Theory and Culture Worksheet
User Generated
Nyvpwn17
Humanities
Description
Sociologists use theoretical perspectives to interpret social behavior and phenomena. Culture can be used to do the same, but it also provides other predictable elements. This assignment examines theoretical perspectives and the role of culture in sociology.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
SOC/100 v7
Theory and Culture Worksheet
Short-Answer
Respond to the following in 50 to 75 words each, unless otherwise specified.
1. What is sociology? What are some examples of what sociologists study?
2. When examining the theoretical perspectives in sociology, each perspective has a specific focus
and level of analysis. What does the level of analysis mean?
3. In 25 to 50 words each, describe the focus and level of analysis for the following theoretical
perspectives:
a. Symbolic Interactionalism:
b. Functional Analysis:
c.
Conflict Theory:
4. Culture shapes many things in our lives, including what we wear, what we eat, and how we
interact with each other. What are the influences of culture in society?
Copyright© 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
3 pages
For Student 26
For this activity we will be talking about some of the ideas expressed in James Paul Gee's "Literacy, Discourse, and Lingu ...
For Student 26
For this activity we will be talking about some of the ideas expressed in James Paul Gee's "Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics" from Writing About ...
HUM 101 Glendale Community College Ethical Studies Discussion
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involv ...
HUM 101 Glendale Community College Ethical Studies Discussion
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.In responses to at least two peers, check their work. Were their explanations and examples clear and accurate? Identify any problems/errors in their logic or explain why you agree with their rationale. Make sure your responses are substantive and contribute extra to the discussion.Example of this:so, let's consider a hypothetical situation...You've got an acquaintance at West Coast. Not a close friend, but someone you've taken classes with before. And in those classes, this person has generally done as well or better than you. They're a responsible, capable student. But one term, this student disappears for a few weeks at the end of the term. You see them right before you go into take your final exam, and the student says they had to leave the country to care for a sick relative. They asked the professor for an extension, but the professor refused, and now they're totally unprepared for the final and about to fail the class. Except there's a quirk in the testing room. From this student's seat, they can look up at the light fixtures and see a reflection of your desk a few rows away. So, they can copy off your exam with no chance of you getting caught (just accept this as part of the hypothetical). Why the student told you this before cheating, I'm not sure, but now you know their plan. So...what's the right thing to do? Let them copy? Report to the professor? Just move seats (if you do, someone else will sit in your seat and they'll probably copy off of them)? Now, here's the important part. It's not your answer that we're after this week. It's your reasons. The big values that you used to arrive at the specific judgment about this case. For example, you might make the following argument:P: It will help them a lot if they passP: Nobody will get in any troubleC: It's good to let them copyThat's an example of a Consequentialist argument. Your focused on the outcomes of the decision. Specifically, it's a Utilitarian argument, because the big principle required to make that argument work is the premise: the right action is the one that creates that maximized happiness for all involved. But you could arrive at the same conclusion for entirely different reasons. You might say something like this:P: To report the person is to snitchP: You have a duty never to snitchC: You should let them copy or switch seatsThis argument isn't really about outcomes anymore. It invokes a duty - a moral rule that must be followed no matter what. That's a Deontological approach. Obviously, I think there are logical problems with both of those arguments! In the first case, I think there may well be people harmed by cheating, especially if we consider what would happen if everyone did it. In the second, is the duty not to snitch really one you can apply consistently? Would you not report a car theft or a murder? And if your "no snitch" duty only applies some of the time, how do you decide when?So, read up on the different moral perspectives in the book. The prompt mentions four, but there are more! Then, talk about which ones make the most (or event the least) sense to you and try to apply them to some hypotheticals. I look forward to hearing your ideas ;)
EDPD 8044 WU A Plan for Culturally Responsive Advocacy Leadership Essay
research various perspectives of a multicultural education issue and develop an advocacy plan to effectively communicate a ...
EDPD 8044 WU A Plan for Culturally Responsive Advocacy Leadership Essay
research various perspectives of a multicultural education issue and develop an advocacy plan to effectively communicate and advocate for a culturally responsive solution. During the development of your advocacy plan, synthesize and reflect on the major learning points that are applicable to leading culturally responsive social change in your context. To prepare for this Assignment, review the issues you identified in the Equity Audit assignment. The link below is my equity audit assignment: https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn...Review Chapters 1–5 (pp. 1–64) of “An Introduction to Advocacy: Training Guide.” the link below is the intro to advocacy training guide: https://class.content.laureate.net/26ba4b2a7487808f9d5ab43c929aff9e.pdfinstructions:https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn...please let me know if you are unable to open any of the links
PSY211 Stratford University Week 9 Ending Life Early Discussion
Week 9: Jul 23Discussion E (answer question & write two replies)Discussion EDiscussion E: Ending Life Early1. Please read ...
PSY211 Stratford University Week 9 Ending Life Early Discussion
Week 9: Jul 23Discussion E (answer question & write two replies)Discussion EDiscussion E: Ending Life Early1. Please read and watch the following: Euthanasia from Module 11 and watch the following clip of Play Video. The links are provided below. You can copy and paste them into your web browser. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/lifespandevelopment2/chapter/euthanasia/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzp0tp8Fzio ;2. Initial Post (300 words) What are your reactions to Brittany's choice? Should this practice be legal? Imagine if you were Brittany's loved one. How would you respond? Would you support her decision or try to change her mind?Task 9: Please read the Introduction to Death and Dying, The Most Common Causes of Death, The Process of Dying,and 5 Stages of Loss Please read Palliative Care and Hospice and Bereavement and Grief. Please respond to the following questions: 1. Have you ever had to cope with the loss of a loved one? If so, what concepts described in this section provide context that may help you understand your experience and process of grieving? (If you have not experienced the loss of a loved one, which concepts do you think would provide context?)2. If were you were diagnosed with a terminal illness would you choose hospice care or a traditional death in a hospital? Why?Lesson 9: Answer these questions: What are the top three causes of deaths in the United States? What are Kuble-Ross's 5 Stages Loss?
PGCC Psychology Josie An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness Discussion
Part 1: Read: Read the four case studies provided this week. They are included in the Week 6 Learning Resources. Links ...
PGCC Psychology Josie An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness Discussion
Part 1: Read: Read the four case studies provided this week. They are included in the Week 6 Learning Resources. Links to access the case studies are included below as well. Part 2: Main Post: In order to express our mastery of professional psychology’s prerequisite knowledge, skills, and abilities, this week we will exchange responses to diversely different case studies. Select the case study you would like to analyze and discuss. Read the case study carefully and compose your responses to the assigned questions, provided below. Your responses should reflect your unique, personal, response to the case addressed. Once you have crafted your analysis and written your answers, post your answers here as your main post. - - - -- CASES Study 1: Josie: An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness Josie: An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness by Joan-Beth Gow. Susan M. Nava, and Kerri W. Augusto. Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Originally published July 30, 2011. https://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/files/josie.pdf This case study is divided into 6 parts. After each part there is a series of questions. Jot down your initial impressions after each part. At the conclusion of your reading, answer the following questions. Post your answers and discuss the case with your classmates. Questions (Required): Answer these three questions. 1. Outline for the class a brief history of this case. 2. Discuss the presenting problem addressing your early and concluding assessment of the problem. That is, in the beginning did you think Josie was physically or mentally ill? How or why did your thoughts change? 3. What kind of treatment strategy would you recommend? Mention theoretical perspectives, or interventions/techniques and prognosis. Questions (Pick Two): Select. then answer two of the following questions. 4. Do you think Josie's behavior or appearance influenced the care she received? Why? How did this impact her case? 5. What questions still remain? What other information would help you more accurately assess what Josie is experiencing? 6. With respect to the general public, how has the treatment of the mentally ill changed over time? 7. Do you think medical professionals are sufficiently trained to differentiate medical from psychological illness? Why or why not? Can you give us an example of another illness which presents as a psychological concern but is chemically based? Study 2: Artificial Sanity Artificial Sanity by Sheila O’Brien Quinn. Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Originally published June 23, 2005. https://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/files/artificial_sanity.pdf Questions: Answer five of the following questions. 1. Discuss two accepted models of mental illness, i.e., psychological, biological, behavioral. What assumptions are made within the models? How do they differ? 2. How do these two different models influence the treatment of people with mental disorders? 3. Tell the class the history of the present case. What does "right to treatment" entail for Singleton? Does Singleton have schizophrenia, in your opinion? 4. What are the assumptions about mental illness held by Singleton's lawyer and the prosecutor? Support your answer with direct quotes from each lawyer. 5. Each lawyer appears to believe in a different model of mental illness. What model is each lawyer using to support his/her argument about how Singleton should be treated? 6. What is artificial sanity? Argue your personal side of the case. Study 3: Sins of the Mother ID Crimefeed (2017, October 25). A look back at Susan Smith – the South Carolina mom killed her two young sons. (Webpage) Read the attached article. Then answer at least 4 of the following questions. http://www.investigationdiscovery.com/crimefeed/crime-history/a-look-back-at-the-susan-smith-case-23-years-after-the-south-carolina-mom-killed-her-2-young-sons Questions: Answer five of the following questions. Susan violated what most people consider our most sacred trust when she killed her children. How could she have done it? Develop a profile of a woman who might kill her own children. Online, find the FBI’s profile of women who kill their own children. Compare your profile with the FBI’s profile.Discuss potential effects that sexual abuse can have on a young woman. How might Susan’s experiences with her stepfather have affected her behavior?Discuss possible pressures on a young couple that marries in their teens, especially under the circumstances of David and Susan’s marriage.Identify nonverbal cues that Susan gave. Discuss how it is possible to tell if someone if lying from nonverbal behavior. What information does the use of the polygraph supply?Speculate on why Susan might have done what she did. Include speculations about her marriage as well as her own childhood and adolescence.Susan wanted relief from loneliness and the problems in her life. She wanted to commit suicide but did not want her sons to suffer as she had after her father’s suicide. She believed that if she killed her sons first and then committed suicide, her sons would suffer less than if she left them on their own. She felt burdened and was overwhelmed by the responsibilities of being a single mother. What role might depression have played in her actions?Classify Susan according to the DSM V?Why didn’t her attorneys use the mental illness defense? Study 4: Nature or Nurture: The Case of a Boy Who Became a Girl Nature or Nurture: The Case of the Boy Who Became a Girl by Keith K. Schillo. Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Originally published November 16, 2011. https://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/files/gender_reassignment.pdf Questions: Answer five of the following questions. 1. Some people have argued that the Johns Hopkins psychologist used this opportunity as an experiment to test his nurture theory of gender identity. What are the expected results of this experiment, assuming that the nurture theory is valid? 2. According to the nurture theory, predict the gender identity Bruce would express if he were not subjected to gender re-assignment surgery and raised as a boy? 3. Provide one peer-reviewed article, selected from our UMGC Library’s databases, that address current research or theory on gender identity. 4. In light of newer research on gender identity, what advice would you give parents who are considering gender re-assignment of a male infant who lacks a penis, but has functional testicles? 5. What are your thoughts on therapist behavior. What guidelines and codes of ethics direct therapists managing cases of this nature?
4 pages
Africa As A Dark Continent 1
1. How does the history of West African kingdoms undermine the idea of sub-Saharan According to Thompsell (2019), most tra ...
Africa As A Dark Continent 1
1. How does the history of West African kingdoms undermine the idea of sub-Saharan According to Thompsell (2019), most travelers largely perceived ...
Similar Content
4 page leadership essay
FOLLOW ALL DIRECTIONS FROM THE PICTURES!!!IMAG0187.jpg IMAG0188.jpg IMAG0189.jpg ...
Texas Woman's University Modern Prohibition Era Discussion
Many people have said history tends to repeat itself, while others believe that we learn from the mistakes of the past. Af...
Respond to two questions bellow
RESPOND WITH ONLY ONE PARAGRAH EACH QUESTION In what ways is Christianity similar to and different from other religions?Wh...
Disscusion Board
Did the American opinion of President Richard Nixon directly impact perspectives on the U.S. military's role in the Vietna...
Family Law Discussion 1
You are a new family law paralegal in a small family law firm. As you prepare to assist with the initial client interview,...
We’re late. The meeting _____________________ by the time we get there. Answers
We’re late. The meeting _____________________ by the time we get there.Answers A - will already be...
History - Willem de Kooning
I chose to compare and contrast the painting Untitled XX1 by Willem de Kooning and Estate by Robert Rauschenberg. Each art...
Organizational Behaviorr 1 1
The management of groups in a business setting can be challenging. To be able to handle the management in such a way that ...
Written Assignment 4 Creating And Assessing Essay Questions
Essay questions have a long history in classroom assessments, and they have faced a wide array of controversies over the y...
Related Tags
Book Guides
2001 A Space Odyssey
by Arthur Clarke
The Restless Wave
by John McCain
Cat on a Hot Tin Roof
by Tennessee Williams
A Farewell To Arms
by Ernest Hemingway
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
by Stephen R. Covey
Herzog
by Saul Bellow
Uncle Tom's Cabin
by Harriet Beecher Stowe
The Fault in Our Stars
by John Green
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
3 pages
For Student 26
For this activity we will be talking about some of the ideas expressed in James Paul Gee's "Literacy, Discourse, and Lingu ...
For Student 26
For this activity we will be talking about some of the ideas expressed in James Paul Gee's "Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics" from Writing About ...
HUM 101 Glendale Community College Ethical Studies Discussion
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involv ...
HUM 101 Glendale Community College Ethical Studies Discussion
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.In responses to at least two peers, check their work. Were their explanations and examples clear and accurate? Identify any problems/errors in their logic or explain why you agree with their rationale. Make sure your responses are substantive and contribute extra to the discussion.Example of this:so, let's consider a hypothetical situation...You've got an acquaintance at West Coast. Not a close friend, but someone you've taken classes with before. And in those classes, this person has generally done as well or better than you. They're a responsible, capable student. But one term, this student disappears for a few weeks at the end of the term. You see them right before you go into take your final exam, and the student says they had to leave the country to care for a sick relative. They asked the professor for an extension, but the professor refused, and now they're totally unprepared for the final and about to fail the class. Except there's a quirk in the testing room. From this student's seat, they can look up at the light fixtures and see a reflection of your desk a few rows away. So, they can copy off your exam with no chance of you getting caught (just accept this as part of the hypothetical). Why the student told you this before cheating, I'm not sure, but now you know their plan. So...what's the right thing to do? Let them copy? Report to the professor? Just move seats (if you do, someone else will sit in your seat and they'll probably copy off of them)? Now, here's the important part. It's not your answer that we're after this week. It's your reasons. The big values that you used to arrive at the specific judgment about this case. For example, you might make the following argument:P: It will help them a lot if they passP: Nobody will get in any troubleC: It's good to let them copyThat's an example of a Consequentialist argument. Your focused on the outcomes of the decision. Specifically, it's a Utilitarian argument, because the big principle required to make that argument work is the premise: the right action is the one that creates that maximized happiness for all involved. But you could arrive at the same conclusion for entirely different reasons. You might say something like this:P: To report the person is to snitchP: You have a duty never to snitchC: You should let them copy or switch seatsThis argument isn't really about outcomes anymore. It invokes a duty - a moral rule that must be followed no matter what. That's a Deontological approach. Obviously, I think there are logical problems with both of those arguments! In the first case, I think there may well be people harmed by cheating, especially if we consider what would happen if everyone did it. In the second, is the duty not to snitch really one you can apply consistently? Would you not report a car theft or a murder? And if your "no snitch" duty only applies some of the time, how do you decide when?So, read up on the different moral perspectives in the book. The prompt mentions four, but there are more! Then, talk about which ones make the most (or event the least) sense to you and try to apply them to some hypotheticals. I look forward to hearing your ideas ;)
EDPD 8044 WU A Plan for Culturally Responsive Advocacy Leadership Essay
research various perspectives of a multicultural education issue and develop an advocacy plan to effectively communicate a ...
EDPD 8044 WU A Plan for Culturally Responsive Advocacy Leadership Essay
research various perspectives of a multicultural education issue and develop an advocacy plan to effectively communicate and advocate for a culturally responsive solution. During the development of your advocacy plan, synthesize and reflect on the major learning points that are applicable to leading culturally responsive social change in your context. To prepare for this Assignment, review the issues you identified in the Equity Audit assignment. The link below is my equity audit assignment: https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn...Review Chapters 1–5 (pp. 1–64) of “An Introduction to Advocacy: Training Guide.” the link below is the intro to advocacy training guide: https://class.content.laureate.net/26ba4b2a7487808f9d5ab43c929aff9e.pdfinstructions:https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn...please let me know if you are unable to open any of the links
PSY211 Stratford University Week 9 Ending Life Early Discussion
Week 9: Jul 23Discussion E (answer question & write two replies)Discussion EDiscussion E: Ending Life Early1. Please read ...
PSY211 Stratford University Week 9 Ending Life Early Discussion
Week 9: Jul 23Discussion E (answer question & write two replies)Discussion EDiscussion E: Ending Life Early1. Please read and watch the following: Euthanasia from Module 11 and watch the following clip of Play Video. The links are provided below. You can copy and paste them into your web browser. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/lifespandevelopment2/chapter/euthanasia/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzp0tp8Fzio ;2. Initial Post (300 words) What are your reactions to Brittany's choice? Should this practice be legal? Imagine if you were Brittany's loved one. How would you respond? Would you support her decision or try to change her mind?Task 9: Please read the Introduction to Death and Dying, The Most Common Causes of Death, The Process of Dying,and 5 Stages of Loss Please read Palliative Care and Hospice and Bereavement and Grief. Please respond to the following questions: 1. Have you ever had to cope with the loss of a loved one? If so, what concepts described in this section provide context that may help you understand your experience and process of grieving? (If you have not experienced the loss of a loved one, which concepts do you think would provide context?)2. If were you were diagnosed with a terminal illness would you choose hospice care or a traditional death in a hospital? Why?Lesson 9: Answer these questions: What are the top three causes of deaths in the United States? What are Kuble-Ross's 5 Stages Loss?
PGCC Psychology Josie An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness Discussion
Part 1: Read: Read the four case studies provided this week. They are included in the Week 6 Learning Resources. Links ...
PGCC Psychology Josie An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness Discussion
Part 1: Read: Read the four case studies provided this week. They are included in the Week 6 Learning Resources. Links to access the case studies are included below as well. Part 2: Main Post: In order to express our mastery of professional psychology’s prerequisite knowledge, skills, and abilities, this week we will exchange responses to diversely different case studies. Select the case study you would like to analyze and discuss. Read the case study carefully and compose your responses to the assigned questions, provided below. Your responses should reflect your unique, personal, response to the case addressed. Once you have crafted your analysis and written your answers, post your answers here as your main post. - - - -- CASES Study 1: Josie: An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness Josie: An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Madness by Joan-Beth Gow. Susan M. Nava, and Kerri W. Augusto. Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Originally published July 30, 2011. https://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/files/josie.pdf This case study is divided into 6 parts. After each part there is a series of questions. Jot down your initial impressions after each part. At the conclusion of your reading, answer the following questions. Post your answers and discuss the case with your classmates. Questions (Required): Answer these three questions. 1. Outline for the class a brief history of this case. 2. Discuss the presenting problem addressing your early and concluding assessment of the problem. That is, in the beginning did you think Josie was physically or mentally ill? How or why did your thoughts change? 3. What kind of treatment strategy would you recommend? Mention theoretical perspectives, or interventions/techniques and prognosis. Questions (Pick Two): Select. then answer two of the following questions. 4. Do you think Josie's behavior or appearance influenced the care she received? Why? How did this impact her case? 5. What questions still remain? What other information would help you more accurately assess what Josie is experiencing? 6. With respect to the general public, how has the treatment of the mentally ill changed over time? 7. Do you think medical professionals are sufficiently trained to differentiate medical from psychological illness? Why or why not? Can you give us an example of another illness which presents as a psychological concern but is chemically based? Study 2: Artificial Sanity Artificial Sanity by Sheila O’Brien Quinn. Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Originally published June 23, 2005. https://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/files/artificial_sanity.pdf Questions: Answer five of the following questions. 1. Discuss two accepted models of mental illness, i.e., psychological, biological, behavioral. What assumptions are made within the models? How do they differ? 2. How do these two different models influence the treatment of people with mental disorders? 3. Tell the class the history of the present case. What does "right to treatment" entail for Singleton? Does Singleton have schizophrenia, in your opinion? 4. What are the assumptions about mental illness held by Singleton's lawyer and the prosecutor? Support your answer with direct quotes from each lawyer. 5. Each lawyer appears to believe in a different model of mental illness. What model is each lawyer using to support his/her argument about how Singleton should be treated? 6. What is artificial sanity? Argue your personal side of the case. Study 3: Sins of the Mother ID Crimefeed (2017, October 25). A look back at Susan Smith – the South Carolina mom killed her two young sons. (Webpage) Read the attached article. Then answer at least 4 of the following questions. http://www.investigationdiscovery.com/crimefeed/crime-history/a-look-back-at-the-susan-smith-case-23-years-after-the-south-carolina-mom-killed-her-2-young-sons Questions: Answer five of the following questions. Susan violated what most people consider our most sacred trust when she killed her children. How could she have done it? Develop a profile of a woman who might kill her own children. Online, find the FBI’s profile of women who kill their own children. Compare your profile with the FBI’s profile.Discuss potential effects that sexual abuse can have on a young woman. How might Susan’s experiences with her stepfather have affected her behavior?Discuss possible pressures on a young couple that marries in their teens, especially under the circumstances of David and Susan’s marriage.Identify nonverbal cues that Susan gave. Discuss how it is possible to tell if someone if lying from nonverbal behavior. What information does the use of the polygraph supply?Speculate on why Susan might have done what she did. Include speculations about her marriage as well as her own childhood and adolescence.Susan wanted relief from loneliness and the problems in her life. She wanted to commit suicide but did not want her sons to suffer as she had after her father’s suicide. She believed that if she killed her sons first and then committed suicide, her sons would suffer less than if she left them on their own. She felt burdened and was overwhelmed by the responsibilities of being a single mother. What role might depression have played in her actions?Classify Susan according to the DSM V?Why didn’t her attorneys use the mental illness defense? Study 4: Nature or Nurture: The Case of a Boy Who Became a Girl Nature or Nurture: The Case of the Boy Who Became a Girl by Keith K. Schillo. Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Originally published November 16, 2011. https://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/files/gender_reassignment.pdf Questions: Answer five of the following questions. 1. Some people have argued that the Johns Hopkins psychologist used this opportunity as an experiment to test his nurture theory of gender identity. What are the expected results of this experiment, assuming that the nurture theory is valid? 2. According to the nurture theory, predict the gender identity Bruce would express if he were not subjected to gender re-assignment surgery and raised as a boy? 3. Provide one peer-reviewed article, selected from our UMGC Library’s databases, that address current research or theory on gender identity. 4. In light of newer research on gender identity, what advice would you give parents who are considering gender re-assignment of a male infant who lacks a penis, but has functional testicles? 5. What are your thoughts on therapist behavior. What guidelines and codes of ethics direct therapists managing cases of this nature?
4 pages
Africa As A Dark Continent 1
1. How does the history of West African kingdoms undermine the idea of sub-Saharan According to Thompsell (2019), most tra ...
Africa As A Dark Continent 1
1. How does the history of West African kingdoms undermine the idea of sub-Saharan According to Thompsell (2019), most travelers largely perceived ...
Earn money selling
your Study Documents