Paper Title* (use style: paper title)
Subtitle as needed (paper subtitle)
Authors Name/s per 1st Affiliation (Author)
Authors Name/s per 2nd Affiliation (Author)
line 1 (of Affiliation): dept. name of organization
line 2-name of organization, acronyms acceptable
line 3-City, Country
line 4-e-mail address if desired
line 1 (of Affiliation): dept. name of organization
line 2-name of organization, acronyms acceptable
line 3-City, Country
line 4-e-mail address if desired
Abstract—This electronic document is a “live” template and
already defines the components of your paper [title, text, heads,
etc.] in its style sheet. *CRITICAL: Do Not Use Symbols, Special
Characters, or Math in Paper Title or Abstract. (Abstract)
and not as an independent document. Please do not revise any
of the current designations.
Keywords—component; formatting; style; styling; insert (key
words)
Before you begin to format your paper, first write and save
the content as a separate text file. Keep your text and graphic
files separate until after the text has been formatted and styled.
Do not use hard tabs, and limit use of hard returns to only one
return at the end of a paragraph. Do not add any kind of
pagination anywhere in the paper. Do not number text headsthe template will do that for you.
I. INTRODUCTION (HEADING 1)
This template, modified in MS Word 2007 and saved as a
“Word 97-2003 Document” for the PC, provides authors with
most of the formatting specifications needed for preparing
electronic versions of their papers. All standard paper
components have been specified for three reasons: (1) ease of
use when formatting individual papers, (2) automatic
compliance to electronic requirements that facilitate the
concurrent or later production of electronic products, and (3)
conformity of style throughout a conference proceedings.
Margins, column widths, line spacing, and type styles are builtin; examples of the type styles are provided throughout this
document and are identified in italic type, within parentheses,
following the example. Some components, such as multileveled equations, graphics, and tables are not prescribed,
although the various table text styles are provided. The
formatter will need to create these components, incorporating
the applicable criteria that follow.
II. EASE OF USE
A. Selecting a Template (Heading 2)
First, confirm that you have the correct template for your
paper size. This template has been tailored for output on the A4
paper size. If you are using US letter-sized paper, please close
this file and download the file “MSW_USltr_format”.
B. Maintaining the Integrity of the Specifications
The template is used to format your paper and style the text.
All margins, column widths, line spaces, and text fonts are
prescribed; please do not alter them. You may note
peculiarities. For example, the head margin in this template
measures proportionately more than is customary. This
measurement and others are deliberate, using specifications
that anticipate your paper as one part of the entire proceedings,
Identify applicable sponsor/s here. If no sponsors, delete this text box
(sponsors).
III. PREPARE YOUR PAPER BEFORE STYLING
Finally, complete content and organizational editing before
formatting. Please take note of the following items when
proofreading spelling and grammar:
A. Abbreviations and Acronyms
Define abbreviations and acronyms the first time they are
used in the text, even after they have been defined in the
abstract. Abbreviations such as IEEE, SI, MKS, CGS, sc, dc,
and rms do not have to be defined. Do not use abbreviations in
the title or heads unless they are unavoidable.
B. Units
• Use either SI (MKS) or CGS as primary units. (SI units
are encouraged.) English units may be used as
secondary units (in parentheses). An exception would
be the use of English units as identifiers in trade, such
as “3.5-inch disk drive.”
• Avoid combining SI and CGS units, such as current in
amperes and magnetic field in oersteds. This often leads
to confusion because equations do not balance
dimensionally. If you must use mixed units, clearly
state the units for each quantity that you use in an
equation.
• Do not mix complete spellings and abbreviations of
units: “Wb/m2” or “webers per square meter,” not
“webers/m2.” Spell units when they appear in text: “...a
few henries,” not “...a few H.”
• Use a zero before decimal points: “0.25,” not “.25.” Use
“cm3,” not “cc.” (bullet list)
C. Equations
The equations are an exception to the prescribed
specifications of this template. You will need to determine
whether or not your equation should be typed using either the
Times New Roman or the Symbol font (please no other font).
To create multileveled equations, it may be necessary to treat
the equation as a graphic and insert it into the text after your
paper is styled.
Number equations consecutively. Equation numbers, within
parentheses, are to position flush right, as in (1), using a right
tab stop. To make your equations more compact, you may use
the solidus ( / ), the exp function, or appropriate exponents.
Italicize Roman symbols for quantities and variables, but not
Greek symbols. Use a long dash rather than a hyphen for a
minus sign. Punctuate equations with commas or periods when
they are part of a sentence, as in
a+b =
()
Note that the equation is centered using a center tab stop.
Be sure that the symbols in your equation have been defined
before or immediately following the equation. Use “(1),” not
“Eq. (1)” or “equation (1),” except at the beginning of a
sentence: “Equation (1) is ...”
D. Some Common Mistakes
• The word “data” is plural, not singular.
• The subscript for the permeability of vacuum 0, and
other common scientific constants, is zero with
subscript formatting, not a lowercase letter “o.”
• In American English, commas, semi-/colons, periods,
question and exclamation marks are located within
quotation marks only when a complete thought or name
is cited, such as a title or full quotation. When quotation
marks are used, instead of a bold or italic typeface, to
highlight a word or phrase, punctuation should appear
outside of the quotation marks. A parenthetical phrase
or statement at the end of a sentence is punctuated
outside of the closing parenthesis (like this). (A
parenthetical sentence is punctuated within the
parentheses.)
• A graph within a graph is an “inset,” not an “insert.”
The word alternatively is preferred to the word
“alternately” (unless you really mean something that
alternates).
• Do not use the word “essentially”
“approximately” or “effectively.”
to
mean
• In your paper title, if the words “that uses” can
accurately replace the word using, capitalize the “u”; if
not, keep using lower-cased.
• Be aware of the different meanings of the homophones
“affect” and “effect,” “complement” and “compliment,”
“discreet” and “discrete,” “principal” and “principle.”
• Do not confuse “imply” and “infer.”
• The prefix “non” is not a word; it should be joined to
the word it modifies, usually without a hyphen.
• There is no period after the “et” in the Latin
abbreviation “et al.”
• The abbreviation “i.e.” means “that is,” and the
abbreviation “e.g.” means “for example.”
An excellent style manual for science writers is [7].
IV. USING THE TEMPLATE
After the text edit has been completed, the paper is ready
for the template. Duplicate the template file by using the Save
As command, and use the naming convention prescribed by
your conference for the name of your paper. In this newly
created file, highlight all of the contents and import your
prepared text file. You are now ready to style your paper; use
the scroll down window on the left of the MS Word Formatting
toolbar.
+ =
()
()
A. Authors and Affiliations
The template is designed so that author affiliations are not
repeated each time for multiple authors of the same affiliation.
Please keep your affiliations as succinct as possible (for
example, do not differentiate among departments of the same
organization). This template was designed for two affiliations.
1) For author/s of only one affiliation (Heading 3): To
change the default, adjust the template as follows.
a) Selection (Heading 4): Highlight all author and
affiliation lines.
b) Change number of columns: Select the Columns icon
from the MS Word Standard toolbar and then select “1
Column” from the selection palette.
c) Deletion: Delete the author and affiliation lines for
the second affiliation.
2) For author/s of more than two affiliations: To change
the default, adjust the template as follows.
a) Selection: Highlight all author and affiliation lines.
b) Change number of columns: Select the “Columns”
icon from the MS Word Standard toolbar and then select “1
Column” from the selection palette.
c) Highlight author and affiliation lines of affiliation 1
and copy this selection.
d) Formatting: Insert one hard return immediately after
the last character of the last affiliation line. Then paste down
the copy of affiliation 1. Repeat as necessary for each
additional affiliation.
e) Reassign number of columns: Place your cursor to
the right of the last character of the last affiliation line of an
even numbered affiliation (e.g., if there are five affiliations,
place your cursor at end of fourth affiliation). Drag the cursor
up to highlight all of the above author and affiliation lines. Go
to Column icon and select “2 Columns”. If you have an odd
number of affiliations, the final affiliation will be centered on
the page; all previous will be in two columns.
B. Identify the Headings
Headings, or heads, are organizational devices that guide
the reader through your paper. There are two types: component
heads and text heads.
Component heads identify the different components of your
paper and are not topically subordinate to each other. Examples
include ACKNOWLEDGMENTS and REFERENCES, and for
these, the correct style to use is “Heading 5.” Use “figure
caption” for your Figure captions, and “table head” for your
table title. Run-in heads, such as “Abstract,” will require you to
apply a style (in this case, italic) in addition to the style
provided by the drop down menu to differentiate the head from
the text.
Text heads organize the topics on a relational, hierarchical
basis. For example, the paper title is the primary text head
because all subsequent material relates and elaborates on this
one topic. If there are two or more sub-topics, the next level
head (uppercase Roman numerals) should be used and,
conversely, if there are not at least two sub-topics, then no
subheads should be introduced. Styles named “Heading 1,”
“Heading 2,” “Heading 3,” and “Heading 4” are prescribed.
C. Figures and Tables
1) Positioning Figures and Tables: Place figures and
tables at the top and bottom of columns. Avoid placing them in
the middle of columns. Large figures and tables may span
across both columns. Figure captions should be below the
figures; table heads should appear above the tables. Insert
figures and tables after they are cited in the text. Use the
abbreviation “Fig. 1,” even at the beginning of a sentence.
TABLE I.
Table
Head
copy
Table Column Head
Subhead
ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Heading 5)
The preferred spelling of the word “acknowledgment” in
America is without an “e” after the “g.” Avoid the stilted
expression “one of us (R. B. G.) thanks ...”. Instead, try “R. B.
G. thanks...”. Put sponsor acknowledgments in the unnumbered
footnote on the first page.
REFERENCES
The template will number citations consecutively within
brackets [1]. The sentence punctuation follows the bracket [2].
Refer simply to the reference number, as in [3]—do not use
“Ref. [3]” or “reference [3]” except at the beginning of a
sentence: “Reference [3] was the first ...”
Number footnotes separately in superscripts. Place the
actual footnote at the bottom of the column in which it was
cited. Do not put footnotes in the reference list. Use letters for
table footnotes.
Unless there are six authors or more give all authors’
names; do not use “et al.”. Papers that have not been published,
even if they have been submitted for publication, should be
cited as “unpublished” [4]. Papers that have been accepted for
publication should be cited as “in press” [5]. Capitalize only
the first word in a paper title, except for proper nouns and
element symbols.
For papers published in translation journals, please give the
English citation first, followed by the original foreign-language
citation [6].
TABLE STYLES
Table column subhead
example, write
the quantity “Magnetization,” or
“Magnetization, M,” not just “M.” If including units in the
label, present them within parentheses. Do not label axes only
with units. In the example, write “Magnetization (A/m)” or
“Magnetization (A ( m(1),” not just “A/m.” Do not label axes
with a ratio of quantities and units. For example, write
“Temperature (K),” not “Temperature/K.”
Subhead
a
More table copy
[1]
a.
Sample of a Table footnote. (Table footnote)
b.
We suggest that you use a text box to insert a graphic
(which is ideally a 300 dpi resolution TIFF or EPS file with
all fonts embedded) because this method is somewhat more
stable than directly inserting a picture.
To have non-visible rules on your frame, use the
MSWord “Format” pull-down menu, select Text Box >
Colors and Lines to choose No Fill and No Line.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
Fig. 1. Example of a figure caption. (figure caption)
Figure Labels: Use 8 point Times New Roman for Figure
labels. Use words rather than symbols or abbreviations when
writing Figure axis labels to avoid confusing the reader. As an
[7]
G. Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of
Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil.
Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April 1955.
(references)
J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol.
2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68-73.
I.S. Jacobs and C.P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange
anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G.T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New
York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271-350.
K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.
R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J. Name
Stand. Abbrev., in press.
Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy
studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface,” IEEE
Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740-741, August 1987 [Digests 9th
Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982].
M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA:
University Science, 1989.
Mobile Phone Forensics
Implementation and Analysis
by Issa Al Balushi (15201179)
FILE
7209_ISSA_AL_BALUSHI__15201179__MOBILE_PHONE_FORENSICS_IMPL
EMENT AT ION_AND_ANALYSIS_29631_720588035.DOCX (1.98M)
T IME SUBMIT T ED
18-DEC-2017 10:58PM (UT C+0400)
WORD COUNT
3679
SUBMISSION ID
897383372
CHARACT ER COUNT
21293
Mobile Phone Forensics Implementation and Analysis
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE
GENERAL COMMENTS
88
Instructor
First Marker: Dr Ramalingam
/100
It's an outstanding abstract no f law f ound. Student
has implemented mobile phone f orensics and report
this report. Introduction is appropriate excellent
literature review f or causes the wide variety of
resources with citations analysis implementation and
discussion is appropriate outstanding logical
Sequencing is there appropriate. All the other
sections also excellent outstanding. T his report is
selected to be published in a research paper.
2nd Marker Agrees to First Marker marks and
comments
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
RUBRIC: ET 2A SEP 17 JAN 18
ABST RACT (10%)
8 8 .0 0 / 10 0
100 / 100
Abstract of the report in 100 to 150 words (10 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Abstract not f ound
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
Abstract f ails to concentrate of the report. Just f illed with text which is totally out of
scope of the report
SATISFACTORY (40 Abstract is very short or long ; similar to introduction;
MARKS)
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Abstract covers some part of the report whereas the reader has to read the report to
understand the purpose of the report
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Very good abstract covering most of the report however the write-up can be f urther
improved
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Excellent abstract which covers the whole report and impressing the reader
OUTSTANDING( 100 Outstanding abstract. No f law in writing. Conveying the purpose of the report in an
MARKS)
exceptional way.
(100)
INT RODUCT ION (10%)
70 / 100
SUB STANDARD / NO Student’s introduction of topic is missing.
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
Student's introduction of the topic is poor
SATISFACTORY (40 Student's introduction of the topic is passable f or understanding the topic
MARKS)
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Student's introduction of the topic is adequate f or understanding in terms of clarity
and thoroughness. Few details have been lef t out.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Student's introduction of the topic is adequate f or understanding in terms of clarity
and thoroughness. No major detail has been lef t out.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
Student's introduction of the topic is clear and through. Every detail required to
understand the topic is included and clearly stated.
(70)
OUTSTANDING( 100 Exceptional work showcased by the student.
MARKS)
(100)
LIT . REVIEW (20%)
70 / 100
Literature review / Knowledge integration ( 20 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO No attempt is made by the student
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
Poorly done literature review. Fails to review the sources and f ails to produce the
sensible literature ; totally illogical text is given
SATISFACTORY (40 T he report consists of paraphrased text f rom various sources missing logical f low
MARKS)
and coherence
(40)
GOOD
(50)
T he report has evidence of good literature review whereas the sources and points
discussed are not in-depth
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
T he report is logical in sequence whereas f urther improvement is required in
paraphrasing and summarisation to make it as strong argument
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
T he report has excellent ref erence to academically accepted sources ; logical
sequence of the report is f ound; clear justif ication is given
OUTSTANDING( 100 Brilliantly researched work supported with analytical study; All the resources are
MARKS)
prof essionally accepted and f rom well-known sources.
(100)
ANALYSIS: (15%)
100 / 100
Support of Research / Analysis ( 15 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Not attempted/ No supporting data provided
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
No f acts are provided/ Provided f acts are insignif icant/ irrelevant to the argument. No
logical integration is f ound
SATISFACTORY (40 Student attempted to f etch f acts and f igures but not f rom valid sources. Not all web
MARKS)
sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Student attempted to f etch f acts and f igures but logical integration is not adequate.
Fewer than 5 current sources, or f ewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles
or scholarly books.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Some valid f acts and f igures are included. Fewer than 5 current sources, or f ewer
than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized
are credible.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Report ref ers to 5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles
or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative. Most f acts and f igures are
signif icant.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Minimum of 5 latest sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or
MARKS)
scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized
(100)
sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if
they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
DISCUSSION (20%)
100 / 100
T opic Focus and Depth of Discussion ( 20 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Not attempted
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
T he topic is not clearly def ined. No discussion f ound or wrong direction of
discussion is f ound
SATISFACTORY (40 T he topic is too broad f or the scope of this assignment. Some points are discussed
MARKS)
with clear details.
(40)
GOOD
(50)
T he topic is too broad f or the scope of this assignment. T he writer has omitted
pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations f rom others outweigh
the writer’s own ideas excessively.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
T he topic is f ocused but lacks direction. In-depth discussion & elaboration in most
sections of the paper.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
T he topic is f ocused enough f or the scope of this assignment. Research statement
provides direction f or the paper. In-depth discussion & elaboration f ound in most
sections of the paper.
OUTSTANDING( 100 T he topic is f ocused narrowly enough f or the scope of this assignment. Research
MARKS)
statement provides direction f or the paper. In-depth discussion & elaboration f ound
(100)
in all sections of the paper.
COHERENCE / R (10%)
100 / 100
Coherence / Report Organisation / Conclusion
SUB STANDARD / NO Very bad organisation. No separation of sections, logical organisation is f ound.
ATTEMP
Unacceptable report.
(0)
POOR
No logical f low is f ound. Disjoint inf ormation without any logical sequence is f ound.
(20)
SATISFACTORY (40 Author sometimes ties together inf ormation f rom the sources. Paper does not f low MARKS)
disjointedness is apparent.
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Inf ormation ties together f or f ew sources. Paper f lows with only f ew joints.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Logical sequencing is ensured but more coherence and logical linking is required.
Author's writing demonstrates the relationship among material obtained f rom some
sources.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Paper f lows f rom one issue to the next in logical order. Clear demarcation of each
discussion f ound. Author's writing demonstrates the relationship among material
obtained f rom most sources.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Paper f lows f rom one issue to the next seamlessly and in logical order. Author's
MARKS)
writing demonstrates the relationship among material obtained f rom all sources.
(100)
REP. ST RUCT UR (5%)
100 / 100
Report Structure, spelling, Grammar ( 5 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Report is badly organized ; multiple f ont types are used ; no justif ication ; very bad in
ATTEMP
presence
(0)
POOR
(20)
Poor Structure ; lot of f ormatting errors and spelling mistakes are f ound
SATISFACTORY (40 May have random organization, lacking internal paragraph structure and use f ew or
MARKS)
inappropriate transitions. Paragraphs may lack topic sentences or main ideas, or may
(40)
be too general or too specif ic to be ef f ective. Paragraphs may not all relate to
paper's subject.
GOOD
(50)
May list ideas or arrange them randomly rather than using logical structure. May use
transitions, but they are not in a logical sequence. While each paragraph may relate to
central idea, logic is not always clear. Paragraphs have topic sentences but may be
overly general, and arrangement of sentences within paragraphs may lack structure.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses f airly sophisticated transitional
devices; e.g., may move f rom least to more important idea. Some logical links may be
f aulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to paper's central idea.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Uses a logical structure appropriate to paper's subject and purpose. Sophisticated
transitional sentences of ten develop one idea f rom the previous one or identif y their
logical relations. It guides the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression
of ideas.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Prof essional touch is f ound in the report structure; Student's ef f ort in f ormatting and
MARKS)
presenting the report is clearly visible. Each section is caref ully f ormatted and no
(100)
visible errors f ound.
REFERENCES (10%)
70 / 100
Citation & Ref erences ( 10 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO No ref erences are f ound
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
General sites such as google , Wikipedia are given
SATISFACTORY (40 Identif y a f ew of the most signif icant articles.
MARKS)
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Identif y some of the most signif icant articles.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Identif y most of the most signif icant articles.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Identif ied all of the most signif icant articles.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Perf ect Harvard Style is used f or all citations
MARKS)
(100)
Purchase answer to see full
attachment