research report (A study of the impact of Ransomware)

Anonymous
timer Asked: Dec 22nd, 2018

Question description

Research description will be given down in the file below.

A sample will be given also down below.

words: 2000

No similarity

Paper Title* (use style: paper title) Subtitle as needed (paper subtitle) Authors Name/s per 1st Affiliation (Author) Authors Name/s per 2nd Affiliation (Author) line 1 (of Affiliation): dept. name of organization line 2-name of organization, acronyms acceptable line 3-City, Country line 4-e-mail address if desired line 1 (of Affiliation): dept. name of organization line 2-name of organization, acronyms acceptable line 3-City, Country line 4-e-mail address if desired Abstract—This electronic document is a “live” template and already defines the components of your paper [title, text, heads, etc.] in its style sheet. *CRITICAL: Do Not Use Symbols, Special Characters, or Math in Paper Title or Abstract. (Abstract) and not as an independent document. Please do not revise any of the current designations. Keywords—component; formatting; style; styling; insert (key words) Before you begin to format your paper, first write and save the content as a separate text file. Keep your text and graphic files separate until after the text has been formatted and styled. Do not use hard tabs, and limit use of hard returns to only one return at the end of a paragraph. Do not add any kind of pagination anywhere in the paper. Do not number text headsthe template will do that for you. I. INTRODUCTION (HEADING 1) This template, modified in MS Word 2007 and saved as a “Word 97-2003 Document” for the PC, provides authors with most of the formatting specifications needed for preparing electronic versions of their papers. All standard paper components have been specified for three reasons: (1) ease of use when formatting individual papers, (2) automatic compliance to electronic requirements that facilitate the concurrent or later production of electronic products, and (3) conformity of style throughout a conference proceedings. Margins, column widths, line spacing, and type styles are builtin; examples of the type styles are provided throughout this document and are identified in italic type, within parentheses, following the example. Some components, such as multileveled equations, graphics, and tables are not prescribed, although the various table text styles are provided. The formatter will need to create these components, incorporating the applicable criteria that follow. II. EASE OF USE A. Selecting a Template (Heading 2) First, confirm that you have the correct template for your paper size. This template has been tailored for output on the A4 paper size. If you are using US letter-sized paper, please close this file and download the file “MSW_USltr_format”. B. Maintaining the Integrity of the Specifications The template is used to format your paper and style the text. All margins, column widths, line spaces, and text fonts are prescribed; please do not alter them. You may note peculiarities. For example, the head margin in this template measures proportionately more than is customary. This measurement and others are deliberate, using specifications that anticipate your paper as one part of the entire proceedings, Identify applicable sponsor/s here. If no sponsors, delete this text box (sponsors). III. PREPARE YOUR PAPER BEFORE STYLING Finally, complete content and organizational editing before formatting. Please take note of the following items when proofreading spelling and grammar: A. Abbreviations and Acronyms Define abbreviations and acronyms the first time they are used in the text, even after they have been defined in the abstract. Abbreviations such as IEEE, SI, MKS, CGS, sc, dc, and rms do not have to be defined. Do not use abbreviations in the title or heads unless they are unavoidable. B. Units • Use either SI (MKS) or CGS as primary units. (SI units are encouraged.) English units may be used as secondary units (in parentheses). An exception would be the use of English units as identifiers in trade, such as “3.5-inch disk drive.” • Avoid combining SI and CGS units, such as current in amperes and magnetic field in oersteds. This often leads to confusion because equations do not balance dimensionally. If you must use mixed units, clearly state the units for each quantity that you use in an equation. • Do not mix complete spellings and abbreviations of units: “Wb/m2” or “webers per square meter,” not “webers/m2.” Spell units when they appear in text: “...a few henries,” not “...a few H.” • Use a zero before decimal points: “0.25,” not “.25.” Use “cm3,” not “cc.” (bullet list) C. Equations The equations are an exception to the prescribed specifications of this template. You will need to determine whether or not your equation should be typed using either the Times New Roman or the Symbol font (please no other font). To create multileveled equations, it may be necessary to treat the equation as a graphic and insert it into the text after your paper is styled. Number equations consecutively. Equation numbers, within parentheses, are to position flush right, as in (1), using a right tab stop. To make your equations more compact, you may use the solidus ( / ), the exp function, or appropriate exponents. Italicize Roman symbols for quantities and variables, but not Greek symbols. Use a long dash rather than a hyphen for a minus sign. Punctuate equations with commas or periods when they are part of a sentence, as in a+b = () Note that the equation is centered using a center tab stop. Be sure that the symbols in your equation have been defined before or immediately following the equation. Use “(1),” not “Eq. (1)” or “equation (1),” except at the beginning of a sentence: “Equation (1) is ...” D. Some Common Mistakes • The word “data” is plural, not singular. • The subscript for the permeability of vacuum 0, and other common scientific constants, is zero with subscript formatting, not a lowercase letter “o.” • In American English, commas, semi-/colons, periods, question and exclamation marks are located within quotation marks only when a complete thought or name is cited, such as a title or full quotation. When quotation marks are used, instead of a bold or italic typeface, to highlight a word or phrase, punctuation should appear outside of the quotation marks. A parenthetical phrase or statement at the end of a sentence is punctuated outside of the closing parenthesis (like this). (A parenthetical sentence is punctuated within the parentheses.) • A graph within a graph is an “inset,” not an “insert.” The word alternatively is preferred to the word “alternately” (unless you really mean something that alternates). • Do not use the word “essentially” “approximately” or “effectively.” to mean • In your paper title, if the words “that uses” can accurately replace the word using, capitalize the “u”; if not, keep using lower-cased. • Be aware of the different meanings of the homophones “affect” and “effect,” “complement” and “compliment,” “discreet” and “discrete,” “principal” and “principle.” • Do not confuse “imply” and “infer.” • The prefix “non” is not a word; it should be joined to the word it modifies, usually without a hyphen. • There is no period after the “et” in the Latin abbreviation “et al.” • The abbreviation “i.e.” means “that is,” and the abbreviation “e.g.” means “for example.” An excellent style manual for science writers is [7]. IV. USING THE TEMPLATE After the text edit has been completed, the paper is ready for the template. Duplicate the template file by using the Save As command, and use the naming convention prescribed by your conference for the name of your paper. In this newly created file, highlight all of the contents and import your prepared text file. You are now ready to style your paper; use the scroll down window on the left of the MS Word Formatting toolbar.  +  =  () () A. Authors and Affiliations The template is designed so that author affiliations are not repeated each time for multiple authors of the same affiliation. Please keep your affiliations as succinct as possible (for example, do not differentiate among departments of the same organization). This template was designed for two affiliations. 1) For author/s of only one affiliation (Heading 3): To change the default, adjust the template as follows. a) Selection (Heading 4): Highlight all author and affiliation lines. b) Change number of columns: Select the Columns icon from the MS Word Standard toolbar and then select “1 Column” from the selection palette. c) Deletion: Delete the author and affiliation lines for the second affiliation. 2) For author/s of more than two affiliations: To change the default, adjust the template as follows. a) Selection: Highlight all author and affiliation lines. b) Change number of columns: Select the “Columns” icon from the MS Word Standard toolbar and then select “1 Column” from the selection palette. c) Highlight author and affiliation lines of affiliation 1 and copy this selection. d) Formatting: Insert one hard return immediately after the last character of the last affiliation line. Then paste down the copy of affiliation 1. Repeat as necessary for each additional affiliation. e) Reassign number of columns: Place your cursor to the right of the last character of the last affiliation line of an even numbered affiliation (e.g., if there are five affiliations, place your cursor at end of fourth affiliation). Drag the cursor up to highlight all of the above author and affiliation lines. Go to Column icon and select “2 Columns”. If you have an odd number of affiliations, the final affiliation will be centered on the page; all previous will be in two columns. B. Identify the Headings Headings, or heads, are organizational devices that guide the reader through your paper. There are two types: component heads and text heads. Component heads identify the different components of your paper and are not topically subordinate to each other. Examples include ACKNOWLEDGMENTS and REFERENCES, and for these, the correct style to use is “Heading 5.” Use “figure caption” for your Figure captions, and “table head” for your table title. Run-in heads, such as “Abstract,” will require you to apply a style (in this case, italic) in addition to the style provided by the drop down menu to differentiate the head from the text. Text heads organize the topics on a relational, hierarchical basis. For example, the paper title is the primary text head because all subsequent material relates and elaborates on this one topic. If there are two or more sub-topics, the next level head (uppercase Roman numerals) should be used and, conversely, if there are not at least two sub-topics, then no subheads should be introduced. Styles named “Heading 1,” “Heading 2,” “Heading 3,” and “Heading 4” are prescribed. C. Figures and Tables 1) Positioning Figures and Tables: Place figures and tables at the top and bottom of columns. Avoid placing them in the middle of columns. Large figures and tables may span across both columns. Figure captions should be below the figures; table heads should appear above the tables. Insert figures and tables after they are cited in the text. Use the abbreviation “Fig. 1,” even at the beginning of a sentence. TABLE I. Table Head copy Table Column Head Subhead ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Heading 5) The preferred spelling of the word “acknowledgment” in America is without an “e” after the “g.” Avoid the stilted expression “one of us (R. B. G.) thanks ...”. Instead, try “R. B. G. thanks...”. Put sponsor acknowledgments in the unnumbered footnote on the first page. REFERENCES The template will number citations consecutively within brackets [1]. The sentence punctuation follows the bracket [2]. Refer simply to the reference number, as in [3]—do not use “Ref. [3]” or “reference [3]” except at the beginning of a sentence: “Reference [3] was the first ...” Number footnotes separately in superscripts. Place the actual footnote at the bottom of the column in which it was cited. Do not put footnotes in the reference list. Use letters for table footnotes. Unless there are six authors or more give all authors’ names; do not use “et al.”. Papers that have not been published, even if they have been submitted for publication, should be cited as “unpublished” [4]. Papers that have been accepted for publication should be cited as “in press” [5]. Capitalize only the first word in a paper title, except for proper nouns and element symbols. For papers published in translation journals, please give the English citation first, followed by the original foreign-language citation [6]. TABLE STYLES Table column subhead example, write the quantity “Magnetization,” or “Magnetization, M,” not just “M.” If including units in the label, present them within parentheses. Do not label axes only with units. In the example, write “Magnetization (A/m)” or “Magnetization (A ( m(1),” not just “A/m.” Do not label axes with a ratio of quantities and units. For example, write “Temperature (K),” not “Temperature/K.” Subhead a More table copy [1] a. Sample of a Table footnote. (Table footnote) b. We suggest that you use a text box to insert a graphic (which is ideally a 300 dpi resolution TIFF or EPS file with all fonts embedded) because this method is somewhat more stable than directly inserting a picture. To have non-visible rules on your frame, use the MSWord “Format” pull-down menu, select Text Box > Colors and Lines to choose No Fill and No Line. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Fig. 1. Example of a figure caption. (figure caption) Figure Labels: Use 8 point Times New Roman for Figure labels. Use words rather than symbols or abbreviations when writing Figure axis labels to avoid confusing the reader. As an [7] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April 1955. (references) J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68-73. I.S. Jacobs and C.P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G.T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271-350. K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished. R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J. Name Stand. Abbrev., in press. Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740-741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982]. M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.
Mobile Phone Forensics Implementation and Analysis by Issa Al Balushi (15201179) FILE 7209_ISSA_AL_BALUSHI__15201179__MOBILE_PHONE_FORENSICS_IMPL EMENT AT ION_AND_ANALYSIS_29631_720588035.DOCX (1.98M) T IME SUBMIT T ED 18-DEC-2017 10:58PM (UT C+0400) WORD COUNT 3679 SUBMISSION ID 897383372 CHARACT ER COUNT 21293 Mobile Phone Forensics Implementation and Analysis GRADEMARK REPORT FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS 88 Instructor First Marker: Dr Ramalingam /100 It's an outstanding abstract no f law f ound. Student has implemented mobile phone f orensics and report this report. Introduction is appropriate excellent literature review f or causes the wide variety of resources with citations analysis implementation and discussion is appropriate outstanding logical Sequencing is there appropriate. All the other sections also excellent outstanding. T his report is selected to be published in a research paper. 2nd Marker Agrees to First Marker marks and comments PAGE 1 PAGE 2 PAGE 3 PAGE 4 PAGE 5 PAGE 6 PAGE 7 PAGE 8 PAGE 9 PAGE 10 RUBRIC: ET 2A SEP 17 JAN 18 ABST RACT (10%) 8 8 .0 0 / 10 0 100 / 100 Abstract of the report in 100 to 150 words (10 Marks) SUB STANDARD / NO Abstract not f ound ATTEMP (0) POOR (20) Abstract f ails to concentrate of the report. Just f illed with text which is totally out of scope of the report SATISFACTORY (40 Abstract is very short or long ; similar to introduction; MARKS) (40) GOOD (50) Abstract covers some part of the report whereas the reader has to read the report to understand the purpose of the report VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) Very good abstract covering most of the report however the write-up can be f urther improved EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) (70) Excellent abstract which covers the whole report and impressing the reader OUTSTANDING( 100 Outstanding abstract. No f law in writing. Conveying the purpose of the report in an MARKS) exceptional way. (100) INT RODUCT ION (10%) 70 / 100 SUB STANDARD / NO Student’s introduction of topic is missing. ATTEMP (0) POOR (20) Student's introduction of the topic is poor SATISFACTORY (40 Student's introduction of the topic is passable f or understanding the topic MARKS) (40) GOOD (50) Student's introduction of the topic is adequate f or understanding in terms of clarity and thoroughness. Few details have been lef t out. VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) Student's introduction of the topic is adequate f or understanding in terms of clarity and thoroughness. No major detail has been lef t out. EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) Student's introduction of the topic is clear and through. Every detail required to understand the topic is included and clearly stated. (70) OUTSTANDING( 100 Exceptional work showcased by the student. MARKS) (100) LIT . REVIEW (20%) 70 / 100 Literature review / Knowledge integration ( 20 Marks) SUB STANDARD / NO No attempt is made by the student ATTEMP (0) POOR (20) Poorly done literature review. Fails to review the sources and f ails to produce the sensible literature ; totally illogical text is given SATISFACTORY (40 T he report consists of paraphrased text f rom various sources missing logical f low MARKS) and coherence (40) GOOD (50) T he report has evidence of good literature review whereas the sources and points discussed are not in-depth VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) T he report is logical in sequence whereas f urther improvement is required in paraphrasing and summarisation to make it as strong argument EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) (70) T he report has excellent ref erence to academically accepted sources ; logical sequence of the report is f ound; clear justif ication is given OUTSTANDING( 100 Brilliantly researched work supported with analytical study; All the resources are MARKS) prof essionally accepted and f rom well-known sources. (100) ANALYSIS: (15%) 100 / 100 Support of Research / Analysis ( 15 Marks) SUB STANDARD / NO Not attempted/ No supporting data provided ATTEMP (0) POOR (20) No f acts are provided/ Provided f acts are insignif icant/ irrelevant to the argument. No logical integration is f ound SATISFACTORY (40 Student attempted to f etch f acts and f igures but not f rom valid sources. Not all web MARKS) sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. (40) GOOD (50) Student attempted to f etch f acts and f igures but logical integration is not adequate. Fewer than 5 current sources, or f ewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) Some valid f acts and f igures are included. Fewer than 5 current sources, or f ewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible. EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) (70) Report ref ers to 5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative. Most f acts and f igures are signif icant. OUTSTANDING( 100 Minimum of 5 latest sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or MARKS) scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized (100) sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative. DISCUSSION (20%) 100 / 100 T opic Focus and Depth of Discussion ( 20 Marks) SUB STANDARD / NO Not attempted ATTEMP (0) POOR (20) T he topic is not clearly def ined. No discussion f ound or wrong direction of discussion is f ound SATISFACTORY (40 T he topic is too broad f or the scope of this assignment. Some points are discussed MARKS) with clear details. (40) GOOD (50) T he topic is too broad f or the scope of this assignment. T he writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations f rom others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) T he topic is f ocused but lacks direction. In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper. EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) (70) T he topic is f ocused enough f or the scope of this assignment. Research statement provides direction f or the paper. In-depth discussion & elaboration f ound in most sections of the paper. OUTSTANDING( 100 T he topic is f ocused narrowly enough f or the scope of this assignment. Research MARKS) statement provides direction f or the paper. In-depth discussion & elaboration f ound (100) in all sections of the paper. COHERENCE / R (10%) 100 / 100 Coherence / Report Organisation / Conclusion SUB STANDARD / NO Very bad organisation. No separation of sections, logical organisation is f ound. ATTEMP Unacceptable report. (0) POOR No logical f low is f ound. Disjoint inf ormation without any logical sequence is f ound. (20) SATISFACTORY (40 Author sometimes ties together inf ormation f rom the sources. Paper does not f low MARKS) disjointedness is apparent. (40) GOOD (50) Inf ormation ties together f or f ew sources. Paper f lows with only f ew joints. VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) Logical sequencing is ensured but more coherence and logical linking is required. Author's writing demonstrates the relationship among material obtained f rom some sources. EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) (70) Paper f lows f rom one issue to the next in logical order. Clear demarcation of each discussion f ound. Author's writing demonstrates the relationship among material obtained f rom most sources. OUTSTANDING( 100 Paper f lows f rom one issue to the next seamlessly and in logical order. Author's MARKS) writing demonstrates the relationship among material obtained f rom all sources. (100) REP. ST RUCT UR (5%) 100 / 100 Report Structure, spelling, Grammar ( 5 Marks) SUB STANDARD / NO Report is badly organized ; multiple f ont types are used ; no justif ication ; very bad in ATTEMP presence (0) POOR (20) Poor Structure ; lot of f ormatting errors and spelling mistakes are f ound SATISFACTORY (40 May have random organization, lacking internal paragraph structure and use f ew or MARKS) inappropriate transitions. Paragraphs may lack topic sentences or main ideas, or may (40) be too general or too specif ic to be ef f ective. Paragraphs may not all relate to paper's subject. GOOD (50) May list ideas or arrange them randomly rather than using logical structure. May use transitions, but they are not in a logical sequence. While each paragraph may relate to central idea, logic is not always clear. Paragraphs have topic sentences but may be overly general, and arrangement of sentences within paragraphs may lack structure. VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses f airly sophisticated transitional devices; e.g., may move f rom least to more important idea. Some logical links may be f aulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to paper's central idea. EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) (70) Uses a logical structure appropriate to paper's subject and purpose. Sophisticated transitional sentences of ten develop one idea f rom the previous one or identif y their logical relations. It guides the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas. OUTSTANDING( 100 Prof essional touch is f ound in the report structure; Student's ef f ort in f ormatting and MARKS) presenting the report is clearly visible. Each section is caref ully f ormatted and no (100) visible errors f ound. REFERENCES (10%) 70 / 100 Citation & Ref erences ( 10 Marks) SUB STANDARD / NO No ref erences are f ound ATTEMP (0) POOR (20) General sites such as google , Wikipedia are given SATISFACTORY (40 Identif y a f ew of the most signif icant articles. MARKS) (40) GOOD (50) Identif y some of the most signif icant articles. VERY GOOD (60 MARKS) (60) Identif y most of the most signif icant articles. EXCELLENT (70 MARKS) (70) Identif ied all of the most signif icant articles. OUTSTANDING( 100 Perf ect Harvard Style is used f or all citations MARKS) (100)

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Studypool Tutor
School: Duke University
Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students
flag Report DMCA
Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors