Write a summary detailing what the study was trying to find, how the study was conducted and what conclusions or results they obtained.

Economic quiz week 1  3 attempts to take test20 que

Teams who include more key issues (e.g., individuality, perception, communication, etc.), fully consider those issues, and show how the issues contribute to the outcomes of the case will receive more marks than those teams who include fewer issues, and/or don’t explain the issues, and/or don’t show how the issues are related. For example, in some analyses where perception is an issue that should be considered some teams simply use the word perception, but never describe the perceptual issues, nor do they show how they fit in with other issues discussed (i.e., integration). Other people have used the word perception and described the perception issues briefly, but have not shown how perception is a factor in the case. My suggestion is that if you deal with the issue of perception, describe the relevant perceptual issues, and show how perception is related to issues/problems in the case (this last connection is the integration issue). Please bear in mind that there is no magic number of issues, but there are some key issues that teams should deal with. Please use subheadings freely, but please remember to wrap up each section and indicate how the section is relevant to the problem and/or other elements. Please use transitions as you move on to the next sections.