analysis of your observations.· List key takeaways.· List three short-term opportunities and one long-term opportunity to eliminate inefficiencies, reduce waste, improve a product, or streamline a process. (You will be working with 3 of these opportunities in your week 5 assignment)Cite any references that support your Gemba (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).

Find attached "second assessment" which the instructions talk about. This exercise HAS to be about what is discussed on the attached file. Thank youFor this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a culture of ownership and shared responsibility (Berkow et al., 2012). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.Demonstration of ProficiencyCompetency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.Communicate the interdisciplinary plan with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.ReferenceBerkow, S., Workman, J., Aronson, S., Stewart, J., Virkstis, K., & Kahn, M. (2012). Strengthening frontline nurse investment in organizational goals. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(3), 165–169.Professional ContextThis assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.ScenarioHaving reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee's organization.InstructionsFor this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.Additional RequirementsLength of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.