(Elite Burger: New Product Launch)

User Generated

gntyvsr08

Writing

Description

Please read the case scenario (Elite Burger: New Product Launch) included in the Module Five Case Scenario Guidelines and Rubric document.

After reading the case scenario, address the following:

  • What are three other risks that the project manager should have identified and planned for? You can draw on the course material, your experience, and research to answer this question.
  • Describe some mitigation techniques that the project manager could use to alleviate those risks. You can draw on the course material, your experience, and research to answer this question.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

QSO 340 Module Five Case Scenario Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For this discussion, you will review the short case scenario (Elite Burger: New Product Launch) and describe some of the risks that may be encountered during the project. In addition, you will discuss some of the mitigation techniques the project manager could use to minimize those risks. Elite Burger: New Product Launch Case Scenario David Smith, a project manager at Elite Burger, was called into an executive meeting on short notice. During the meeting, the executive team discussed a new burger that will be launched in 6 months called the “Big Time Burger”. Since David has successfully launched other products in the past, he was tasked with being the project manager for this new project. After the meeting with executives, David scheduled a meeting with his team to discuss the project. During the meeting, David expressed some of his concerns, such as the fact that upper management has a history of significantly revising the scope at various points throughout the project. In addition, the new burger ingredients are rare and in limited supply, which may cause complications. Unfortunately, the meeting had to be cut short and David tasked his team with identifying additional risks that should be considered and accounted for. Prompt: After reading the case scenario, address the following:   What are three other risks that the project manager should have identified and planned for? You can draw on the course material, your experience, and research to answer this question. Describe some mitigation techniques that the project manager could use to alleviate those risks. You can draw on the course material, your experience, and research to answer this question. For your response, you can draw on the course material, your experience, and research. In your responses to your peers, address the following:   Do you agree with their assessment of the additional risks the project manager should identify and account for? Why or why not? Summarize how these types of risks can be mitigated in your present profession or outside of work. Requirements for Discussion Topic Assignments Students are required to post one (1) initial post and to follow up with at least two (2) response posts for each discussion topic assignment. For your initial post (1), you must do the following:  Compose a post of one to two paragraphs. Complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Take into consideration material such as course content and other discussion topics from the current module and previous modules, when appropriate  Use proper APA citation methods when referencing scholarly or popular resources. For your response posts (2), you must do the following:  Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post thread. Complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating that “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in the prompt above. Rubric Critical Elements Risk identification Exemplary Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides an in-depth, detailed explanation (100%) Proficient Develops an initial post that clearly identifies and explains additional risks of the project (85%) Mitigation Techniques Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides creative, insightful recommendations (100%) Feedback on Risk Identification Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides nuanced, detailed feedback (100%) Develops an initial post that effectively explains appropriate mitigation techniques based on identified project risks (85%) Constructively critiques the risks identified in peers’ original posts (85%) Examples of Risk Mitigation Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides rich, detailed, or creative examples (100%) Clearly summarizes in response posts how risks can be mitigated in real-world situations (85%) Needs Improvement Develops an initial post that identifies and explains additional risks of the project, but response is incomplete or lacking in detail (55%) Develops an initial post that explains mitigation techniques, but the explanation is superficial or incomplete (55%) Constructively critiques the risks identified in peers’ original posts, but response lacks depth or details (55%) Summarizes in responses posts how risks can be mitigated in real-world situations, but the summary is incomplete or lacks authenticity (55%) Not Evident Does not develop an initial post that identifies and explains additional risks of the project (0%) Value 25 Does not develop an initial post that explains appropriate mitigation techniques based on identified project risks (0%) Does not constructively critique the risks identified in peers’ original posts (0%) 25 Does not summarize in response posts how risks can be mitigated in real-world situations (0%) 15 15 Timeliness Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization (100%) Submits initial post on time (100%) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%) Submits initial post one day late (55%) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%) Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%) Total 10 10 100%
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

I appreciate working with you! In case of any further edits, please do not hesitate to let me know! See you soon! Remember me as always! Would love and appreciate to work with you in the future! Goodbye

Running head: RISKS IN ELITE BURGER NEW PRODUCT LAUNCH

RISKS IN ELITE BURGER NEW PRODUCT LAUNCH
(Author’s name)
(Institutional Affiliation)

1

RISKS IN ELITE BURGER NEW PRODUCT LAUNCH

2

Risks in Elite Burger New Product Launch
Recent studies have established th...


Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags