Economics Paper (2 Pages)

User Generated

Nmvm456

Economics

Description

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • 2 pages (approx. 300 words per page), not including title page or references page
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page with topic and name of student

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 16
  • No outside sources are required

Introduction

In this paper, you will apply what you have learned in Chapter 16 to the firm or business you selected in order to see how the concepts can be applied to a business situation.

Keep in mind that throughout this course, papers are intended to bring real-world situations to the course material that we are covering each week. Part of your grade will depend on the connections you make between your chosen firm (which could include the economic environment of your chosen firm, the markets in which your chosen firm interacts with outside actors, the decisions your chosen firm makes, etc., depending on the particular question) and the material from the chapters we covered.

Activity Instructions

For the particular firm/business you selected,* describe the markets in which your firm participates that are monopolistically competitive. Consider the possibility of inputs to the firm as well as your chosen firm’s output. What differences are there between the monopolistically competitive firm’s product and other firms’ output? What causes those differences?

Are there actions that the monopolistically competitive firm is taking to differentiate its products from other firms’ products in that market? Are those actions effective? What are the goals of those particular actions—how does it affect the situation the firm is facing? How and why are consumers’ behaviors affected? Are there other actions that the firm could use to differentiate its product from the products of other firms? Do you think these actions would be effective? Why or why not?

*Note: Most firms chosen by students have some aspects of Monopolistic Competition in their output markets. For this week’s paper focus on those aspects.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

N. Gregory Mankiw Principles of Microeconomics Sixth Edition 16 Monopolistic Competition © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. Premium PowerPoint Slides by Ron Cronovich 2012 UPDATE In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions: • What market structures lie between perfect competition and monopoly, and what are their characteristics? • How do monopolistically competitive firms choose price and quantity? Do they earn economic profit? • In what ways does monopolistic competition affect society’s welfare? • What are the social costs and benefits of advertising? © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 1 INTRODUCTION: Between Monopoly and Competition Two extremes ▪ Perfect competition: many firms, identical products ▪ Monopoly: one firm In between these extremes: imperfect competition ▪ Oligopoly: only a few sellers offer similar or identical products. ▪ Monopolistic competition: many firms sell similar but not identical products. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 2 Characteristics & Examples of Monopolistic Competition Characteristics: ▪ Many sellers ▪ Product differentiation ▪ Free entry and exit Examples: ▪ apartments ▪ books ▪ bottled water ▪ clothing ▪ fast food ▪ night clubs © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 3 Comparing Perfect & Monop. Competition Perfect competition Monopolistic competition number of sellers many many free entry/exit yes yes long-run econ. profits zero zero the products firms sell identical differentiated firm has market power? none, price-taker yes D curve facing firm downwardsloping horizontal © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 4 Comparing Monopoly & Monop. Competition Monopoly Monopolistic competition number of sellers one many free entry/exit no yes long-run econ. profits positive zero firm has market power? yes yes D curve facing firm downwarddownwardsloping sloping (market demand) close substitutes none © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. many 5 A Monopolistically Competitive Firm Earning Profits in the Short Run The firm faces a downward-sloping D curve. At each Q, MR < P. To maximize profit, firm produces Q where MR = MC. Price profit MC ATC P ATC The firm uses the D curve to set P. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. D MR Q Quantity 6 A Monopolistically Competitive Firm With Losses in the Short Run For this firm, P < ATC at the output where MR = MC. The best this firm can do is to minimize its losses. Price MC losses ATC ATC P D MR Q © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. Quantity 7 Monopolistic Competition and Monopoly ▪ Short run: Under monopolistic competition, firm behavior is very similar to monopoly. ▪ Long run: In monopolistic competition, entry and exit drive economic profit to zero. ▪ If profits in the short run: New firms enter market, taking some demand away from existing firms, prices and profits fall. ▪ If losses in the short run: Some firms exit the market, remaining firms enjoy higher demand and prices. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 8 A Monopolistic Competitor in the Long Run Entry and exit occurs until P = ATC and profit = zero. Price Notice that the P = ATC firm charges a markup of price markup over marginal cost and does not MC produce at minimum ATC. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. MC ATC D MR Q Quantity 9 Why Monopolistic Competition Is Less Efficient than Perfect Competition 1. Excess capacity ▪ The monopolistic competitor operates on the downward-sloping part of its ATC curve, produces less than the cost-minimizing output. ▪ Under perfect competition, firms produce the quantity that minimizes ATC. 2. Markup over marginal cost ▪ Under monopolistic competition, P > MC. ▪ Under perfect competition, P = MC. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 10 Monopolistic Competition and Welfare ▪ Monopolistically competitive markets do not have all the desirable welfare properties of perfectly competitive markets. ▪ Because P > MC, the market quantity is below the socially efficient quantity. ▪ Yet, not easy for policymakers to fix this problem: Firms earn zero profits, so cannot require them to reduce prices. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 11 Monopolistic Competition and Welfare ▪ Number of firms in the market may not be optimal, due to external effects from the entry of new firms: ▪ The product-variety externality: surplus consumers get from the introduction of new products ▪ The business-stealing externality: losses incurred by existing firms when new firms enter market ▪ The inefficiencies of monopolistic competition are subtle and hard to measure. No easy way for policymakers to improve the market outcome. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 12 ACTIVE LEARNING Advertising 1 1. So far, we have studied three market structures: perfect competition, monopoly, and monopolistic competition. In each of these, would you expect to see firms spending money to advertise their products? Why or why not? 2. Is advertising good or bad from society’s viewpoint? Try to think of at least one “pro” and “con.” © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. Advertising ▪ In monopolistically competitive industries, product differentiation and markup pricing lead naturally to the use of advertising. ▪ In general, the more differentiated the products, the more advertising firms buy. ▪ Economists disagree about the social value of advertising. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 14 The Critique of Advertising ▪ Critics of advertising believe: ▪ Society is wasting the resources it devotes to advertising. ▪ Firms advertise to manipulate people’s tastes. ▪ Advertising impedes competition—it creates the perception that products are more differentiated than they really are, allowing higher markups. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 15 The Defense of Advertising ▪ Defenders of advertising believe: ▪ It provides useful information to buyers. ▪ Informed buyers can more easily find and exploit price differences. ▪ Thus, advertising promotes competition and reduces market power. ▪ Results of a prominent study: Eyeglasses were more expensive in states that prohibited advertising by eyeglass makers than in states that did not restrict such advertising. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 16 Advertising as a Signal of Quality A firm’s willingness to spend huge amounts on advertising may signal the quality of its product to consumers, regardless of the content of ads. ▪ Ads may convince buyers to try a product once, but the product must be of high quality for people to become repeat buyers. ▪ The most expensive ads are not worthwhile unless they lead to repeat buyers. ▪ When consumers see expensive ads, they think the product must be good if the company is willing to spend so much on advertising. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 17 Brand Names ▪ In many markets, brand name products coexist with generic ones. ▪ Firms with brand names usually spend more on advertising, charge higher prices for the products. ▪ As with advertising, there is disagreement about the economics of brand names… © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 18 The Critique of Brand Names ▪ Critics of brand names believe: ▪ Brand names cause consumers to perceive differences that do not really exist. ▪ Consumers’ willingness to pay more for brand names is irrational, fostered by advertising. ▪ Eliminating govt protection of trademarks would reduce influence of brand names, result in lower prices. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 19 The Defense of Brand Names ▪ Defenders of brand names believe: ▪ Brand names provide information about quality to consumers. ▪ Companies with brand names have incentive to maintain quality, to protect the reputation of their brand names. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 20 CONCLUSION ▪ Differentiated products are everywhere; examples of monopolistic competition abound. ▪ The theory of monopolistic competition describes many markets in the economy, yet offers little guidance to policymakers looking to improve the market’s allocation of resources. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 21 S U MMA RY • A monopolistically competitive market has many firms, differentiated products, and free entry. • Each firm in a monopolistically competitive market has excess capacity—it produces less than the quantity that minimizes ATC. Each firm charges a price above marginal cost. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. S U MMA RY • Monopolistic competition does not have all of the desirable welfare properties of perfect competition. There is a deadweight loss caused by the markup of price over marginal cost. Also, the number of firms (and thus varieties) can be too large or too small. There is no clear way for policymakers to improve the market outcome. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. S U MMA RY • Product differentiation and markup pricing lead to the use of advertising and brand names. Critics of advertising and brand names argue that firms use them to reduce competition and take advantage of consumer irrationality. Defenders argue that firms use them to inform consumers and to compete more vigorously on price and product quality. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

hello there buddy here is ...


Anonymous
Great study resource, helped me a lot.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags