Students, please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment" in the Student Center.Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.Assignment 3: Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing IssuesDue Week 10 and worth 200 pointsBefore writing your position statement on Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues, you should read Chapters 1 through11 in your textbook. Then, research at least three (3) peer-reviewed articles about individual rights, morality, ethics, individual rights, duty, or codes of conduct for criminal justice professionals.Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:1. Create a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will balance the two issues in your own career in law enforcement.2. Determine a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Provide one to two (1-2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.3. Select a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Provide one to two (1-2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.4. Explain what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.5. Support your position statement with three (3) relevant and credible references, documented according to SWS. (Note: Do not use open source sites such as Ask.com, eHow.com, Answers.com, and Wikipedia.)Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. Include a cover page developed in accordance with SWS, including a running head, page number, the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page, revision of the previous assignment, and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Analyze the issues pertinent to codes of conduct and / or the ethics of duty. Recommend ways to use ethics to improve decision making in the criminal justice system. Analyze various philosophical approaches for ethical decision making, and the effectiveness and limits of each approach for making ethical choices. Analyze the ethical issues involved with balancing means and ends in the criminal justice field. Examine the key elements of virtue and character. Examine reasons for and effective ways to apply critical ethical thinking to criminal justice issues. Use technology and information resources to research issues in ethics and leadership in criminal justice. Write clearly and concisely about ethics and leadership in criminal justice using proper writing mechanics. Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution's policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates. Points: 200 Assignment 3: Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Create a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Did not submit or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Insufficiently created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Partially created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Satisfactorily created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Thoroughly created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. 2. Determine a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Did not complete or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Insufficiently determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Partially determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Satisfactorily determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Thoroughly determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. 3. Select a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Did not submit or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Insufficiently selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Partially selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Satisfactorily selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. Thoroughly selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career. 4. Explain what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals. Insufficiently explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals. Partially explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals. Satisfactorily explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals. Thoroughly explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals. 5. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

Please respond to the discussion below "see attachment." As always, your responses should be well-written, free of spelling or grammatical errors, properly edited, contain appropriate references for any works cited in your post, and should contain both facts of the case and your own thoughts relating to the matter and your answers to the questions.The attached ethics case is from the Southeast Regional Ethics Bowl, which was recently hosted at UCF. Please read the scenario and share your thoughts on whether there should or should not be a national beef tax. Please explain your position on this issue.Could be two paragraph for this discussion.