Description
I have to read one page then write a paragraph about it. I will provide you with the reading page.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Cost of paying for organs
Name
Course
Institution
Date
1
Cost of paying for organs
Cost of paying for organs
Allowing payments for donated organs is more likely to result more expenses that might
af...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Very useful material for studying!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Gen499 Discussions Week 3 Discussion 2
Differences between a Scholarly Source and a Popular Source There are several differences between scholarly and popular so ...
Gen499 Discussions Week 3 Discussion 2
Differences between a Scholarly Source and a Popular Source There are several differences between scholarly and popular sources. A scholarly, ...
7 pages
Aspects Of Design Thinking
Design thinking has become a key tool for many companies in their effort to increase competency in the competitive market. ...
Aspects Of Design Thinking
Design thinking has become a key tool for many companies in their effort to increase competency in the competitive market. It is a problem solving ...
PROJ586 Phoenix XYZ Cruise Lines Risk Management Case Study Discussion
CASE STUDY:There was a company (XYZ Cruise Lines) in the vacation industry that had a reservations system for their cruise ...
PROJ586 Phoenix XYZ Cruise Lines Risk Management Case Study Discussion
CASE STUDY:There was a company (XYZ Cruise Lines) in the vacation industry that had a reservations system for their cruise operations that was designed for agents to book cruise passengers for individual bookings within five to seven minutes. This system created a competitive advantage among travel agents as they can book their clients fast from the start of the process to the payment screen. Their largest competitor had a reservation system that took approximately 15 minutes, which was a clear competitive advantage for XYZ Cruise Lines. However, the competitor had an automated process to check in customers at the pier and provided for an electronic boarding pass where the passengers would carry an identification card with a magnetic strip to allow for faster embarkation of the ship at the pier and at the ports of call. XYZ Cruise Lines was still utilizing a manual system for embarkation and utilized paper-boarding passes. Since customers tend to remember any bad experiences with the beginning (embarkation process) and the end (disembarkation process) of the trip more than during the trip, the embarkation process has caused a lot of dissatisfaction especially among those passengers who sailed with the competitor in the past. In an effort to improve the process, XYZ Cruise Lines a state-of-the=art Ship Embarkation System was being developed. This new planned system will allow the passengers to be processed faster for the embarkation process and a plastic card with a magnetic strip will be activated and utilized as the electronic boarding pass. Additionally, this same card will also be utilized as the Point of Sale purchase card creating a cashless process for the passengers to buy drinks and other extras on board the ship during the voyage. This will further XYZ as the completive leader in the industry.This new system will have to communicate with the current reservations system via satellite connectivity. This software development project had four main components: (a) Ship Embarkation System, (b) Point of Sale System (POS), (c) Satellite Technology Utility for connectivity from the HQ's Reservations System to the Ship, and (d) Upgrade to the existing Reservations System to generate the upload to the Ship's Embarkation and POS systems. All components were completed by December 1st and was ready for the integration testing process so that the project can be implemented on December 15th just before the start of the busy season at which time further software project implementations are not permitted for six months due to the heavy volume impacting the Reservations System.When it came time for the integration testing, the upgrade for the Reservations System could not be made for the test environment because the upgrade was not moved to the Quality Control environment and the software changes was still in the programmer's work file. No other developer or anyone in IT management had access to these files. The programmer that had worked on these changes had a heart attack and was in the hospital. As a result, the Project Manager informed everyone that they were going to miss the deadline and now had to wait six more months before this project could be implemented and the Business Sponsor was furious.The Quality Assurance Manager asked the reason for the missed deadline and when she heard the story, she asked the IT Project Manager for the Risk Management Plan. He said that they do not believe in planning for risk events because this was a negative process and they support a positive approach towards the systems development process. Since there was not a risk matrix created and the risk for the developer to have a heart attack was not considered, the project was delayed and the company lost an opportunity to improve their competitive advantage, which equaled to millions of dollars in potential future bookings.After reading the Quality Assurance Manager's report, Senior Management asked the following questions:What does PMI recommend about Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk?Explain why a project manager or any stakeholder should not view risk planning for projects as a negative activity?Did the organization follow due diligence regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assess all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks? Explain your rationale. Should this risk event in this case been identified in the beginning? Why or why not?What are some contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events such as a key team member leaving for any reason?What would be your recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case?ASSIGNMENT:Management is upset that there is an occurrence of a major risk that could affect the project is a large fashion. Your job is to prepare a 5 to 8 minute presentation, using PowerPoint Presentation with your recorded voice that which addresses the five questions posed by Senior Management and reflects your research and thorough analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of the case. You will need to set the voice playback (sound) and the slide transitions to automatic in PowerPoint. You may wish to convert the presentation to a MP4 video.Submit either the PowerPoint presentation with automatic slide transitions and sound playback, or the converted video.Reminder!use at least two scholarly resources to validate your presentation and present all resources in a slide or frame near the end of your presentation. This listing should be in APA format.SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT SUMMARY:The case study will involve a process-orientated assignment consisting of reviewing the case, analyzing the data provided in the case and transforming the issues into a practical solution (Processes). The data presented in the case will be collected, analyzed and synthesized. (Data). After analyzing and synthesizing the data, the student will use a Microphone to create narration for a slide presentation via PowerPoint with automatic transitions, Movie Maker, PowerPoint Video Tool, or other such presentation/video tools available to the student. Either the PowerPoint or resulting MP4 video will be embedded to a discussion thread for asynchronous discussion activity (Devices). Finally, a peer review of this activity will be performed following the submission of the presentation, providing an integral network of outsiders analyzing and evaluating the solution provided (People).RUBRICLMA: PROJ586.WK5.RubricLMA: PROJ586.WK5.RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk Management Planning (PMI)Addresses what PMI recommends about Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk by applying it to the case.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent presents completely the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk. Additionally, these recommendations are fully compared, contrasted, and synthesized to the actual case analyzed.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent presents completely the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk. Additionally, these recommendations are somewhat compared, contrasted, and synthesized to the actual case analyzed.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent presents completely the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk. However, these recommendations are not compared, contrasted, and synthesized to the actual case analyzed.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent does not fully present the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableStudent does not address what PMI recommends about Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk by applying it to the case.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk Planning as Positive ActivityAdequately explains why a project manager or any stakeholder should not view risk planning for projects as a negative activity.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent effectively present an appraisal and argument fully supporting that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent presents an appraisal and argument mostly supporting that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent presents an appraisal and argument somewhat supporting that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent provides limited support that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableAn appraisal and argument supporting proactive risk management are not evident.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDue DiligenceAnalyzed and synthesized the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assess all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent fully analyzed and synthesized the case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student presents several issues in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent mostly analyzed and synthesized the case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student presents a few issues in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent somewhat analyzed and synthesized the case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student presents only one possible issue in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent present limited case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student does not present any possible issue in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableStudent did not present any analysis of the case facts regarding due diligence.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContingency PlansPresenting contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent completely and adequately explains at least three contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent completely and adequately explains at least two contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent completely and adequately explains only one contingency plan or action that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent only presents a limited recommendation for such projects in the future based upon this case.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableStudent does not present any possible plan or action or recommendation.20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKCL.PROJ586.CO-D.Risk-Managementview longer descriptionthreshold: 3.0 pts4.0 ptsExcellent: Clear and consistent focus on purpose and audience. Develops a strong central idea and demonstrates effective identification, analysis, assessment, and evaluation of potential risks. Additionally, the student presents contingency and/or mitigation for those risks with the greatest impact and/or probability of occurrence. The distinctive voice of the writers emerges through superior command of language. Sources are used, if required, to support and develop concepts and ideas, and are properly cited (in-text) and documented (reference page or works cited). Exhibits stylistic variety and energy. Essentially free from mechanical errors.3.0 ptsCompetent: Generally engaged with purpose and audience. Central idea addresses the topic but is vaguely realized in places regarding the demonstration of effective identification, analysis, assessment, and evaluation of potential risks. Additionally, the student generally presents contingency and/or mitigation for those risks with the greatest impact and/or probability of occurrence. Generally well organized, with adequate support in the process of developing precedence relationships among activities, a network diagram and critical path, and schedule. However, there are some misplaced details or logical inconsistencies. The writers’ voice is apparent but occasionally inconsistent. Demonstrates competent use of language and a workable style. Mechanical errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.2.0 ptsFair: Partially aware of purpose and audience. Development of central idea produces some distortion or may neglect significant issues regarding the demonstration of effective identification, analysis, assessment, and evaluation of potential risks. The student somewhat presents contingency and/or mitigation for some of the risks with the greatest impact and/or probability of occurrence. The plan of organization is undermined by omission of ideas and details, and illogical or simplistic reasoning in the process of developing precedence relationships among activities, a network diagram and critical path, and schedule. Sources, if required, are used, but with frequent or pervasive inconsistencies in support and/or format. The writers’ voice is weakly developed and use of language may be vague, imprecise, or awkward. Style is repetitive or plodding. Mechanical errors sometimes interfere with meaning.1.0 ptsPoor: The writer seem unaware of purpose, audience, or organization. There is little evidence of a controlling idea. The writers fail to respond to the situation or explore the issues. The writers’ voice is not recognizable due to inadequate control of language. Style is undeveloped. Sources are required, but are not used thus ideas require support or sources are not cited or correctly documented throughout. Excessive grammatical and mechanical errors block meaning.0.0 ptsUnacceptable: The presentation does not meet the standards.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarrationPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that is well structured and organized with voice narration.8.0 to >6.9 ptsExcellentPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that includes voice narrations where the voice automatically plays with automatic transitions of slides or frames, along with being structured well and very organized with virtually no errors made.6.9 to >4.9 ptsCompetentPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that includes voice narrations where the voice automatically plays with automatic transitions of slides or frames, along with being structured and organized with some minor errors made.4.9 to >3.9 ptsFairPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that includes voice narrations but the voice does not automatically play with automatic transitions of slides or frames, along with being structured and organized with some minor errors made. Either the slides are not automatic or the voice is not automatic, or both.3.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorPowerPoint or Video Presentation does not include any voice narration but still can be view self-sufficient without voice narration; or the voice narration exists but there are several errors or the presentation is poorly organized and structured.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe presentation does not meet the standards.8.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Resources and APAThe presentation includes at least two scholarly resources to validate the presentation and presented all resources in a slide or frame near the end of the presentation. This listing should be in APA format.8.0 to >6.9 ptsExcellentThis presentation includes a reference listing with at least two scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references are listed near the end of the slide presentation and is in proper APA format.6.9 to >4.9 ptsCompetentThis presentation includes a reference listing with at least two scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references is not in proper APA format and/or not located at the end of the presentation.4.9 to >3.9 ptsFairThis presentation includes a reference listing with at least one scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references The listing of references may not in proper APA format and/or not located at the end of the presentation.3.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorThis presentation includes a reference listing the references do not reflect scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references is may not in proper APA format and/or not located at the end of the presentation.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThere is not any reference listing.8.0 pts
Colgate-Palmolive Case analysis and Marketing Mix, marketing homework help
***Instructions: Please answer the following questions with a minimum of 200-word count for each question, total of 800-wo ...
Colgate-Palmolive Case analysis and Marketing Mix, marketing homework help
***Instructions: Please answer the following questions with a minimum of 200-word count for each question, total of 800-word count or more. A cover page/title page is not needed. Use scholarly articles to support your answer, include in-text citations and a reference page, APA format. Please use the reference that I provided in the attached file, here is the reference: Solomon, M. R., Marshall, G. W., & Stuart, E. W. (2012). Marketing: Real people, real choices. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Also, 2 outside scholarly articles for in-text citation and references are required. Do not use Wikipedia, ask.com, online dictionaries, or etc. No PLAGIARISM and let me know if you have any questions or concerns!Read the Chapter 1 Case: Real Choices at Colgate-Palmolive (page 37 of pdf., last page on the attached file)1. Summarize the case and identify the dilemma facing Colgate-Palmolive.2. Research the product at www.colgatewisp.com. Discuss each element of the marketing mix for Wisp. (use this website for in-text citation and reference page)*note* Marketing Mix elements:•Product (or Service) includes packaging design, branding, trademarks, warranties, guarantees, product life cycles and new product development•Price setting profitable and justifiable prices•Place (Distribution) Channels your product will go through to reach the customer•Promotion (Advertising, Sales Promotion, Publicity, Personal Selling)- (New) Positioning is where you place your product in the mind of the consumer.- (New) People are those who create, produce, and then market the product- (New) Packaging creation, design of packaging (related to product/promotion)3. A key to long-term business success lies in a firm’s ability to offer value to customers through its product offerings. Identify and discuss the key sources of value at Colgate-Palmolive. How might these value-adding properties be communicated to customers?4. What decision(s) do you recommend to Colgate-Palmolive? Discuss specific implementation tactics supporting your recommendation. Within the discussion identify the target market, market segment(s) and the competitive advantage.
CMN 6060 Duke University Mediation Process Research Paper
Read the attached information.Assume the first role, that of Samantha (Sam) Pinder, Executive V.P. of Finance, a mediator/ ...
CMN 6060 Duke University Mediation Process Research Paper
Read the attached information.Assume the first role, that of Samantha (Sam) Pinder, Executive V.P. of Finance, a mediator/facilitator. Two other roles are also printed out to assist you in understanding how the parties view the dispute.Resolve this dispute using the Steps in the Mediation Process and the Mediator's guide which follows the role information.Detail what takes place at each step. In the end, describe the outcome for all parties.The length of the paper should be approximately 5-7 pages, double-spaced and in 12 point type using Microsoft Word.You may have up to ten days to submit this assignment. Note the due date of Wednesday, October 21. This is the last assignment/roleplay of the term. There will be a Discussion Board in week 6, but no other written assignment.
Similar Content
Harvard University Leadership and Professional Development Discussion
Hey guys, I have so much to do and I am super overwhelmed. Please help me out!Your Task:Part 1: Read and reflect on the ...
BUSI 2033 Yorkville University Week 6 Organizational Culture Gusto 54 Discussion
...
Montclair State University Forensic Accounting Multiple Choice Questions
Please make sure that you aware with forensic accountant. Questions could be answered in Word Document that i provided. Yo...
UC Week 4 Total Quality Management Problem Statement Research Paper
Week 4: Create a "Problem Statement" Assignment - Here is my topic The Role of Managerial Accountants and the Implementati...
BCO 315 Geneva Cost of Equity Market Value & Commitment Agreement Questions
part 1 (20 points)
We claim that the goal of the rm is to maximize current market value. Could the...
Cloud Profitability, business and finance assignment help
In a one- to two-page paper (250-500 words), discuss whether or not there are cost benefits to cloud computing using
spec...
R957 Cultural Consideration .edited 1
The main aim of every business is to expand its market and remain competitive in the market. However, to remain competitiv...
Tourism Question
1- What is the purpose of the chaud-froid mirror? To act as a background during the decoration process. It also protects t...
Hal.edited
What are the central facts of the case and the assumptions you are making based on these The central facts of the case are...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
4 pages
Gen499 Discussions Week 3 Discussion 2
Differences between a Scholarly Source and a Popular Source There are several differences between scholarly and popular so ...
Gen499 Discussions Week 3 Discussion 2
Differences between a Scholarly Source and a Popular Source There are several differences between scholarly and popular sources. A scholarly, ...
7 pages
Aspects Of Design Thinking
Design thinking has become a key tool for many companies in their effort to increase competency in the competitive market. ...
Aspects Of Design Thinking
Design thinking has become a key tool for many companies in their effort to increase competency in the competitive market. It is a problem solving ...
PROJ586 Phoenix XYZ Cruise Lines Risk Management Case Study Discussion
CASE STUDY:There was a company (XYZ Cruise Lines) in the vacation industry that had a reservations system for their cruise ...
PROJ586 Phoenix XYZ Cruise Lines Risk Management Case Study Discussion
CASE STUDY:There was a company (XYZ Cruise Lines) in the vacation industry that had a reservations system for their cruise operations that was designed for agents to book cruise passengers for individual bookings within five to seven minutes. This system created a competitive advantage among travel agents as they can book their clients fast from the start of the process to the payment screen. Their largest competitor had a reservation system that took approximately 15 minutes, which was a clear competitive advantage for XYZ Cruise Lines. However, the competitor had an automated process to check in customers at the pier and provided for an electronic boarding pass where the passengers would carry an identification card with a magnetic strip to allow for faster embarkation of the ship at the pier and at the ports of call. XYZ Cruise Lines was still utilizing a manual system for embarkation and utilized paper-boarding passes. Since customers tend to remember any bad experiences with the beginning (embarkation process) and the end (disembarkation process) of the trip more than during the trip, the embarkation process has caused a lot of dissatisfaction especially among those passengers who sailed with the competitor in the past. In an effort to improve the process, XYZ Cruise Lines a state-of-the=art Ship Embarkation System was being developed. This new planned system will allow the passengers to be processed faster for the embarkation process and a plastic card with a magnetic strip will be activated and utilized as the electronic boarding pass. Additionally, this same card will also be utilized as the Point of Sale purchase card creating a cashless process for the passengers to buy drinks and other extras on board the ship during the voyage. This will further XYZ as the completive leader in the industry.This new system will have to communicate with the current reservations system via satellite connectivity. This software development project had four main components: (a) Ship Embarkation System, (b) Point of Sale System (POS), (c) Satellite Technology Utility for connectivity from the HQ's Reservations System to the Ship, and (d) Upgrade to the existing Reservations System to generate the upload to the Ship's Embarkation and POS systems. All components were completed by December 1st and was ready for the integration testing process so that the project can be implemented on December 15th just before the start of the busy season at which time further software project implementations are not permitted for six months due to the heavy volume impacting the Reservations System.When it came time for the integration testing, the upgrade for the Reservations System could not be made for the test environment because the upgrade was not moved to the Quality Control environment and the software changes was still in the programmer's work file. No other developer or anyone in IT management had access to these files. The programmer that had worked on these changes had a heart attack and was in the hospital. As a result, the Project Manager informed everyone that they were going to miss the deadline and now had to wait six more months before this project could be implemented and the Business Sponsor was furious.The Quality Assurance Manager asked the reason for the missed deadline and when she heard the story, she asked the IT Project Manager for the Risk Management Plan. He said that they do not believe in planning for risk events because this was a negative process and they support a positive approach towards the systems development process. Since there was not a risk matrix created and the risk for the developer to have a heart attack was not considered, the project was delayed and the company lost an opportunity to improve their competitive advantage, which equaled to millions of dollars in potential future bookings.After reading the Quality Assurance Manager's report, Senior Management asked the following questions:What does PMI recommend about Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk?Explain why a project manager or any stakeholder should not view risk planning for projects as a negative activity?Did the organization follow due diligence regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assess all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks? Explain your rationale. Should this risk event in this case been identified in the beginning? Why or why not?What are some contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events such as a key team member leaving for any reason?What would be your recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case?ASSIGNMENT:Management is upset that there is an occurrence of a major risk that could affect the project is a large fashion. Your job is to prepare a 5 to 8 minute presentation, using PowerPoint Presentation with your recorded voice that which addresses the five questions posed by Senior Management and reflects your research and thorough analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of the case. You will need to set the voice playback (sound) and the slide transitions to automatic in PowerPoint. You may wish to convert the presentation to a MP4 video.Submit either the PowerPoint presentation with automatic slide transitions and sound playback, or the converted video.Reminder!use at least two scholarly resources to validate your presentation and present all resources in a slide or frame near the end of your presentation. This listing should be in APA format.SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT SUMMARY:The case study will involve a process-orientated assignment consisting of reviewing the case, analyzing the data provided in the case and transforming the issues into a practical solution (Processes). The data presented in the case will be collected, analyzed and synthesized. (Data). After analyzing and synthesizing the data, the student will use a Microphone to create narration for a slide presentation via PowerPoint with automatic transitions, Movie Maker, PowerPoint Video Tool, or other such presentation/video tools available to the student. Either the PowerPoint or resulting MP4 video will be embedded to a discussion thread for asynchronous discussion activity (Devices). Finally, a peer review of this activity will be performed following the submission of the presentation, providing an integral network of outsiders analyzing and evaluating the solution provided (People).RUBRICLMA: PROJ586.WK5.RubricLMA: PROJ586.WK5.RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk Management Planning (PMI)Addresses what PMI recommends about Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk by applying it to the case.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent presents completely the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk. Additionally, these recommendations are fully compared, contrasted, and synthesized to the actual case analyzed.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent presents completely the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk. Additionally, these recommendations are somewhat compared, contrasted, and synthesized to the actual case analyzed.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent presents completely the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk. However, these recommendations are not compared, contrasted, and synthesized to the actual case analyzed.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent does not fully present the recommendations of PMI regarding Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableStudent does not address what PMI recommends about Risk Management Planning, Monitoring Risk, and Controlling Risk by applying it to the case.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk Planning as Positive ActivityAdequately explains why a project manager or any stakeholder should not view risk planning for projects as a negative activity.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent effectively present an appraisal and argument fully supporting that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent presents an appraisal and argument mostly supporting that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent presents an appraisal and argument somewhat supporting that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent provides limited support that project risk management is necessary in an effort focused on being proactive, rather than merely reactive, and use risk management to both drive competitive advantage and sustain the ability to complete the planned project.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableAn appraisal and argument supporting proactive risk management are not evident.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDue DiligenceAnalyzed and synthesized the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assess all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent fully analyzed and synthesized the case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student presents several issues in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent mostly analyzed and synthesized the case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student presents a few issues in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent somewhat analyzed and synthesized the case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student presents only one possible issue in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent present limited case facts with respect to the due diligence process regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assessing all major risks, and developing appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring and controlling risks. The student does not present any possible issue in the case where due diligence was not completed by the organization in the case.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableStudent did not present any analysis of the case facts regarding due diligence.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContingency PlansPresenting contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.20.0 to >17.9 ptsExcellentStudent completely and adequately explains at least three contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.17.9 to >13.9 ptsCompetentStudent completely and adequately explains at least two contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.13.9 to >7.9 ptsFairStudent completely and adequately explains only one contingency plan or action that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, while presenting some appropriate recommendations for such projects in the future based upon this case.7.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorStudent only presents a limited recommendation for such projects in the future based upon this case.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableStudent does not present any possible plan or action or recommendation.20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKCL.PROJ586.CO-D.Risk-Managementview longer descriptionthreshold: 3.0 pts4.0 ptsExcellent: Clear and consistent focus on purpose and audience. Develops a strong central idea and demonstrates effective identification, analysis, assessment, and evaluation of potential risks. Additionally, the student presents contingency and/or mitigation for those risks with the greatest impact and/or probability of occurrence. The distinctive voice of the writers emerges through superior command of language. Sources are used, if required, to support and develop concepts and ideas, and are properly cited (in-text) and documented (reference page or works cited). Exhibits stylistic variety and energy. Essentially free from mechanical errors.3.0 ptsCompetent: Generally engaged with purpose and audience. Central idea addresses the topic but is vaguely realized in places regarding the demonstration of effective identification, analysis, assessment, and evaluation of potential risks. Additionally, the student generally presents contingency and/or mitigation for those risks with the greatest impact and/or probability of occurrence. Generally well organized, with adequate support in the process of developing precedence relationships among activities, a network diagram and critical path, and schedule. However, there are some misplaced details or logical inconsistencies. The writers’ voice is apparent but occasionally inconsistent. Demonstrates competent use of language and a workable style. Mechanical errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.2.0 ptsFair: Partially aware of purpose and audience. Development of central idea produces some distortion or may neglect significant issues regarding the demonstration of effective identification, analysis, assessment, and evaluation of potential risks. The student somewhat presents contingency and/or mitigation for some of the risks with the greatest impact and/or probability of occurrence. The plan of organization is undermined by omission of ideas and details, and illogical or simplistic reasoning in the process of developing precedence relationships among activities, a network diagram and critical path, and schedule. Sources, if required, are used, but with frequent or pervasive inconsistencies in support and/or format. The writers’ voice is weakly developed and use of language may be vague, imprecise, or awkward. Style is repetitive or plodding. Mechanical errors sometimes interfere with meaning.1.0 ptsPoor: The writer seem unaware of purpose, audience, or organization. There is little evidence of a controlling idea. The writers fail to respond to the situation or explore the issues. The writers’ voice is not recognizable due to inadequate control of language. Style is undeveloped. Sources are required, but are not used thus ideas require support or sources are not cited or correctly documented throughout. Excessive grammatical and mechanical errors block meaning.0.0 ptsUnacceptable: The presentation does not meet the standards.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarrationPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that is well structured and organized with voice narration.8.0 to >6.9 ptsExcellentPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that includes voice narrations where the voice automatically plays with automatic transitions of slides or frames, along with being structured well and very organized with virtually no errors made.6.9 to >4.9 ptsCompetentPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that includes voice narrations where the voice automatically plays with automatic transitions of slides or frames, along with being structured and organized with some minor errors made.4.9 to >3.9 ptsFairPowerPoint or Video Presentation created that includes voice narrations but the voice does not automatically play with automatic transitions of slides or frames, along with being structured and organized with some minor errors made. Either the slides are not automatic or the voice is not automatic, or both.3.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorPowerPoint or Video Presentation does not include any voice narration but still can be view self-sufficient without voice narration; or the voice narration exists but there are several errors or the presentation is poorly organized and structured.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe presentation does not meet the standards.8.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Resources and APAThe presentation includes at least two scholarly resources to validate the presentation and presented all resources in a slide or frame near the end of the presentation. This listing should be in APA format.8.0 to >6.9 ptsExcellentThis presentation includes a reference listing with at least two scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references are listed near the end of the slide presentation and is in proper APA format.6.9 to >4.9 ptsCompetentThis presentation includes a reference listing with at least two scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references is not in proper APA format and/or not located at the end of the presentation.4.9 to >3.9 ptsFairThis presentation includes a reference listing with at least one scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references The listing of references may not in proper APA format and/or not located at the end of the presentation.3.9 to >0.9 ptsPoorThis presentation includes a reference listing the references do not reflect scholarly resources that is peered reviewed and not from the textbook. The listing of references is may not in proper APA format and/or not located at the end of the presentation.0.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThere is not any reference listing.8.0 pts
Colgate-Palmolive Case analysis and Marketing Mix, marketing homework help
***Instructions: Please answer the following questions with a minimum of 200-word count for each question, total of 800-wo ...
Colgate-Palmolive Case analysis and Marketing Mix, marketing homework help
***Instructions: Please answer the following questions with a minimum of 200-word count for each question, total of 800-word count or more. A cover page/title page is not needed. Use scholarly articles to support your answer, include in-text citations and a reference page, APA format. Please use the reference that I provided in the attached file, here is the reference: Solomon, M. R., Marshall, G. W., & Stuart, E. W. (2012). Marketing: Real people, real choices. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Also, 2 outside scholarly articles for in-text citation and references are required. Do not use Wikipedia, ask.com, online dictionaries, or etc. No PLAGIARISM and let me know if you have any questions or concerns!Read the Chapter 1 Case: Real Choices at Colgate-Palmolive (page 37 of pdf., last page on the attached file)1. Summarize the case and identify the dilemma facing Colgate-Palmolive.2. Research the product at www.colgatewisp.com. Discuss each element of the marketing mix for Wisp. (use this website for in-text citation and reference page)*note* Marketing Mix elements:•Product (or Service) includes packaging design, branding, trademarks, warranties, guarantees, product life cycles and new product development•Price setting profitable and justifiable prices•Place (Distribution) Channels your product will go through to reach the customer•Promotion (Advertising, Sales Promotion, Publicity, Personal Selling)- (New) Positioning is where you place your product in the mind of the consumer.- (New) People are those who create, produce, and then market the product- (New) Packaging creation, design of packaging (related to product/promotion)3. A key to long-term business success lies in a firm’s ability to offer value to customers through its product offerings. Identify and discuss the key sources of value at Colgate-Palmolive. How might these value-adding properties be communicated to customers?4. What decision(s) do you recommend to Colgate-Palmolive? Discuss specific implementation tactics supporting your recommendation. Within the discussion identify the target market, market segment(s) and the competitive advantage.
CMN 6060 Duke University Mediation Process Research Paper
Read the attached information.Assume the first role, that of Samantha (Sam) Pinder, Executive V.P. of Finance, a mediator/ ...
CMN 6060 Duke University Mediation Process Research Paper
Read the attached information.Assume the first role, that of Samantha (Sam) Pinder, Executive V.P. of Finance, a mediator/facilitator. Two other roles are also printed out to assist you in understanding how the parties view the dispute.Resolve this dispute using the Steps in the Mediation Process and the Mediator's guide which follows the role information.Detail what takes place at each step. In the end, describe the outcome for all parties.The length of the paper should be approximately 5-7 pages, double-spaced and in 12 point type using Microsoft Word.You may have up to ten days to submit this assignment. Note the due date of Wednesday, October 21. This is the last assignment/roleplay of the term. There will be a Discussion Board in week 6, but no other written assignment.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents